If @sallycinnamin confirms his spot, I wouldn't mind assisting you.You can assist me if you like?
berbasloth4 is not playingAll spots are taken?
If there's a waitlist, add me into that in case someone decides to quit at any point.
Unfortunately, there is no way to avoid itI don't like the 1v1 arguments.. What qualities they bring to the team, how they'd work with the players around them and how they would fit into the tactics is more important for me.
Could do with help from someone...got ideas for the first few rounds but beyond that will be struggling....If @sallycinnamin confirms his spot, I wouldn't mind assisting you.
berbasloth4 is not playing
ahahaha i m such a comedian
It'll be the same for me, though. I'll be doing lots of research for the later rounds just to find some good picks.Could do with help from someone...got ideas for the first few rounds but beyond that will be struggling....
Fifth is even worse. You live in hope that you can get one of the real great players (Pele, Cruyff, Beckenbauer and Best) but then fall into depression as they are picked off one by one.The feck, 7th position sucks . Lucky for me, the drop in quality from Eusebio is non existent.
What do you guys mean by selling out with picking Pele? I'm assuming the taboo is about picking the two GOAT beings as Maradona was scrutinised in the other draft?
Is it supposedly because they sway votes so much, or something else?
Could you explain this? Sorry if I'm being a bit slow, haven't followed one of these drafts in a while.The pool is extremely shallow so I don't think there should be any restrictions but that one GOAT needs to be banned imo.
Yes. They are easy picks that don't really take much persuasion or tactics to get votes. All you really have to say is "C'mon, its Pele" and people will nod their heads and agree. Still, pretty much every drafter would pick him if given the chance (I know I would).What do you guys mean by selling out with picking Pele? I'm assuming the taboo is about picking the two GOAT beings as Maradona was scrutinised in the other draft?
Is it supposedly because they sway votes so much, or something else?
Just tongue in cheek mate .
Yes. They are easy picks that don't really take much persuasion or tactics to get votes. All you really have to say is "C'mon, its Pele" and people will nod their heads and agree. Still, pretty much every drafter would pick him if given the chance (I know I would).
Eusebio was the obvious 5th pick in my opinion. He's fecking brilliant and his versatility makes him a better pick than Müller in my opinion (not a better player as a striker though ).Fifth is even worse. You live in hope that you can get one of the real great players (Pele, Cruyff, Beckenbauer and Best) but then fall into depression as they are picked off one by one.
Really? I kind of wanted a player to build a side around (Wanted Beckenbauer truth be told) and I felt that neither of those guys could give me that (I also have a tactic that I want to implement that they were not crucial to). I'm surprised that you would rate Eusabio over Muller, what with the latter being German and all.Eusebio was the obvious 5th pick in my opinion. He's fecking brilliant and his versatility makes him a better pick than Müller in my opinion (not a better player as a striker though .
Could you explain this? Sorry if I'm being a bit slow, haven't followed one of these drafts in a while.
NoIs anybody surprised that Cruyff was eligible for this draft? I always thought he was a bit younger then the guys in the 40's.
Okay, fair enough.
Eusebio has that 'one man attack who can destroy every team on his own' thing going for him. In the grand scheme of things that has to count for something. As a pure number 9, I rate Müller slightly higher as Eusebio. As an overall player, Eusebio has the edge. Eusebio also gives you a lot more options to build a team, you can play him as a lone forward, 2nd striker, part of a two upfront or even as an inside forward, which makes him the better pick in my opinion. I wouldn't mind playing them together in one of the next rounds .Really? I kind of wanted a player to build a side around (Wanted Beckenbauer truth be told) and I felt that neither of those guys could give me that (I also have a tactic that I want to implement that they were not crucial to). I'm surprised that you would rate Eusabio over Muller, what with the latter being German and all.
Eusebio and Muller in a two man attackEusebio has that 'one man attack who can destroy every team on his own' thing going for him. In the grand scheme of things that has to count for something. As a pure number 9, I rate Müller slightly higher as Eusebio. As an overall player, Eusebio has the edge. Eusebio also gives you a lot more options to build a team, you can play him as a lone forward, 2nd striker, part of a two upfront or even as an inside forward, which makes him the better pick in my opinion. I wouldn't mind playing them together in one of the next rounds .
Sorry, not the Pele bit - the bit about the pool of players not being deep. Did you mean from a popularity/vote winning POV?There was a debate on whether Pele should be banned or not - unnamed players can't be named so we just made references to him instead of just using his name, and yeah in the end it was decided that no one should be banned, so that there is a fair representation of the decade overall.
Sorry, not the Pele bit - the bit about the pool of players not being deep. Did you mean from a popularity/vote winning POV?
He's already picked . Unless you talk about reinforcements already, and that's still far far away. I'll worry about that if I make it through the first round and Invictus doesn't.I'm not going to lie, even though you are up against me,I would love to see that attack. Fortunately (Or rather unfortunately for you) with your position in the picking order, I can't see Eusebio lasting until you.
OK, thanks.Oh, more to do with popularity. There will be a lot of unknown gems making their debut in this draft and the number of 'known' or renowned players will probably be over by round 4-5ish I think.
Yeah, I was talking about reinforcements as I assumed you were too. Like you said, he is already gone. Is it me, or do the 40's have the greatest pool of players out of every era?He's already picked . Unless you talk about reinforcements already, and that's still far far away. I'll worry about that if I make it through the first round and Invictus doesn't.
The highest concentration of GOATs? Probably yes. The deepest pool? Probably not.Yeah, I was talking about reinforcements as I assumed you were too. Like you said, he is already gone. Is it me, or do the 40's have the greatest pool of players out of every era?
In terms of making a best XI, the 40's would come out tops against any other decade. However, the lack of coverage and due to how long ago it was, there are a lot of players that won't be recognised today (Even some of the best players of the times).The highest concentration of GOATs? Probably yes. The deepest pool? Probably not.
Could do with help from someone...got ideas for the first few rounds but beyond that will be struggling....