40s Retro Football Fantasy Draft | Finished

will skip this one, probably would be okay for the first few rounds but after that i would be a mess and i cant win a game even when i know everyone :lol:

if someone needs a crap AM feel free to contact me.
 
will skip this one, probably would be okay for the first few rounds but after that i would be a mess and i cant win a game even when i know everyone :lol:

if someone needs a crap AM feel free to contact me.

I'm trying to write a player list now and its slowing down alarmingly already. If you did play you wouldn't be the only one struggling!
 
This partnership needs to be dissolved for greater good of the draft community :mad: jus kiddin

article-0-00561E10000004B0-198_468x286.jpg
 
I'm trying to write a player list now and its slowing down alarmingly already. If you did play you wouldn't be the only one struggling!
I'm really struggling. Just resorting to writing down every world cup finalist first team player from the 60/70's.
 
1. What is the definition of peak, as it pertains to this draft? And what kind of duration does it entail? An international tournament when the player caught fire in an otherwise vanilla career? A season? And taking from that :

Suppose player X embarrassed player Y in a tournament at his peak, but apart from that instance, player Y consistently had player X's number, be it in domestic or competitions competitions. Does the argument that player X overwhelmed player Y in a head-to-head at their peak, hence there in as inherent advantage 1v1 seem reasonable?
This is a vintage rules draft, so the peak is a 3 year one.

As for the rest, that argument has been used a lot of times and it depends on the players in question. I personally don't go by one-offs but rather the strengths and weaknesses of the two players and whether on paper they give one of them an advantage or not. It is upto you in the end.
 
I don't like the 1v1 arguments.. What qualities they bring to the team, how they'd work with the players around them and how they would fit into the tactics is more important for me.
 
I don't like the 1v1 arguments.. What qualities they bring to the team, how they'd work with the players around them and how they would fit into the tactics is more important for me.
Me neither. Football isn't a game of 1 vs 1. If it was, the game would be very boring and predictable.
 
From the chain draft final thread:

Tell you something come one hell of a long way since the classic "newbie sheep drafts", Iain Dowie says hello! Seriously though super teams and if there is room on the next draft count me in.
 
I am in -

Managers List

1. harms
2. Skizzo/Pat_Mustard
3. Joga Bonito
4. Balu
5. Invictus
6. Gio
7. Aldo
8. Marty1968
9. Annahnomoss (pending confirmation)
10. ctp
11. NM/EAP
12. Gol123
13. Tuppet
 
Managers List

1. harms
2. Skizzo/Pat_Mustard
3. Joga Bonito
4. Balu
5. Invictus
6. Gio
7. Aldo
8. Marty1968
9. Annahnomoss (pending confirmation)
10. ctp
11. NM/EAP
12. Gol123
13. Tuppet
14. sallycinnamin (pending confirmation)
 

Managers List

1. harms
2. Skizzo/Pat_Mustard
3. Joga Bonito
4. Balu
5. Invictus
6. Gio
7. Aldo
8. Marty1968
9. Annahnomoss (pending confirmation)
10. ctp
11. NM/EAP
12. Gol123
13. Tuppet
14. sallycinnamin (pending confirmation)
15. crappycraperson
 
Busy month ahead so I'll give this one a skip, but I'm looking forward to following the progress when I can!
 
Anybody want to be an AM with me?
 
Managers List

1. harms
2. Skizzo/Pat_Mustard
3. Joga Bonito
4. Balu
5. Invictus
6. Gio
7. Aldo
8. Marty1968
9. Chesterlestreet
10. ctp
11. NM/EAP
12. Gol123
13. Tuppet
14. @sallycinnamin (pending confirmation)
15. crappycraperson
 
Managers List

1. harms
2. Skizzo/Pat_Mustard
3. Joga Bonito
4. Balu
5. Invictus
6. Gio
7. Aldo
8. Marty1968
9. Chesterlestreet
10. ctp
11. NM/EAP
12. Gol123
13. Tuppet
14. sallycinnamin (pending confirmation)
15. crappycraperson

I put @Chesterlestreet in Annah's spot. One more open until @sallycinnamin confirms or declines.
 
Managers List

1. harms
2. Skizzo/Pat_Mustard
3. Joga Bonito
4. Balu
5. Invictus
6. Gio
7. Aldo
8. Marty1968
9. Chesterlestreet
10. ctp
11. NM/EAP
12. Gol123
13. Tuppet
14. sallycinnamin (pending confirmation)
15. crappycraperson
16. RedTiger
 
The pool is extremely shallow so I don't think there should be any restrictions but that one GOAT needs to be banned imo.

Yeah, the problem is that luck 'o the draw could be extremely important to begin with if the are no blocked GOATS.
 
Yeah, the problem is that luck 'o the draw could be extremely important to begin with if the are no blocked GOATS.

Fair point but it's the usual case as in most drafts. I count 12 GOATs for the upper and mid echelons of managers, and then several fantastic players, with whom you can pull of a great double combo for the lower echelon. Just about balances it out imo.
 
Fair point but it's the usual case as in most drafts. I count 12 GOATs for the upper and mid echelons of managers, and then several fantastic players, with whom you can pull of a great double combo for the lower echelon. Just about balances it out imo.
Really? Ffs. I might actually have to do some research ahead of the first pick.