calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
No doubt.I assume he's doing a Babylon Bee impression.
No doubt.I assume he's doing a Babylon Bee impression.
So you don't have a reputable source?CNN have a 2 minute delay. So they can edit the bits where Biden chatters incoherently about nothing.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Embarrassing.So you don't have a reputable source?
This is from the horse's mouth...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Its amusing to see all the hype. Its like over 4 months away from the vote so this debate won't make one difference to the outcome.Debates are a waste of time and have zero impact on who people decide to vote for. Hillary crushed Trump in her debates with him and still lost.
Only people who were pre-disposed to vote against Trump thought Hilary "crushed" him. Anyone predisposed toward Trump thought he won and among people who didn't watch the debates just the sound bites thought it was either even or Trump had the better sound bites. It was a bit like the first televised debate between Nixon and Kennedy where TV viewers and radio listeners had a different impression of who won.Debates are a waste of time and have zero impact on who people decide to vote for. Hillary crushed Trump in her debates with him and still lost.
17% sounds pretty accurate. There are a lot more undecideds than you might think having access only to the internet and international news from Europe and not listening to random people at bars, restaurants, social gatherings, etc. A lot of people will watch the debate at friend's houses, at bars, simply because its the only live thing on at 6-9pm not out of intense interest in reading politics every day. There are a fair number of people who dislike both Biden and Trump where even if they are predisposed one way, they are thinking about not voting at all so the debate could determine if they vote at all.Because i know it was 17%. Joking
Nah, i dont think 17% are enough interested to see a political debate and at the same time not know enough of who is trump and biden to not have a decision made.
It sounds to me that they are hiding the embarrasment of their already made up decision behind a political monocle and cigar appearance
Anyone who actually tries to engage in an actual debate during these things will always end up coming off worse, because they aren't debates. It's WWE politics.Only people who were pre-disposed to vote against Trump thought Hilary "crushed" him. Anyone predisposed toward Trump thought he won and among people who didn't watch the debates just the sound bites thought it was either even or Trump had the better sound bites. It was a bit like the first televised debate between Nixon and Kennedy where TV viewers and radio listeners had a different impression of who won.
True but I'm not sure he can last 90 mins without crazy thoughTrump seems much sharper. All he has to do is not be crazy and he's got this
True.Dems really fecked up not running another candidate. At the same time this debate will do next to nothing to change the majority of people's minds.
Yeah, he blundered that and has sounded low volume at times. Trump did goof up third world nation the first time, sounded like third whirl nurtion.Biden's facts are better but Trump does sound more coherent while Biden just looks much older and less with it the way he is standing there. Says trillionaires instead of billionaires. Oh jeez Biden is floundering bad now
I'm not sure Biden can last 9 more mins without completely misspeaking.True but I'm not sure he can last 90 mins without crazy though
Sadly he seems very well coached tonight, keeping it simple, not getting personal or cute.True but I'm not sure he can last 90 mins without crazy though
9 mins us generous TBH!I'm not sure Biden can last 9 more mins without completely misspeaking.
That you, Joe?9 mins us generous TBH!
Naw, I'm just crap at typingThat you, Joe?