VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,985
Yes, I don’t think this will move the needle with less than 3 weeks to go and with many already having early voted. This is the level of scrutiny she should’ve received from the beginning.
Yikes!If I’m not mistaken, Harris’ interview was cut short by her people - probably because it went so poorly.
If I’m not mistaken, Harris’ interview was cut short by her people - probably because it went so poorly.
Don't think that was too bad. Wasn't great certainly wasn't awful. Would've been nice if the host didn't interrupt every sentence.
Partial cult, partial racists, partial uninformed morons. Some overlap of course. Also add in how US politics is almost like a sports game to them. Very tribal, my President can do no wrong etc etc.It’s really infuriating that! I mean he could commit literal murder and not lose a vote. That’s not fandom. That’s a cult!
I’m sorry, but Brett interrupted her more than once in this two minutes clip. She couldn’t finish a thought without interruption.She knew what to expect though. The fact that she and her team had a considerable amount of time to be prepared and still came up short on certain questions is not a good look.
Well, the actual headline should be "Harris getting annoyed because she is not even allowed to respond".
But whatever.
He’s right, though. She was interrupted more than once.Ignore the headline.
Yeah that’s just bad interviewing. It didn’t seem like she was getting anywhere helpful or good with her first answer, but his first interruption “I’ll get to the question I promise you” makes no sense since he’d already asked her a question.Well, the actual headline should be "Harris getting annoyed because she is not even allowed to respond".
But whatever.
This clip shows a lot that is wrong with our politics and media these days. Baier is not unhinged like Carlson or Hannity, but he’s from Fox.Yeah that’s just bad interviewing. It didn’t seem like she was getting anywhere helpful or good with her first answer, but his first interruption “I’ll get to the question I promise you” makes no sense since he’d already asked her a question.
The second interruption is pointless. It’s not like he’s pointing out her refusal to answer a question or calling out a lie. He starts naming a bill that she brings up and then continues to talk over her, she asks can she finish the answer (which actually had some substance to it unlike the first bit) and he says “yes ma’am” and keeps talking over her.
“Ignore the headline” maybe don’t ignore the video
I do not believe so.Is this a parody?
Amidst even the most challenging of elections, hope persists.Very refreshing to hear; we need more of this!
Sometimes in the hullabaloo of the election cycle people say silly things and get lost in the syrup of trying to win at all cost. No one is the evil one, no one wants to kill democracy. This is about navigateable political disagreements, but we can all get through this together. The least we can do is acknowledge that both candidates and their respective parties have the best interest of the country and the people at their core and after the election I hope we can all put aside our differences, shake hands and move forward in full support of the winning candidate for the betterment and prosperity of all the people everywhere.
I would like to have what he has been having.Very refreshing to hear; we need more of this!
Sometimes in the hullabaloo of the election cycle people say silly things and get lost in the syrup of trying to win at all cost. No one is the evil one, no one wants to kill democracy. This is about navigable political disagreements, but we can all get through this together. The least we can do is acknowledge that both candidates and their respective parties have the best interest of the country and the people at their core and after the election I hope we can all put aside our differences, shake hands and move forward in full support of the winning candidate for the betterment and prosperity of all the people everywhere.
Is irrelevant, like it ir not there is a distinct possibility he might be the next President, this guy is just hedging his bets so he doesn't get on the wrong side of the winnerThe normalization of Trump.
Trump wants to be a dictator and punish people who disagree with him.Is irrelevant, like it ir not there is a distinct possibility he might be the next President, this guy is just hedging his bets so he doesn't get on the wrong side of the winner
If I’m not mistaken, Harris’ interview was cut short by her people - probably because it went so poorly.
I somehow doubt Harris staffers are 'they' in this context.
I’m sorry, but Brett interrupted her more than once in this two minutes clip. She couldn’t finish a thought without interruption.
He later said she arrived 17 minutes late to the interview, it was initially agreed at 5pm reserving enough time to turn around the tape for his 6 pm show. So whats more likely, his own folks pushing him that they needed to end right then to turn around the tape with 15 minutes left, or Harris staffers thinking she couldnt last another 2 minutes?I believe Baier himself said he had 4 Harris staffers waiving at him to end it, which watching it live is what appeared to have happened.
Otherwise there was no reason for Fox to abruptly end it in minute 28 if they had 30 minutes reserved.
He later said she arrived 17 minutes late to the interview, it was initially agreed at 5pm reserving enough time to turn around the tape for his 6 pm show. So whats more likely, his own folks pushing him that they needed to end right then to turn around the tape with 15 minutes left, or Harris staffers thinking she couldnt last another 2 minutes?
As said, if their lips are moving, they are lying.
That's strange logic. Surely less time is best with a hostile interviewer?Part of the problem is it looked like Harris’ team only negotiated 30 minutes for the interview, which incentivized Baier to ambush her from the very start all the way through the abrupt end. Had they negotiated an hour, both sides would’ve had plenty of time to talk at length.
That's strange logic. Surely less time is best with a hostile interviewer?
I mean of course you would think that given your priors on her, but this came straight from his mouthThey weren’t obliged to air the interview at 6 EST. They could’ve aired it later. Having negotiated interview parameters before, my guess is the Harris people, knowing how badly it was going, wanted to cut it short to spare her any further damage on social media. As it stands, Trump has already rebroadcast the entire thing on his page as an ad and she is getting lampooned by right wing Twitter. She simply wasn’t ready for a hostile interview, and it showed.