2024 U.S. Elections | Trump wins

Great line by Joy Reid...

Vance want to make 10 year olds give birth.

Walz wants to make sure 10 year olds get lunch.

That'd be a great ad & a great t shirt.
That’s brilliant.

The contrast between Vance and Walt couldn’t be any bigger. This is not like Kane and Pence or Harris and Pence.

Swing voters should easily see the difference.
 
Walz is a very good speaker. Didn't expect him to go after DJ and JD so strongly. He seems to relish the role of attack dog and has the personality for it. Harris was decent and has improved since 2020.
 
Thank heavens Biden and Trump decided so early, not in september/october.
 
A risky thing to tweet given that November is still months off.

If you still think Harris is a worse option than Biden (which was a widespread argument on twitter and was sometimes seen here too), I really don't know what to say :lol:
 
If you still think Harris is a worse option than Biden (which was a widespread argument on twitter and was sometimes seen here too), I really don't know what to say :lol:

Its more so to say any number of things can happen between now and November, so perhaps its not wise for Friedman to be measuring the drapes in the oval office yet.
 


Trump barely leading with the economy is a disaster for him, that, and the border, are their two main selling points.
 
Flailing about yet again...


Was that tweet of Walz's family supposed to be negative? If so, what's the idea there? I know they don't formal and the kids are dressed like random teenagers on a day off - but I don't see how that's supposed to be a negative.

I mean, I know it's a ridiculous tweet anyway (if it was supposed to be negative), but I just don't understand what the tweeter may have been thinking.
 
Was that tweet of Walz's family supposed to be negative? If so, what's the idea there? I know they don't formal and the kids are dressed like random teenagers on a day off - but I don't see how that's supposed to be a negative.

I mean, I know it's a ridiculous tweet anyway (if it was supposed to be negative), but I just don't understand what the tweeter may have been thinking.
I agree. We see families like these all the time in America (particularly the wife and children). Not sure what the original post tried to accomplish.
 
Was that tweet of Walz's family supposed to be negative? If so, what's the idea there? I know they don't formal and the kids are dressed like random teenagers on a day off - but I don't see how that's supposed to be a negative.

I mean, I know it's a ridiculous tweet anyway (if it was supposed to be negative), but I just don't understand what the tweeter may have been thinking.
It was meant to be negative? I took it entirely at face value. Surely that is a very normal average family?

As opposed to,

main-qimg-b9c110ef24860a8eabf9f6b510f53e1f-lq

main-qimg-d6ed669cb023786b4e05d77073ef740f-lq
 
I think that Walz is a poor pick, he'll be labelled as socialist/commie and is not very photogenic. His talking is also not sophisticated, albeit some might find it very relatable. Thought that Shapiro was a better choice.

If Harris loses, I think Shapiro, Whitmer, Buttigieg and Newson will be the main candidates (my preference is in Whitmer).

his talking is not sophisticated
 
Didums...


He liked to smell his sisters panties, doesn't get his wife wet, a faux intellectual, hates Barbie and is an absolute cnut. I like to say this to anyone who mentions his name. I'd fecking love to say it to his face too, imagine the satisfaction.
 
Lurking r/conservative atm and surprisingly they are pretty split on the Walz pick, you might even say a slight majority think it’s bad for them and don’t wish for a VP debate.

Of course it’s not representative of the MAGA base (some loon on Twitter/X think New York is in play now because the Shapiro snub alienated the state’s Jewish voters), but pretty encouraging if Walz can make some tiny inroads with the Republicans who haven’t gone completely rabid.