If he couldn't guarantee PA then Shapiro would have been the wrong choice. Far too many minor scandals that the right wing media could have clung onto (ardently pro-Israel, office sex scandal, that murder investigation as DA), not to mention his race. They're calling it anti-semetic that he wasn't chosen, but they would have went off in the grossest way if he was.
I think that Walz is a poor pick, he'll be labelled as socialist/commie and is not very photogenic. His talking is also not sophisticated, albeit some might find it very relatable. Thought that Shapiro was a better choice.
If Harris loses, I think Shapiro, Whitmer, Buttigieg and Newson will be the main candidates (my preference is in Whitmer).
I think that Walz is a poor pick, he'll be labelled as socialist/commie and is not very photogenic. His talking is also not sophisticated, albeit some might find it very relatable. Thought that Shapiro was a better choice.
If Harris loses, I think Shapiro, Whitmer, Buttigieg and Newson will be the main candidates (my preference is in Whitmer).
Any changes in the polling numbers since the VP pick or is it too early?
I just cannot see a mixed race (none of them white) woman winning the US presidential election. Won't believe it unless the actual results show otherwise. It's an uphill battle.
I'm a single issue voter and this is my issue
Its more so to say any number of things can happen between now and November, so perhaps its not wise for Friedman to be measuring the drapes in the oval office yet.
I don't see it. Hilary came close because she was running against Trump. Any other generic republican would have won more comfortably, imo. Same here with Harris, she might get close because she is running against Trump. However, she would lose by healthy margin against any other republican.Too early. Give it a few days.
On the second bit, its completely possible although it needs to be the right candidate imo.
How do you figure that?I don't see it. Hilary came close because she was running against Trump. Any other generic republican would have won more comfortably, imo. Same here with Harris, she might get close because she is running against Trump. However, she would lose by healthy margin against any other republican.
I don't see it. Hilary came close because she was running against Trump. Any other generic republican would have won more comfortably, imo. Same here with Harris, she might get close because she is running against Trump. However, she would lose by healthy margin against any other republican.
A lot more independents, and even a minority of Dems, won't be averse to voting for a republican candidate if it wasn't Trump.How do you figure that?
'Any other Republican' haven't been able to topple Trump and he's now running a third time after losing the last general election. Are we really sure Haley or DeSantis would keep the Trump bloc and then add to it? Seems a stretch to me.
Or do you think fewer Dems would turn out to vote against a non-Trump candidate?
Yeah, true. Kamala happened to be at the right place at the right time. I don't think she had a chance if she got primaried.I don't disagree that Harris would lose to someone like Nikki Haley, but in terms of winning against Trump, I think she has a 50/50 chance because the Dems seem pretty galvanized against preventing another four years of Trump. If Biden announced last year he wasn't running, its doubtful Harris would've won the nomination against the likes of Newsom, Shapiro, or Whitmer imo. Fortunately for her, Biden selected her as VP, which made her the defacto default replacement for him if he couldn't continue.
In a vacuum, sure, that could be true. But in the real world, I think Trump generates more enthusiastic support (and opposition) than his Republican adversaries. He got 74mil votes in 2020. Haley or DeSantis aren't topping that, certainly not by inspiring a massive shift in what is usually a relatively small number of true swing votesA lot more independents, and even a minority of Dems, won't be averse to voting for a republican candidate if it wasn't Trump.
He was just posting it to see if his followers could come up with something negative because he couldn'tI agree. We see families like these all the time in America (particularly the wife and children). Not sure what the original post tried to accomplish.
Absolutely nothing to suggest Haley couldn’t have outperformed Trump in a general election, in fact quite the contrary.In a vacuum, sure, that could be true. But in the real world, I think Trump generates more enthusiastic support (and opposition) than his Republican adversaries. He got 74mil votes in 2020. Haley or DeSantis aren't topping that, certainly not by inspiring a massive shift in what is usually a relatively small number of true swing votes
It wasn’t though? It’s on his X.And your first thought was correct
What Vacuum?In a vacuum, sure, that could be true. But in the real world, I think Trump generates more enthusiastic support (and opposition) than his Republican adversaries. He got 74mil votes in 2020. Haley or DeSantis aren't topping that, certainly not by inspiring a massive shift in what is usually a relatively small number of true swing votes
They're not beating the weird accusations anytime soon.
It's hard to say much about turnout in 2020 because of covid-era laws that made voting easier. In both 2016 and 2020 he failed to reach Romney 2012's percentage of the vote (47.2).In a vacuum, sure, that could be true. But in the real world, I think Trump generates more enthusiastic support (and opposition) than his Republican adversaries. He got 74mil votes in 2020. Haley or DeSantis aren't topping that, certainly not by inspiring a massive shift in what is usually a relatively small number of true swing votes
Too bad Magnolia Grill in Durham closed a few years back. You would have dug it, it had Stitt vibes.True.... but cal knows good food so I trust him. He's the only person in this place, and probably in NC/GA who knows who Stitt and Hastings are.
Is this creepy fecker still doing the rounds? I've noticed he's at least stopped trying to fill in his hairline with permanent marker.
I mean Mogadishu has some pretty nice beaches tbf.How do you turn 12 huge states with 69 million inhabitants into a coastal city? That's a weird thing to say.
I mean Mogadishu has some pretty nice beaches tbf.
What is unquestionably true is that Trump initiated, or accelerated a flip of low educated, blue collar, rural white voters across the country, and especially in Midwestern swing states, that Democrats were once competitive with. Counties that Bill Clinton used to win, or Gore/Kerry/Obama would lose by 10-12 points, are being won by 30/40 points by the Republicans. Trump isn’t a popular candidate, but the fact that during the last 8-9 years he’s put Florida and Ohio out of reach and made WI/MI/PA super competitive at presidential level is beyond what the milquetoast traditional Republicans managed.It's hard to say much about turnout in 2020 because of covid-era laws that made voting easier. In both 2016 and 2020 he failed to reach Romney 2012's percentage of the vote (47.2).
He has some strenghts, especially if you consider how much he sucks.
Great line...
Iowa also shifted to the right quite a bit.the fact that during the last 8-9 years he’s put Florida and Ohio out of reach and made WI/MI/PA super competitive at presidential level is beyond what the milquetoast traditional Republicans managed.
Your first instinct was that it was made up, and then it was Trump - the bloke who wouldn't know the truth if it was stapleed to his forehead!It wasn’t though? It’s on his X.