Known for considerable R bias in his polling.Good numbers, but isn't this guy sort of a joke pollster anyway?
Known for substantial R bias in his polling.
Big change in perspective I guess, comparing his cognitive abilities and speech patterns to Biden to now comparing them to Harris.
But Rasmussen is literally unranked at 538, is this guy the one who created their model?
RCP selectively includes which garbage pollsters they want, to push their narrative, 538 don't, and nor should they.
I doubt it's the same model, he hasn't worked there for a decade.
Good numbers, but isn't this guy sort of a joke pollster anyway?
Picking Josh Shapiro could be a bit of a momentum killer.
It won’t sit well with voters in Michigan, Virginia (where there is a sizable Arab electorate), with young voters and with many voters who don’t like what Israel has done since October.It was a long time ago, but man, having that on his record is not going to sit well in Michigan, nor with young voters in general.
It would create a bit of manufactured controversy among a tiny sliver of progressives, but wouldn’t change anything in terms of her momentum since it would be more conspicuous to independents if she didn’t select him, as opposed to appeasing to the far left if she did.
I don’t agree. I hear from Democrats, not Arab and not even minorities. They won’t be happy with Shapiro.It would create a bit of manufactured controversy among a tiny sliver of progressives, but wouldn’t change anything in terms of her momentum since it would be more conspicuous to independents if she didn’t select him, as opposed to appeasing to the far left if she did.
First, I'm really not that invested in the subject, already said I don't know it in detail, and will add now that I happily cede to people with more information. Second, that's stuff from 30 or so years ago, he doesn't have to think that anymore. But either way, I agree that those are some terrible opinions that are not mainstream and should not receive the VP's podium.
I don't think that sliver is so tiny, and I don't think independents would find it conspicuous if he didn't select him. But we shall see.It would create a bit of manufactured controversy among a tiny sliver of progressives, but wouldn’t change anything in terms of her momentum since it would be more conspicuous to independents if she didn’t select him, as opposed to appeasing to the far left if she did.
You don't think it has potential to backfire in Michigan? PA is not the only state where margins will be close come November.
I saw the reaction to the visit of Netanyahu last week to DC. I passed there and the city was locked. The issue of Israel is causing discomfort among many Dem voters of all backgrounds. Putting Shapiro on the ballot won’t be a good idea.I don't think that sliver is so tiny, and I don't think independents would find it conspicuous if he didn't select him. But we shall see.
Also, don't underestimate progressives ability to cut off their nose to spite their face.
It has that potential, but at least online, (non-Muslim) progressive and young voters, including those with very strident messages about Palestine in their bio, have joined Kamala whole-heartedly the moment she announced. Reminders of her track record from the left are being shouted down by other leftists. Some Muslim progressives have praised her "shift in tone" too. She could get away with picking him, and he has very high upside.
That's an unfair framing. They've been extremely clear from the off that he'd be a deeply unpopular choice for them and said that multiple other front running candidates would be perfectly acceptable picks. The Harris campaign will have been fully aware of this, so it's hard to argue that such a pick would be anything other than a slap in the face.I don't think that sliver is so tiny, and I don't think independents would find it conspicuous if he didn't select him. But we shall see.
Also, don't underestimate progressives ability to cut off their nose to spite their face.
Ultimately, it's just not going to matter to Dems. There are far more domestic issues to dwell upon & vote accordingly.I saw the reaction to the visit of Netanyahu last week to DC. I passed there and the city was locked. The issue of Israel is causing discomfort among many Dem voters of all backgrounds. Putting Shapiro on the ballot won’t be a good idea.
I don't think that sliver is so tiny, and I don't think independents would find it conspicuous if he didn't select him. But we shall see.
Also, don't underestimate progressives ability to cut off their nose to spite their face.
You don't think it has potential to backfire in Michigan? PA is not the only state where margins will be close come November.
Always bear in mind that 70% of Jews vote Democratic, and the optics of excluding a VP who happens to be Jewish, because of a couple of recent comments, won't be taken very well by them. Harris' job at this point is to get as many independents as possible, which won't be helped if she is perceived as deliberately not selecting Shapiro to assuage a very small, but vocal faction of people who wouldn't ordinarily vote for Harris anyway.
The presidential election is not a popularity context, driving up turnout in New York literally doesn't matter outside of downballot races.
No it doesn't?!Ultimately, its all about winning, and Trump's paths to 270 become next to impossible if he loses PA. So the value of selecting an incredibly popular Governor of PA (61% popularity in a state Trump previously won in 2016), will outweigh the twitter outrage of the moment.
Jews live all over the country. There was an mass shooting attack in Pittsburgh just a few years ago, so PA voters are all too familiar with anti-semitism. There are also about 425k jews who live in PA.
No it doesn't?!
And electoral votes have changed since then, and your argument was based on boosting the PA vote.Losing PA is a likely harbinger of losing the rust belt, which would've resulted in a Biden win in 2020, even if he didn't win in GA, AZ, or NV.
And electoral votes have changed since then, and your argument was based on boosting the PA vote.
It’s bigger than what I thought too.Fair enough, jewish population in PA is larger than i expected.
And Muslims are not the only group who will decide this election. Jewish voters, as a group, vote quite overwhelmingly Democrat, but we have seen many Jews, including Rabis criticizing Biden for not helping Israel. I think in polls, percentage wise, the Jewish voters were not as pro Democrat as usual, so it is possible that having the first Jewish VP in the ticket might more than make up the Muslim voters who will not vote for that reason.You don't think it has potential to backfire in Michigan? PA is not the only state where margins will be close come November.