- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 11,690
- Supports
- Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
The 60% of the destroyed housing stock was at the end of the ceasefire, before they started their more intensive bombing of places like Khan Younis. God knows what it is now.
It is however why I was asking generally how much more brutal could the war have been within just the 2 months that have happened so far, short of a nuke or a very rapid Rwanda style genocide? The scale of killing and destruction combined is already I think genuinely unprecedented in the last few decades.
What are the most brutal wars in the very recent past? Yemen and Syria? We're already at more people displaced than Yemen, I imagine more housing stock destroyed and a similar number of people killed (scaled by population). For a war that's taken 2 months so far as opposed to 9 years and a humanitarian catastrophe. Syria we're at more displaced and about 40% of the casualties, for a 10 year war with great actors like Assad, Russia, ISIS, AQ, Hezbollah involved. Difficult to compare Ukraine as the numbers vary so massively. Should probably include project anfal as well there.
So again, excuse me if I'm going to disagree. I'm not even saying that the situation wouldn't have been worse under Trump, who knows. We don't even know because he actually generally didn't get involved during his presidency.
But the war is already ridiculously brutal and there genuinely isn't much more to destroy. So I'm not massively open to the idea that Biden has been a big moderating factor when he continues to provide weapons, military protection, money and diplomatic cover and basically all Israeli politicians are saying the Americans can suck it and they'll do what they want both now and after.
Considering that Trump took the unprecedented move to move the US embassy to Jerusalem to both prove how he was more supportive of Israel's right-wing regime than any other US President and also to hard troll the Palestinians and considering his actions in the US with his "Muslim ban" and more, I think it's quite reasonable to believe the situation would have been measurably worse had he been the President. I don't think you can compare to other situations (Yemen, Syria). You can only compare based on what both previously did re: Israel-Palestine and then make a rational guess on how the two Presidents would have differed. Because of the reasons I stated above, I think double the death toll is a pretty reasonable guess of how much more brutal it could have been. That doesn't mean that Biden has been a successful moderating factor in any way. It just means that Trump has zero incentive for that and IMO cares less about the Palestinians than any President the US has had. I think Trump would have been quicker in sending Israel more bombs and material support in the last few months as well. So while of course we don't "know", I find it irrational to believe Trump would not have been materially worse for the situation.