calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
That's weird. It is my post but under your name.It wasn't me who said that but @calodo2003 . I thought I was losing my mind: When I wrote that?!
Happy birthday though man
That's weird. It is my post but under your name.It wasn't me who said that but @calodo2003 . I thought I was losing my mind: When I wrote that?!
Happy birthday though man
It's like Biden's announcement he won't be running has reenergised the Democrats campaign
I don’t know that it hurts the chances of winning PA. Walz is a very down to earth individual. That’ll win some voters. Shapiro still exists. He’s still PA governor. He’s in that state every day campaigning. I don’t see that combination being a detriment.The simple question is, would Shapiro give Harris a better chance of winning PA than Walz. I believe that answer is yes.
Does that mean that she wont win it? No. Its still 50/50. I just think Shapiro would have given her the edge.
That’s brilliant.Great line by Joy Reid...
Vance want to make 10 year olds give birth.
Walz wants to make sure 10 year olds get lunch.
That'd be a great ad & a great t shirt.
Great line...
Obvs. Herr Trump looks the partYou mentioned Walz not "looking presidential", well, neither does Mark Kelly, if we are going with perceptions here.
A risky thing to tweet given that November is still months off.
Who will play Walz on SNL?
Man of the people.“this type of stuff”.
If you still think Harris is a worse option than Biden (which was a widespread argument on twitter and was sometimes seen here too), I really don't know what to say
Flailing about yet again...
Flailing about yet again...
Didums...
I agree. We see families like these all the time in America (particularly the wife and children). Not sure what the original post tried to accomplish.Was that tweet of Walz's family supposed to be negative? If so, what's the idea there? I know they don't formal and the kids are dressed like random teenagers on a day off - but I don't see how that's supposed to be a negative.
I mean, I know it's a ridiculous tweet anyway (if it was supposed to be negative), but I just don't understand what the tweeter may have been thinking.
What is weird about it?What a weird thing to tweet.
Cryptically posting a perfectly normal picture as if there’s some hidden sinister, negative thing associated with it. A common right wing tactic nowadays.What is weird about it?
It was meant to be negative? I took it entirely at face value. Surely that is a very normal average family?Was that tweet of Walz's family supposed to be negative? If so, what's the idea there? I know they don't formal and the kids are dressed like random teenagers on a day off - but I don't see how that's supposed to be a negative.
I mean, I know it's a ridiculous tweet anyway (if it was supposed to be negative), but I just don't understand what the tweeter may have been thinking.
Cryptically posting a perfectly normal picture as if there’s some hidden sinister, negative thing associated with it. A common right wing tactic nowadays.
I think that Walz is a poor pick, he'll be labelled as socialist/commie and is not very photogenic. His talking is also not sophisticated, albeit some might find it very relatable. Thought that Shapiro was a better choice.
If Harris loses, I think Shapiro, Whitmer, Buttigieg and Newson will be the main candidates (my preference is in Whitmer).