There is an article on CNN saying that Democrats would have gotten crushed without the support of young voters. Yeah, the GOP would be screwed if people over the age of 65 stopped voting for them.
The standard of journalism there is like your team would have lost if you took out a goalkeeper stuff.
Can you remember the last time 65+ failed to turn out?There is an article on CNN saying that Democrats would have gotten crushed without the support of young voters. Yeah, the GOP would be screwed if people over the age of 65 stopped voting for them.
The standard of journalism there is like your team would have lost if you took out a goalkeeper stuff.
Did Trump's absence from the major social media platforms aid in the defeat of extreme candidates by preventing the spread of too much toxic stuff in the general public, unlike from 2016 to 2020?
Exactly. It is very relevant and shows that you need to keep addressing the issues important to the base and those that came out. Keep them engaged.I think that's a fair statement by CNN, given that young people have a history of not voting, and old people don't.
Actually, the article seems to suggest that the turnout was not that high compared to the last 20 years of midterms and in fact, it just was average. It is just that more of them voted for democrats this time compared to the past. But my point was that that's how Dem got their votes just like how GOP got theirs from 65+ mostly and was not exactly something new.I think that's a fair statement by CNN, given that young people have a history of not voting, and old people don't.
This is not a horrible idea unless it gives her a position to cause even more damage.
Now for the house!
Did Pima from Arizona drop their load yet?
It was annoyingly hard to find that gif.