2022 US Elections
- Thread starter calodo2003
- Start date
That’s an extremely tall claim. Redistrict/Dave Wasserman has it at 216 and Taniel at 215, and that’s after giving D close races like CO-03, WA-03, CA-49. 220 means they pretty much sweep every Toss Up seats in play.
Opposite of reality means the Dems have it?
I just saw a news channel where Trump was giving a victory speech and the ticker suggested it was imminent / on course.
Not yet, but it's looking increasingly likely that they will.
I can't do the rural life. I lived it a few years in my teens and refuse to do it again. Give me the city life with culture, people from all walks of life, differing views, and so forth.
What news channel might that have been?
Those interaction metrics on TruthSocial are hilarious.
He's like the love child of Trump and Nate Silver
Dems started 50-50 in the senate but with better goal difference (Harris tiebreaker).
Picked up a seat in Pennsylvania. All else being equal that would make 51-49.
the 3 key states are Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia. Each party is looking to win 2 of those 3.
Dems have a Healthy lead in Arizona. That means GOP need to flip both Georgia in the runoff (where Warnock leads) and Nevada, where they lead but the outstanding vote favours Democrats.
In the house the losses have been far less than expected. McCarthy will have a tough time as speaker.
what news channel did you see?
Online troll, and online troll.
I actually had him muted apparently because he was all over Twitter for a while. I may unmute him just for this
All I'd suggest is to follow him if you are on Twitter. He is quite funny. Could be the first avowed troll I have ever been a fan of.
If you watch College Gameday, there's always at least two or three signs held up that refer to him.
Why does he quote it
No one fecking knows.
You have been the MVP of this thread all year by the way. Less of a collective effort than the 2020 vintage, so kudos
I appreciate the kind words!
Some Indian channel. Good to hear it's still on like Donkey Kong
Considering the respective track records of this dude and Nate Silver in this election you are kind of insulting him. He nailed this thing better than any of the celebrity pollsters.
Agreed! Just think what Cal could have done if he had not flamed out (
) so early in the 2020 thread.Nate Silver has come across pretty petulant and short the last 48 hours
So far, but his bombastic style will result in him getting hammered when he’s inevitably wrong about something. Such is the internet.
He’s not even the best Nate covering elections
Checked out the Biden press conference from yesterday. It does sound like he's going to run for re-election so a lot of our speculation might be all for nought, sadly.
Felt like I had to redeem myself, although it was interesting being immersed in Parler during my sabbatical from here in 2020.Agreed! Just think what Cal could have done if he had not flamed out (
To be fair after that midterm performance given the backdrop the DNC are probably looking at him as a safe option when there isn’t really an obvious candidate stepping forward.
But...he's neither stable, nor is he a genius...
It's almost like he just says the complete opposite of the truth, in lieu of making up a more complicated narrative.
He glossed himself a ‘very stable genius’ when he was in the WH.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/06/...e-house-fitness-very-stable-genius/index.html
He’s the best parody account on Twitter. Trolls the hell out of everyone and just sticks to his act the entire time… it’s amazing how many people he gets to bite.
I don't think they get it. The beauty of turning on Trump is that they can believe it was his fault, and not their abhorrent policy positions, that cost them this election cycle.
Boebert leads Frisch. Wasserman saying the positive news of outstanding votes is inaccurate. Let’s hope he’s wrong!
He's not even the best Nate at 538.
Decent post actually