Whitmer seems like a potentially stronger VP choice since we're speculating. She can help solidify the upper midwest.
I think she'd be good as well.
Whitmer seems like a potentially stronger VP choice since we're speculating. She can help solidify the upper midwest.
There’s nothing homophobic about that joke unless you really squint for it. Man with Butt in his surname gets a mocking name based on it, the horrors! Oh wait, he’s gay so anything anatomically related must be a dig at his sexuality.
Whitmer seems like a potentially stronger VP choice since we're speculating. She can help solidify the upper midwest.
This is a good call.
Newsom has said, unequivocally, that he will not run for President 24 and I think he sticks to that.
What one finds palatable, another might deem unacceptable. Given that out of hundreds of posters that frequented that thread, including modmins that basically camped there daily, none found my sense of humour homophobic, there might just be the tiniest chance that you two are the ones making mountains out of molehill.Yea of course, it’s the person who sees the issue who’s at fault.
This is a good call.
Newsom has said, unequivocally, that he will not run for President 24 and I think he sticks to that.
I was wondering who was where in that hypothetical ticket. We’ll see what happens in the primary of course but I’d have Newsom over Pete myselfYou mean Pete as VP yes? No way he should leap over someone with proven experience as a governor with just being a mayor and cabinet secretary. Of course in an open primary, if he wins, he wins (and he has made some good comments so far) but I doubt he could defeat Newsom unless something major changes.
AgreedWhitmer seems like a potentially stronger VP choice since we're speculating. She can help solidify the upper midwest.
I was wondering who was where in that hypothetical ticket. We’ll see what happens in the primary of course but I’d have Newsom over Pete myself
Bobert is currently losing 49.99% to 50.01%
In the immortal words of Alec Baldwin in Glengarry Glen Ross - ‘A loser is a loser.’Bobert is currently losing 49.99% to 50.01%
Not officially.Hasn’t Biden already announced he plans to run in 2024?
Hasn’t Biden already announced he plans to run in 2024?
Hasn’t Biden already announced he plans to run in 2024?
Biden might have his senile moments but he has been a lot better President than most, and American history will look back at his tenure fondly given how the US did relatively.
He inherited a Covid mess from Trump, and China was the supposed model for recovery from Covid, and those tables have completely flipped over the next 2 years where the US economy (especially jobs) has been more robust than every other major economy.
Putin and Russia have been weakened and the US' actions in Ukraine have been a geopolitical masterclass.
Biden has appointed more federal judges than any president since JFK at this point in his tenure, and has course corrected a lot of inaction from the Obama years on what actually matters in terms of social justice.
And this mid-term performance is the best in almost 30 years for an incumbent, if you exclude Bush 2002 for obvious reasons.
Bobert is currently losing 49.99% to 50.01%
Why am I so invested in this? It's not even my country and I'd celebrate a Boebert loss harder than a United win.
It has become such a divided country that people vote for their party, regardless of the candidate. Porter is awesome and her losing her seat would suck.I still can't believe Katie Porter's seat is in jeopardy. She is the best congressperson out there FFS.
I think he could win, especially if paired with Newsom.
The one, and only time, the entire country will agree with BoBo
Do you see there being pressure on Biden to give up after his first term?
Newsom-Whitmer would be my preferred ticket too. However, I feel that if Kamala runs, Newsom won’t run, in which case we will probably get Kamala-Buttigieg. While I like both of them to some degree, I do not see Kamala as a particularly strong candidate especially if GOP runs someone else than Trump (Desantis).Whitmer seems like a potentially stronger VP choice since we're speculating. She can help solidify the upper midwest.
Newsom-Whitmer would be my preferred ticket too. However, I feel that if Kamala runs, Newsom won’t run, in which case we will probably get Kamala-Buttigieg. While I like both of them to some degree, I do not see Kamala as a particularly strong candidate especially if GOP runs someone else than Trump (Desantis).
Harris being VP, from the same state as him would probably mean donors will favor her. Newsom can then wait for another cycle as governor of the most important state in the US.Newsom has no loyalty to Harris. He will do his own thing.
Harris being VP, from the same state as him would probably mean donors will favor her. Newsom can then wait for another cycle as governor of the most important state in the US.
I hope he runs though (as long as Trump’s insane daughter in law does not have something really bad on him).
First time I ever saw a tweet of his was two days ago around 300P, the one that said Dems would win the senate with a gain. No clue who he is, but don’t think he’s been incorrect thus far.Does this guy have any prior forecasting that he's gotten correct? I don't remember him being posted here during the 2020 election