Drifter
American
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 68,483
Stop Denying Joe Biden's Dementia
I've seen clips of Biden mumbling, struggling to form sentences, getting basic things confused.
But these are from Republican sources. Anything can be taken out of context.
So I'm curious to know, from the perspective of actual democrats, is this legit? Is he seriously 'not all there' mentally? Is dementia a ridiculous, inaccurate slander or is this potentially real?
Personally, I'm so disappointed that it isn't going to be Bernie, no matter what the answer to the above question is.
Hacks...he is demented. Sanders won't go to personal attacks but it's an obvious elephant in the living room.It’s a last gasp attempt by various Sanders hacks on social media to derail Biden’s momentum before the next round of states vote tomorrow. They know it’s probably lights out for their candidate tomorrow night if Biden does well. Sanders and Trump hacks are both singing off the same sheet of music on this one.
And he lost the dem primary in 2016 with method. It's clear that the dem voters care about Bernie policy but they care even more about beating Trump, Bernie has to make a Biden isn't electable argument or just like in 2016 he is going to lose.
1) Republican are going to do the lowest form of attacks possible because well........they actually want to win.
2)This is just an argument against primaries, in any form. If Bernie attacks Biden for shit trade policy and in it turn helps republicans, then it's the fault of Biden voting record not the fact Bernie used it against him in a primary.
He has a terrible stutter.I've seen clips of Biden mumbling, struggling to form sentences, getting basic things confused.
But these are from Republican sources. Anything can be taken out of context.
So I'm curious to know, from the perspective of actual democrats, is this legit? Is he seriously 'not all there' mentally? Is dementia a ridiculous, inaccurate slander or is this potentially real?
Personally, I'm so disappointed that it isn't going to be Bernie, no matter what the answer to the above question is.
Bloomberg and Warren in the same team is peak liberal death spiral.
Yep this could be very well true. Bernie was running as a ''democratic'' socialist and calling for a ''political revolution'' in what at best could be described as a liberal party, during a time where most americans(According to the last poll I looked at)have confidence in the economy. He need big youth turnouts and never got it.This is true.
Trump certainly gave no regard for potential Democrat attacks on his running mates when he went for Cruz, Rubio and the gang (although doing so as the favourite is different than doing do as a clear number two).
Either way I'm not sure Bernie ever had a real chance.
Basically is, right ? If Biden become president and push hard enough(It wouldn't take that much work) Bloomerberg would get the job. The current guy is this personWorld bank is not part of the administration though.
David Robert Malpass (born March 8, 1956)[1] is an American economic analyst and former government official serving as President of the World Bank Group since 2019. Malpass previously served as Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs under Donald Trump, Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary under Ronald Reagan, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under George H. W. Bush. He served as Chief Economist at Bear Stearns for the six years preceding its collapse.[2]
During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Malpass served as an economic advisor to Donald Trump, and in 2017, he was nominated and confirmed as Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs at the Treasury Department. Malpass was elected President of the World Bank on April 4, 2019, having been nominated to the position in February 2019 by the Trump Administration.[3][4] He formally took office on April 9, 2019.[4]
World bank is an international organisation that always has US citizen in charge who is nominated by the POTUS. But it's not part of the cabinet .Yep this could be very well true. Bernie was running as a ''democratic'' socialist and calling for a ''political revolution'' in what at best could be described as a liberal party, during a time where most americans(According to the last poll I looked at)have confidence in the economy. He need big youth turnouts and never got it.
Basically is, right ? If Biden become president and push hard enough(It wouldn't take that much work) Bloomerberg would get the job. The current guy is this person
Or am I missing something ?
So basically I was right. Cheers.World bank is an international organisation that always has US citizen in charge who is nominated by the POTUS. But it's not part of the cabinet .
Bloomberg and Warren in the same team is peak liberal death spiral.
I've seen clips of Biden mumbling, struggling to form sentences, getting basic things confused.
But these are from Republican sources. Anything can be taken out of context.
So I'm curious to know, from the perspective of actual democrats, is this legit? Is he seriously 'not all there' mentally? Is dementia a ridiculous, inaccurate slander or is this potentially real?
Personally, I'm so disappointed that it isn't going to be Bernie, no matter what the answer to the above question is.
why ?I'd prefer Dimon.
why ?
Do you still people will think of her as part of the left after this primary ? I've seen some of her biggest supporters feel massively let down by recent events. Whats looking like a non endorsement for Bernie,(Plus the backing tracking on healthcare and Super PAC's) I think it's killed her ''progressive'' career.anything warren does in that place will be used to define the left going forward.
Bernie's cabinet picks would likely be similar. Cabinet picks and department heads are based on having relevant experience and vetted for him. Trump making his choices based on loyalty to him first and foremost is an anomaly.
Do you still people will think of her as part of the left after this primary ? I've seen some of her biggest supporters feel massively let down by recent events. Whats looking like a non endorsement for Bernie,(Plus the backing tracking on healthcare and Super PAC's) I think it's killed her ''progressive'' career.
You're posting an article from six months ago. I posted about things that happened in the last three weeks. Those TV appearances did happen.
By the sound of this it seems like you'll be leaving the US?My daughter came up to me today and told me she had a feeling Warren will endorse Sanders. I told her she has not but I trusted her insight. She then told me not to worry because it will amount to nothing. Then I got the news...
You were making out that people have only started to focus on Biden's health after he started winning. I was pointing out that its just not true.
Below are clips from September last year where these issues were being discussed.
You were making out that people have only started to focus on Biden's health after he started winning. I was pointing out that its just not true.
Below are clips from September last year where these issues were being discussed.
Anyway what really killed any chance Sanders once had is the erosion among rural old white voters in his base. I assumed before ST that he still does well with them but it ended up going to Biden instead. There’s something like a 20 points swing in that group from 2016 to 2020 which leads to stuffs like Biden winning Mass, Maine and running strong in VT. How much of that is from Buttchug/Klobuchar consolidation? Hard to know, but disappointing nonetheless with youth turnout still mediocre at best.
These are anti-Clinton, anti establishment, non-CNN/MSNBC watching voters. Older blacks loved the Clintons, older whites hate them. And that’s why it’s so perplexing.Maybe the moderates spending the last 4 years blaming him for Hillary losing in 2016 and painting him as an existential threat to everything decent in the world actually paid off for them.
By the sound of this it seems like you'll be leaving the US?
Warren’s entire political philosophy is encapsulated by this quote, ‘you are either on the inside or outside, you get to feel good about yourself on the outside, but real change comes from the inside’.
She never had the slightest interest in a revolution of any kind, she’s an institutionalist, so actions like cozying up to the moderates when she was in the lead or accepting super PAC help when in troubles are all extensions of that dogma. So it makes no sense for her to endorse Sanders and ceding her insider influence at this point.
Anyway what really killed any chance Sanders once had is the erosion among rural old white voters in his base. I assumed before ST that he still does well with them but it ended up going to Biden instead. There’s something like a 20 points swing in that group from 2016 to 2020 which leads to stuffs like Biden winning Mass, Maine and running strong in VT. How much of that is from Buttchug/Klobuchar consolidation? Hard to know, but disappointing nonetheless with youth turnout still mediocre at best.
It’s a last gasp attempt by various Sanders hacks on social media to derail Biden’s momentum before the next round of states vote tomorrow. They know it’s probably lights out for their candidate tomorrow night if Biden does well. Sanders and Trump hacks are both singing off the same sheet of music on this one.
Bernie's cabinet picks would likely be similar. Cabinet picks and department heads are based on having relevant experience and vetted for him. Trump making his choices based on loyalty to him first and foremost is an anomaly.
You were making out that people have only started to focus on Biden's health after he started winning. I was pointing out that its just not true.
Below are clips from September last year where these issues were being discussed.