Click the tweet for the full thread.
That is glorious and I'll fight anyone who says otherwise.
Needs his hard drive checked
I think we found a photo of @Red Dreams
Needs his hard drive checked
I think we found a photo of @Red Dreams
Is this you mateYes.
EDIT:
Steyer is the only other candidate I could see myself voting for.
They don’t need to, that’s the point. The current urban-rural split works in their favour just fine in the Senate.Yeah, Republicans are so humble in comparison
Steyer is an alright guy. We kill him last.Is this you mate
Guy’s been attacking Bernie each debate. Where have ya been?Brought to you by the guy who said he’d never attack other candidates.
Its not wasted if it is right.
I'm not sure I follow. If it's not wasted, then presumably you consider it to be a success in some form. In what way is it succeeding, or what's the objective?
“You know, I have my own views of the word socialist and I’ll be glad to tell them, share them with you in private,” Matthews said forcefully, right before sharing his views in public in an almost panicked, rat-a-tat-tat tone. “They go back to the early 1950s. I have an attitude about them. I remember the Cold War. I have an attitude towards Castro, and I believe if Castro and the Reds had won the Cold War, there would have been executions in Central Park and I might’ve been one of the ones executed and certain other people would be there cheering. So, I have a problem with people who took the other side.”
Matthews then turned his comments back to Sanders. “I don’t know who Bernie supports over these years. I don’t know what he means by socialism. One week it’s Den-mahk, we’re going to be like Den-mahk,” the MSNBC host said, lapsing into an impression of Sanders’ Brooklyn accent. “Ok, that’s harmless. That’s basically a capitalist country with a lot of good social programs. Den-mahk is harmless.”
“He’s clearly in the Denmark category,” Hayes gently pointed out.
“Is he?!” Matthews shot back.
“Yeah,” Hayes replied.
“How do you know? Did he tell you that?” Matthews pressed.
https://www.mediaite.com/election-2...park-if-castro-and-the-reds-had-won-cold-war/
Fox News level of hysteria because Chris Matthews doesn't like the idea of paying more in taxes. Also tries to hedge his bets,"well Bernie talks about a Denmark model for the USA.....but it sounds like he'd execute me in central park".
Also, the cognitive dissonance is breathtaking. So a "Scandinavian Model" is "fine and harmless, with good social programs", yet because Bernie defines that model with a democratic socialism mindset, he equates that to public executions? Absolutely mental.
I think the DNC wants to defeat trump and sees Bernie as a liability in achieving this... From the time I spent in the states and now being quite detached and looking objectively I think they are right to be concerned.Not getting giddy but with the Biden waning which at first was his hardest task to get by, Sanders i reckon is nailed on despite what the DNC wants, it's gunna feel the bern.
Tracking poll updated. Buttchug dropped 3 pts in a single day after the debate.
Biden can also even finish 5th at this pace. There’s a paradox here. While the winner of SC has gone on to become the nominee the last 6 cycles, no one has ever finished 3rd or lower in NH and become the nominee, so that’s a huge hole in the Southern firewall theory.
If Sanders can somehow persuade Warren to drop out before Super Tuesday and get to 40%, he’ll have the mathematics locked in, since 30% of delegates with a huge chunk of the South already gone by then. He most likely will win even without that if the centrist lane remains divided as it is, but there’s a real opportunity here to get things wrapped up by May or so.
have explained.
What the US does affects the world.
Yang said Trump is only the symptom of the problem.
To nominate a hollow candidate like Biden solves nothing.
Bernie is one voice. But millions of voices are not being heard.
I believe in this election those voices are trying to break through the barrier set up by the establishment.
If they do, we will see real change that will help everyone.
Through this?
That's an explanation for why Bernie Sanders should be nominated, from your perspective. I understand that bit. The question I asked was totally different.
What do you hope to achieve by repeating these messages over and over again? If the intention is to persuade people of the important and validity of his messages, then wouldn't your time be better spent sharing it on a platform full of American voters, who can actually take action as a result of it? If the intention is not to persuade people and drive action, then what is it?
How many of your nearly fifty thousand posts on a football forum had a meaningful purpose?Through this?
That's an explanation for why Bernie Sanders should be nominated, from your perspective. I understand that bit. The question I asked was totally different.
What do you hope to achieve by repeating these messages over and over again? If the intention is to persuade people of the important and validity of his messages, then wouldn't your time be better spent sharing it on a platform full of American voters, who can actually take action as a result of it? If the intention is not to persuade people and drive action, then what is it?
I think the DNC wants to defeat trump and sees Bernie as a liability in achieving this... From the time I spent in the states and now being quite detached and looking objectively I think they are right to be concerned.
I can see Bernie piling on votes in safe democrat seats and if it were an election based on the popular vote then he would have a good chance
Reality isnt that though... It's an electoral college and the election will be decided in a few key battlegrounds and I don't think Bernie will do well there
I'd love to be wrong because I dread to think how bad trump might get if he does not have to face re-election
I think the democratic party's worst scenario is a brokered convention between independent Bernie Sanders and former republican Bloomberg ... And I wouldn't rule that out
If the objective of the DNC is to defeat Trump, they should back the only realistic option they have. Sanders.
I agree with that being the objective... But that's precisely why they dont want Sanders
He will rack up votes in safe seats but I think will have a disaster in swing states and trump will win the electoral college (even if he looses the popular vote again) and with Sanders as leader the democrats might even loose the house as well.
As this article says...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...a-bdbf-1dfb23249293_story.html?outputType=amp
Im not that old but I've read about it and yeah if they are fighting internal battles in the run up to the campaign it's hard to imagine a united and functioning party in the election.Remember 1968?
They handed over the presidency to Nixon.
Sounds remarkably similar to what the Corbyn supporters were saying in the run up to the UK election... I anticipate similar results if Bernie is the nomineeI reject that analysis.
What is the appeal of Sanders?
The answer is policies that everyone can identify with.
Health Care, Climate Change, Living Wage and Free College.
Sanders will definitely campaign in Ohio for example. Some may not agree with all his policies, but people know him to be an honest man.
You don't get that with Biden and Bloomberg.
Fair enough.
I will be more direct about why Biden should never be nominated. Buttigeg is an inside joke of the DNC that is now on them.
Some perspective.
Hillary's emails was a real issue. But for most people it is a little abstract.
But what Biden did to help his son is open corruption. Everyone can understand that. He has gagged the Liberal media. But he wont be able to gag a vindicated Trump.
The Republicans will be energized. Democrats will have to hold their nose hard to vote for him should he become the nominee. Many will simply stay home. That will also hurt Congress. Just think of the damage to the world it will cause.
If the objective of the DNC is to defeat Trump, they should back the only realistic option they have. Sanders.
They can back him fully and when he becomes President compromise with him. He is a reasonable man and will do that.
Win win situation.
How many of your nearly fifty thousand posts on a football forum had a meaningful purpose?
Sounds remarkably similar to what the Corbyn supporters were saying in the run up to the UK election... I anticipate similar results if Bernie is the nominee
For clarity I think trump probably wins against any of the nominees ... It's just he wins by more against Bernie I think
Alright. Sounded to me like you were trying to tell him you had a problem with his posts but if you're just fascinated by his inner workings then crack on.It's a harmless question from one anonymous stranger to another at the end of the day.