Red Dreams
Full Member
How do the Dems expect young people who are marginalized by these rule changes to show up if say Biden becomes the nominee.
How do the Dems expect young people who are marginalized by these rule changes to show up if say Biden becomes the nominee.
Its madness, they’re literally relying on high turn out and youth engagement due to gerrymandering and yet they are insisting on disenfranchising them.
Watch the video- he literally cannot win. Gerrymandering. It's Biden.
Can someone explain this, because there doesn't seem to be any connection between the tweet and the video in the tweet. It's a bit late to be complaining about a caucus of all things being a bad way to do things; that's been the case since about forever. Same with first past the post. It's bad, but it's always been bad, and it's always going to be bad.
the reduced weighing of college cities (which, according to the msnbc video, is new) means bernie's popular vote margin won't matter.
edit - also, iirc, other caucuses do not do this complicated weighing, it's based on a simple count.
If they screw him again I hope he runs as an independent this time. feck em.
If they screw him again I hope he runs as an independent this time. feck em.
What is this supposed to mean? That he won't run or that he won't win? The second one is obvious to everyone , and the first: no one really knows , depends on how all of this unfolds and how many bridges are burned in the process.
Then they should stop trying to screw him over
the reduced weighing of college cities (which, according to the msnbc video, is new) means bernie's popular vote margin won't matter.
What is this supposed to mean? That he won't run or that he won't win? The second one is obvious to everyone , and the first: no one really knows , depends on how all of this unfolds and how many bridges are burned in the process.
I'm not getting that from that video. What is new is that they are releasing three different sets of numbers, seemingly for transparency. It doesn't say anything about the skewed weighting being new, just that, well, it's skewed.
Fixed it for yaremember Hillary complaining about anybody running against her.
1:00 to 1:25
Yes, I have seen the entire two minute video. It says the precints that accounted for 41% of the turnout in 2016 account for 32% of the delegates this year, but it doesn't say how large their portion of the delegates were in 2016. I'm not saying there's not anything here, but to be convinced that this means Trump 2020 and that the Dems are gerrymandering their own race and that Biden has already won... it takes a bit more than a brief comment in a short video. Do you have any other sources for this, what it actually means?
That trump would be very happy if Bernie chose to run as an independentWhat is this supposed to mean?
Hard not to outperform zeroTulsi and Deval Patrick outperforming early on
there's 2 major threats - warren on 2nd alignment and biden on this age shit. i think bernie gets the raw vote counts but that's not going to be enough.
Is that Billy Crystal on the far right of the picture?
Probably some underaged girlWonder who took the picture.. Or even better who said "ehhh.. I'm gonna sit this one out my dudes"
EpsteinWonder who took the picture.. Or even better who said "ehhh.. I'm gonna sit this one out my dudes"