The Firestarter
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 30,293
Seconded. He is the only one with an actual idea.Sanders is a good guy. Its just some of his supporters don't represent him well.
Seconded. He is the only one with an actual idea.Sanders is a good guy. Its just some of his supporters don't represent him well.
This is how they think though, and its why many of them don't seem to have the levels of contempt for Trump that normal Dems do.
WatThis is how they think though, and its why many of them don't seem to have the levels of contempt for Trump that normal Dems do.
Its not. No surprise to see you and NM pontificating smugly on things you dont understand though.
Time to bring out the classicsRemember when Bernie bros were criticizing Nationals fans for chanting Lock Him Up?
1 poll means nothing but holy feck I needed this
Time to bring out the classics
If you think it's stupid, I'll take it as a compliment.stupid post...not surprisingly.
If you think it's stupid, I'll take it as a compliment.
People like you are the reason the US and most of the world is fecked.
The world is on fire, but if you don't put it out MY way, I'll let it burn!
Look at me and my principles!
too many of these brain dead libertarians crawling out of the woodworks on here.
best to ignore.
I don't know of any libertarians here. Do you ?
you may have morphed into one yourself
first answer my question.
I don't see a question. Where is it ?
I can understand the other imbeciles who cannot look past their own noses.
Surprised this coming from you.
Did the Establishment Democratic party abandon much of what is Trump's base?
EDIT:
Trump is a con man and a crook.
I have more contempt for the Establishment Dems who did nothing for decades for working people.
They need to look hard at themselves.
I would say no. A vast majority of Trump supporters are standard GOP voters who have always voted Republican. Its why he has something like 90% support within the party at the moment. There may be a small number of independents who have been vacillating between both parties since the old days of "Reagan Democrats", who returned to the Dems under Obama, and again defected back to the GOP under Trump.
The broader reality is that both political parties have gradually drifted away from serving the people (Republicans far more so than Dems) but ultimately, both are culpable. This is why these sorts of insurgencies have emerged over the past 10 years - namely the Tea Party, and the Trump and Sanders juggernauts.
The one thing Sanders is doing that Trump did is bringing out people who did not vote before.
That wont happen with a Biden candidacy.
Well...something like half the country doesn't vote, so if he were to activate even a small percentage then he could win.
That is a real possibility.
Sanders has invested heavily in the early states.
My biggest concern is Climate Change. No one is proposing as much as Bernie.
That’s what I alluded to earlier. The ones working heavily on his campaign are certain he will bring the record voter turnout and I believe so too.Well...something like half the country doesn't vote, so if he were to activate even a small percentage then he could win.
when nm pulls a muscle from patting himself on the back too hard, he will be able to see a doctor for free thanks to president bernie sanders and medicare for all
We have to reduce this to RD’s pov. Consider me the benchmark centrist for a start and consider everyone to the right of me a capitalist libertarian.So who are the aforementioned libertarians on the forum that you speak of ?
In the classic video game Tetris you will often find that you have an opportunity to clear a line with the current piece. Upon noticing this the novice player will quickly take up this opportunity without any consideration of the consequences this will have on their overall build. This style of play is inefficient and dangerous.The sentiment is stupid.
How you aren't banned is beyond me.
If you read (which I don't think you do) my posts I said I'd vote for Bernie if I could. Then again, your more likely to complain than vote.
I don’t think that he is the Messiah some of his supporters make him to be, and I think that he has been a very ineffective senator. So I am not sure that he would even be a good president, unless Democrats control both chambers of the congress (and listen to him). I don’t have a doubt though that he is a good guy, and cares more about the people and how to help them than any other candidate I have ever seen in the US elections.Sanders is a good guy. Its just some of his supporters don't represent him well.
Brokered Convention?
Of course things can change quickly is a candidate gets momentum but from the outside looking in to me there seems a pretty good change that in the early states all of the top 4 will pick up some delegates and it also seems likley that they all have the cash (albeit some to a greater extent) to make it to super tuesday at which point Bloomberg and his ability to bombard half the country with adverts could even see delegates being split five ways in some states
Basically if they get through super Tuesday and the delegates have mostly been split 4 ways up to that point wont it be pretty difficult for anybody to get 50% of the delegates after that?
And in a brokered convention I guess Bloomberg has zero chance as he was a repbulican, bernie not much chance as an independent, pete probably not much...
Would they have to pick one of the nominees or could they just give it to hillary?
I really doubt it. Things change when you have the power to govern instead of being in opposition. Doing massive demonstration works when you are in opposition, not when you are president.One of Bernie’s Instagram posts confirms it for me: he will be the kind of President who will put extreme pressure on Congresspeople by leading massive rallies in their state/district. It really fits into the “not me, us” narrative that he’s been conveying. If you’re trying to judge his potential presidency by conventional means, then I can see why you might think he will be ineffective, but I will argue that you’re doing it wrong that way.
Some people may not like that style because it’s too in your face and out of the comfort zone. I get that. But, if making democracy work for you and getting the big money influences out of the way is something you value, then people are going to have to start participating in Democracy and do more than half assed attendance at general elections.
You won’t get that inspiration from Biden, Buttigieg, Warren, or even Yang. Only Bernie can lead people to immediate mass demonstrations and that is precisely because how passionate his base is.
Biden is a polished version of Trump. But Trump has done a lot of good too. He actually took off the facade of the American governments and politics. He showed the world what's it all about.
Bernie is probably the best one out of the lot.
Trump has been a tornado of BS and corruption. The only people who are happy with him are traditional US adversaries like Russia, and various other autocracies.
This is exactly what I am saying. He has taken it off the facade that USA is in it for humanitarian reasons. It never was for that. It was all for the sake of few people and companies. Just like Trump is in it for himself. The difference is that he has different interests. He has no Russian interest in it at all. It is all about himself. If someone else would get him benefits he would go there.
As for other autocracies, the Saudis lead everyone in this. This is the point. The US is in this for itself and Trump took the cover off and now everyone can see it for themselves.