- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,214
Shocking news
I still fail to see how there were grown up people who identify themselves as left/progressive/Democrat and were totally indifferent on past elections if Trump or Hillary won, with some of them actually going for Trump.
There is the time of protest, and there is the time to grown up. A lot of Bernie Bros' forgot to grown up. Same for Green Party.
I’d like to meet the 16% of Republicans who view Socialism positively.Democrats More Positive About Socialism Than Capitalism
https://news.gallup.com/poll/240725/democrats-positive-socialism-capitalism.aspx
Yep. I could understand a protest vote, even support it if it was a number of Republicans like Rubio, Kasich, Romney running. But Donald fecking trump should've been a big red flag. What's more galling to me is that people still think he had or has the support of half the country. Not even remotely true. His support is about 25% and everyone of them came out in 16, even the one that said on tv that Obama just sat at his desk in the White House while they flew planes in to the trade center. Half the electorate stayed at home, around 7 million more who voted for Obama in 08 and 12 thought a reality tv guy who has a fecking cloud of shit around him would bring that plant back from China and Sanders supporters stomped their feet because millions of dems decided the preferred the dem candidate in the dem primary.I still fail to see how there were grown up people who identify themselves as left/progressive/Democrat and were totally indifferent on past elections if Trump or Hillary won, with some of them actually going for Trump.
There is the time of protest, and there is the time to grown up. A lot of Bernie Bros' forgot to grown up. Same for Green Party.
I still fail to see how there were grown up people who identify themselves as left/progressive/Democrat and were totally indifferent on past elections if Trump or Hillary won, with some of them actually going for Trump.
There is the time of protest, and there is the time to grown up. A lot of Bernie Bros' forgot to grown up. Same for Green Party.
I am not saying to vote for a Democrat cause of love of Democratic party. I am saying to vote against Trump, a racist who everyone knew was going to get US immediately out of Paris agreement (while Hillary was planning to go aggressively in favor of green energy), a pathologic liar who was going to feck the country for a couple of decades with right wing supreme justices. And so on.for the millionth time, green party voters are not left wing democrats. they never would have voted for democrats. it shows a complete misunderstanding of them to scold them for not voting democrat.
I am not saying to vote for a Democrat cause of love of Democratic party. I am saying to vote against Trump, a racist who everyone knew was going to get US immediately out of Paris agreement (while Hillary was planning to go aggressively in favor of green energy), a pathologic liar who was going to feck the country for a couple of decades with right wing supreme justices. And so on.
Thing is, it never was Democrat vs Republican vs Green. In most cases, where not that much is at stake, Green (and extreme left wing) can stay at home or go third party cause the difference between a center left like Hillary or a center right like Romney or Bush is hardly that big, so what's the point, better to sleep or to give a protest vote. But this time it was fecking Trump, a lunatic even for lunatic standards.
So, I would say we got their point. They should now enjoy Trump.
for the millionth time, green party voters are not left wing democrats. they never would have voted for democrats. it shows a complete misunderstanding of them to scold them for not voting democrat.
She had on her platform to increase solar energy production by 700% and to produce enough energy from clean sources for all American houses within 10 years. Bullish and probably difficult but at least she was planning to do something.hillary aggressively in favor of green energy. come on
trump has still killed less people than bush has. the difference between trump and normal republican presidents isnt that big. they are all monsters, hes just less subtle
They're not a statitc, homogenous voting block either. Like Republicans and Dems, some Green Party voters may be hard core, some may be curious, and others may simply be left wing Dems crossing over because they don't like who the Dem nominee is. They are certainly a left wing party as you would be hard pressed to name many right of center people who are ardent Green Party connoisseurs.
She had on her platform to increase solar energy production by 700% and to produce enough energy from clean sources for all American houses within 10 years. Bullish and probably difficult but at least she was planning to do something.
Trump on the other hand was planning to leave Paris agreement, was a fan of fossil energy and of fracking. But yes, Hillary was the problem.
I guess enjoy Trump and global warming.
OK, candidate A promises to have as priority clean energy, candidate B promises to leave Paris agreement, and likes to produce more fossil energy.this is such a naive way of looking at things. if youve followed hillarys career in any meaningful way you would know she doesnt care about that in the least.
right but they arent the left wing of the democratic party. they are an entirely separate party with separate goals and platforms. republicans dont throw tantrums at libertarian voters when they lose, its only democrats who feel entitled to votes they couldnt secure with their candidates and their messaging
I don't know about that either. Going by the list of Green Party ideals you posted a couple of pages back, there would seem to be considerable crossover between the Greens and social democratic / liberal Dems
ecological wisdom
social justice
grassroots democracy
nonviolence
decentralization
community based economics
feminism
respect for diversity
personal and global responsibility
future focus
Given the obvious idealogical overlap, it wouldn't be at all surprising to learn that a left wing Dem, disenchanted by the prospects of voting Hillary, would instead opt for Stein.
OK, candidate A promises to have as priority clean energy, candidate B promises to leave Paris agreement, and likes to produce more fossil energy.
Logic of some people: it does not matter if A or B wins cause A might be lying. So let's sleep or vote some idiot or vote Trump. And then complain when Trump does exactly what he promised.
So they are like Democrat voters in California. There vote means feck all.for the millionth time, green party voters are not left wing democrats. they never would have voted for democrats. it shows a complete misunderstanding of them to scold them for not voting democrat.
Do you think Jill Stein discussed green energy at the table with Putin?hillary aggressively in favor of green energy. come on
trump has still killed less people than bush has. the difference between trump and normal republican presidents isnt that big. they are all monsters, hes just less subtle
But then your ilk by not voting to stop Trump, made possible for him to implement the policies which will make the earth cool and hundreds of millions of dead people in the name of capitalism. Congratulations!Logic of some people: let's nominate the worst candidate in the history of the country and then scold people for not voting for her. Then let's snipe from the sidelines at the people who are involved in teachers strikes and black lives matter and the fight for fifteen and direct opposition to nazism and organizing for tenants rights and against ice.
Those people are out there taking direct action to make the world better and you and your ilk will pay yourselves on the back for being reasonable until the earth cooks and hundreds of millions are dead and displaced in the name of capitalism and incrementalism.
Do you think Jill Stein discussed green energy at the table with Putin?
I never get over people blaming voters. comedy.
Here is a novel idea.
How about putting forward honest candidates who want to serve the vast majority and not the corporations?
That's ideal but it isn't always going to happen. Plenty of Republicans disliked Trump initially but fell in line because they were aware that he aligned closely with them on a lot of issues and could implement their general agenda.
Clinton herself may be vapid as feck and believe in nothing politically, but with some pressure she could've been dragged to the left ever so slightly on certain key issues when it came to the environment etc, and she certainly wouldn't have left the Paris Agreement. Another key one is SCOTUS - if Trump gets in another one or two appointments then it will be overwhelmingly conservative for decades to come, thus impeding any future left-wing admins on a whole range of issues. Hilary's choices may not exactly have been particularly left-wing, but would've been better than right-wing lunatics who, say, believe in no gun control whatsoever or who believe environmental policy to be intrusive.
I get it, she was crap. But she was clearly the better choice, and only alternative to, Trump. And for all her faults the 'both parties are the same' narrative doesn't work at all for me. I'd argue it's better to have someone in power I agree with on 40% of issues as opposed to someone I agree with on nothing at all.
Its This acceptance of the lesser evil for decades that has brought us Trump.
Never blame the voters. I know people who voted for Obama who then voted Trump. Even young people.
pure frustration and anger.
The fault directly lies with the Democratic party that has for decade abandoned ordinary people.
But then your ilk by not voting to stop Trump, made possible for him to implement the policies which will make the earth cool and hundreds of millions of dead people in the name of capitalism. Congratulations!
I get it, she was crap. But she was clearly the better choice, and only alternative to, Trump. And for all her faults the 'both parties are the same' narrative doesn't work at all for me. I'd argue it's better to have someone in power I agree with on 40% of issues as opposed to someone I agree with on nothing at all.
I'd agree with that, and I'd argue that the Dems need to recognise what's changed and adapt as a result of that by adopting a more left-wing platform. But at the same time I'll maintain Hilary was by far the most sensible choice post-primaries last year.
The Socialist platform that was put forward by Sanders was pushed aside by the corrupt party machinery that had already selected Hillary, the Corporate choice.
Obviously many angry voters chose to stay away or simply vote 3rd party or even Trump.
The DNC realised how angry people were and got Donna Brazille to spill the beans on what happened. Because they knew the crone was planning to run again. Biden was the Blocker too.
That wont happen now.
But hey. Talk about slamming shut the barn doors after the horses had bolted.
everything that has happened now is primarily the DNC's fault.
Oh. btw those outraged Republicans shaking their heads about Trumps racism.
They blew those dog whistles so loud everyone heard them.
Blame the lazy blacks for Welfare. Hispanisc for job losses.
The horror we see now was created by both parties.
Trump is simply the result. Not the problem.
Trump was pure uncut heroin for the republican base and they rallied like feck around him.Lesser of two evils did bring us Trump but largely because Republicans viewed him as a lesser of an evil than Hillary and more likely to get some of their agenda done with him in charge.
There are way more non voters than Green party voters. If everyone participated, we wouldn't be having this Green party discussion.
Probably because the former is so quick/easily convinced to accept someone as a moralist and intellectual.The right consists of indoctrinated drones. The left consists of people bickering amongst themselves about who is the greatest intellectual and moralist.
The former is much more effective when it comes to election.
I don't disagree at all. But until they get thrown out of power, why would they stop? And how much of the nonvoting population were prevented from voting compared to the population who just flat out didn't vote?If repubs didn't do their utmost to prevent poor people from voting, the Dems would be in power across the board.
Trump was pure uncut heroin for the republican base and they rallied like feck around him.
Just because you hate her, it doesn’t make Hillary ‘the worst candidate in the history of he country’. She got more votes than any candidate other than Obama ever got.Logic of some people: let's nominate the worst candidate in the history of the country and then scold people for not voting for her. Then let's snipe from the sidelines at the people who are involved in teachers strikes and black lives matter and the fight for fifteen and direct opposition to nazism and organizing for tenants rights and against ice.
Those people are out there taking direct action to make the world better and you and your ilk will pay yourselves on the back for being reasonable until the earth cooks and hundreds of millions are dead and displaced in the name of capitalism and incrementalism.
Just because you hate her, it doesn’t make Hillary ‘the worst candidate in the history of he country’. She got more votes than any candidate other than Obama ever got.
Population growth alone doesn’t explain the number of votes she received compared to Kerry