2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
Raoul said:
I could give two fecks who donated to the foundation. Its an organization that funds children's health and vaccines around the world so where the money comes from is completely irrelevant. In fact, the more they fleece the wealthy the better.
Click to expand...
:mad: couldn't!!
 
barros said:
Will be interesting seeing how much money from donations actually goes to help children.
Click to expand...

That's never been in question they have raised and given MILLIONS! all around the world. Unlike Drumpf, who has constantly lied about giving anything to charity, won't release his tax returns and has been found out for using his own Trump Foundation's money for himself for his own purchases, repairs on his own fountains even paying for his son $7 to join the scouts. You are skating on thin ice with this one.

Raoul said:
I could give two fecks who donated to the foundation. Its an organization that funds children's health and vaccines around the world so where the money comes from is completely irrelevant. In fact, the more they fleece the wealthy the better.
Click to expand...

You can deal with this one @Rado_N ;)
 
langster said:
That's never been in question they have raised and given MILLIONS! all around the world. Unlike Drumpf, who has constantly lied about giving anything to charity, won't release his tax returns and has been found out for using his own Trump Foundation's money for himself for his own purchases, repairs on his own fountains even paying for his son $7 to join the scouts. You are skating on thin ice with this one.



You can deal with this one @Rado_N ;)
Click to expand...

"For an organization that is supposedly a charity, the Clinton Foundation spent very little money on "direct aid." IRS documents showed that the Foundation raised over $500 million from 2009-2012, and yet the Clinton Foundation only spent $75 million on "programmatic grants."

"The other $425 million was allocated as follows: more than $25 million went for travel expenses; almost $110 million for employee salaries and benefits; and $290 million for 'other expenses,'" reports Discover The Networks.
 
barros said:
"For an organization that is supposedly a charity, the Clinton Foundation spent very little money on "direct aid." IRS documents showed that the Foundation raised over $500 million from 2009-2012, and yet the Clinton Foundation only spent $75 million on "programmatic grants."

"The other $425 million was allocated as follows: more than $25 million went for travel expenses; almost $110 million for employee salaries and benefits; and $290 million for 'other expenses,'" reports Discover The Networks.
Click to expand...
Well that's unsettling..
 
barros said:
"For an organization that is supposedly a charity, the Clinton Foundation spent very little money on "direct aid." IRS documents showed that the Foundation raised over $500 million from 2009-2012, and yet the Clinton Foundation only spent $75 million on "programmatic grants."

"The other $425 million was allocated as follows: more than $25 million went for travel expenses; almost $110 million for employee salaries and benefits; and $290 million for 'other expenses,'" reports Discover The Networks.
Click to expand...

Find a proper source like the NY Times, Washington Post etc.
 
barros said:
"For an organization that is supposedly a charity, the Clinton Foundation spent very little money on "direct aid." IRS documents showed that the Foundation raised over $500 million from 2009-2012, and yet the Clinton Foundation only spent $75 million on "programmatic grants."

"The other $425 million was allocated as follows: more than $25 million went for travel expenses; almost $110 million for employee salaries and benefits; and $290 million for 'other expenses,'" reports Discover The Networks.
Click to expand...

:lol: #Scrapingthebarrel
 
Raoul said:
I could give two fecks who donated to the foundation. Its an organization that funds children's health and vaccines around the world so where the money comes from is completely irrelevant. In fact, the more they fleece the wealthy the better.
Click to expand...
In majority of third world countries, international charity work is backed by foreign government donations.
Govts don't tend to write each other donation cheques, the money is put directly into charities that have established networks to effect in those countries.
 
KikiDaKats said:
In majority of third world countries, international charity work is backed by foreign government donations.
Govts don't tend to write each other donation cheques, the money is put directly into charities that have established networks to effect in those countries.
Click to expand...

Well that makes sense.
 
unchanged_lineup said:
Have you read some of the other parts of that site? :wenger:
Click to expand...

Another hallmark of classical liberalism was its spirit of toleration for divergent beliefs and ideas, and of respect for individual freedom of thought. Yet in modern leftism, we find precisely the opposite: intolerance of opposing viewpoints, and the promotion of group-think. The left interprets as treason any deviation from its own intellectual orthodoxy, if exhibited by a member of a so-called “victim” group who theoretically ought to occupy a place in the phalanx of revolutionary agitators. We see this phenomenon manifested with particular clarity by black leftists who excoriate black conservatives as “race traitors,” “house slaves,” “Oreos,” and “Uncle Toms.”

Wow! Reading some of it now, it's downright scary. Ultimate fruit-loop brainwashing Alex Jones style bullshite. Feck me! Unbelievable people believe this shit. @barros you should be truly ashamed for quoting from something like that. Seriously I worry about you if you use sites like that. Funnily enough the programme i'm watching on BBC2 right now would be right up your street.
 
0COC1q4.png
 
langster said:
Another hallmark of classical liberalism was its spirit of toleration for divergent beliefs and ideas, and of respect for individual freedom of thought. Yet in modern leftism, we find precisely the opposite: intolerance of opposing viewpoints, and the promotion of group-think. The left interprets as treason any deviation from its own intellectual orthodoxy, if exhibited by a member of a so-called “victim” group who theoretically ought to occupy a place in the phalanx of revolutionary agitators. We see this phenomenon manifested with particular clarity by black leftists who excoriate black conservatives as “race traitors,” “house slaves,” “Oreos,” and “Uncle Toms.”

Wow! Reading some of it now, it's downright scary. Ultimate fruit-loop brainwashing Alex Jones style bullshite. Feck me! Unbelievable people believe this shit. @barros you should be truly ashamed for quoting from something like that. Seriously I worry about you if you use sites like that. Funnily enough the programme i'm watching on BBC2 right now would be right up your street.
Click to expand...

Read the stuff about The Arts for your Alex Jones fix :O
 
Mrs Smoker said:
0COC1q4.png
Click to expand...


I think that's the same monkey that writes that site barros just quoted from. That primate sure knows his shit, when he's not throwing it around his cage and spreading it all over his own face that is.

unchanged_lineup said:
Read the stuff about The Arts for your Alex Jones fix :O
Click to expand...

On it now, thanks. (I think) :wenger:
 
BBC I-Player - Trump's Unlikely Superfans :lol:

Check it out if you can, it's excellent so far, and thItse girl presenting it is very pretty with a beautiful Irish accent so that makes it all the better. She's just rocked up at a Trump rally and asked how much the Trump t-shirts are, some lady just said $15 and when asked where they were made she said "Haiti because that's where all wall-marts tees are made" "I thought this was all about making America great again" :lol: Interestingly though it's in North Carolina, and it's certainly not as busy as what I would expect, I mean the arena looks busy, but the floor is less than half full and Trump is saying there are thousands outside trying to get in :wenger:. I distinctly remember that's not how it was reported on Faux News. It doesn't add up.
 
Ole's_toe_poke said:
Is this good or bad as compared to early voting in 12?

In theory Trump should be winning these states easily if he has to have any chance.
Click to expand...

I usually ignore the compared to 2012 or 2008 type comparisons, mainly because Trump is such an unusual candidate this time. He is drawing support from strange groups like blue collar Democrats and Hillary is drawing immense support among a brand new surging Hispanic demographic.

All I look for is whether Clinton and Trump are close in terms of percentage relative to who is expected to win the state in question. The numbers in GA and AZ are encouraging imo.
 
Help needed

Trying to get to grips with polls here. What is that site which gives the polling companies a rating?
 
Raoul said:
I usually ignore the compared to 2012 or 2008 type comparisons, mainly because Trump is such an unusual candidate this time. He is drawing support from strange groups like blue collar Democrats and Hillary is drawing immense support among a brand new surging Hispanic demographic.

All I look for is whether Clinton and Trump are close in terms of percentage relative to who is expected to win the state in question. The numbers in GA and AZ are encouraging imo.
Click to expand...

I listened to a spot on Irish radio this afternoon where they were talking to some American professor about it for 20 mins, and it was the most ill-informed amount of garbage I've heard during the whole cycle :D There was loads of misrepresentation precisely from comparisons to previous elections, the type highlighted a few pages back in this thread.
 
langster said:
:lol:

Is anyone else watching this Trump programme on BBC2? For fecks sake. Ann Coulter saying "I don't like liars" Un-fecking-believable!
Click to expand...

She's evil. There are people in politics I disagree with, people I dislike, people I think are misguided but Ann Coulter definitely tortured animals as a child.
 
Ivor Ballokov said:
She's evil. There are people in politics I disagree with, people I dislike, people I think are misguided but Ann Coulter definitely tortured animals as a child.
Click to expand...

Oh I agree. I can't stand her. Her and Hannity are probably the two I dislike the most, and that Michelle Malkin thing too.

Rado_N said:
Oh lordy
Click to expand...

What did I say? :nervous:
 
https://mic.com/articles/158539/mel...n-this-time-it-was-trump-s-ex-wife#.V4UtgHOck

:lol: :lol: :lol:

You really couldn't make this shit up. New Wife caught plagiarizing ex-wife. For fecks sake. Priceless!

Actually the more I think about it, quoting his ex and speaking about America becoming cruel and online trolling. Surely she was wumming and trolling her own husband. Surely. And as I said before, no way his campaign thought any of it was a good idea. Truly laughable.
 
Nikhil said:
Click to expand...

This is so true, as fecking utterly stupid and meme worthy as Trump is and look how close he has got to President (he may still even win). Imagine if someone who had half a brain, was articulate, properly educated and had heavy alt right ideals, he would of swept this election campaign. HRC is lucky in a sense she didn't come across true opposition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.