Agreed, it's America though and those pharmaceutical companies have enormous sway.
Which is why they don't have Universal Healthcare!
Agreed, it's America though and those pharmaceutical companies have enormous sway.
Yep, that and the fact that half the country think helping society's most vulnerable people is communist evil.Which is why they don't have Universal Healthcare!
Just be glad it wasn't your elbow.I've seen those regularly. May cause diarrhea, heart attacks, Panic attacks, dry throat, muscle spasms, infertility, cancer, suicidal thoughts, bleeding of the brain or maybe even death.
feck me I only had the flu
It's not just the ads either, it's doctors getting money when they prescribe a particulars drugs. That's one of the worst conflicts of interest possible.
Yep, that and the fact that half the country think helping society's most vulnerable people is communist evil.
Some former FBI's agents and directors didn't like the way he deal with Hillary emails and maybe is a way to frame him,Or maybe republican pressure or influence of some sort persuaded him to publish?
Just be glad it wasn't your elbow.
It's hilarious, UK doctors get a bonus when they get someone to go to the gym, or give up smoking. In the States, it's when they get them to take some new wonderdrug.
Yup, it's disgusting! I would love to debate anyone over UHC. Trump, anyone! I'd gladly argue with any of them.
TRUMP SERIOUSLY just said that the NFL viewing numbers are down because of him!
It's hilarious, UK doctors get a bonus when they get someone to go to the gym, or give up smoking. In the States, it's when they get them to take some new wonderdrug.
Is that true...an actual policy?
Thats good.Yeah it's true, I think they get £80 per person when they join a gym and more when they give up smoking.
Thats good.
Do liquor store owners get a bonus when they make someone an alcoholic
no, obviously not, and I see where you are coming from, but in this day and age it needed a new look and this seemed to work. It's not perfect, but paying a doctor £80 for helping someone give up ciggies saves them ££££ in operations years down the line.
And makes the NHS impossible to fund due to the pensions cost of people not dying young from smoking.no, obviously not, and I see where you are coming from, but in this day and age it needed a new look and this seemed to work. It's not perfect, but paying a doctor £80 for helping someone give up ciggies saves them ££££ in operations years down the line.
And makes the NHS impossible to fund due to the pensions cost of people not dying young from smoking.
Indeed. I just feel the need to point out that smoking saves the government far more money than it costs in cancer treatment or indeed any other treatment for related health conditions.You can't win either way, either you spend hundreds of thousands with cancer treatment or you pay to help people stop smoking. There needs to be a balance, and the plain fact of the matter is I and millions of other people would rather have an NHS than not. The American alternative is not sane, ethical, fair nor is it acceptable. We could sit and debate the problems with the NHS forever, but one thing I think everyone would agree on is it's better to argue its failings and faults rather than argue its existence.
Trump just said that as soon as he is elected he will "TERMINATE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF OBAMAS EXECUTIVE ORDERS" and "reverse every policy he has ever made" FFS
Janet Jacksons tit started a firestorm yet I have to watch an advertisement for boner pills for old bastards while having a late breakfast with my children, it's enough to cure my opioid constipation.It should be basically illegal to advertise prescription drugs directly to the public, for all sorts of reasons.
It's incredible how he believes he'll be able to do literally anything he wants, unchallenged and without dispute.
I'm sure they spend way more money fighting cancer than paying pensions.And makes the NHS impossible to fund due to the pensions cost of people not dying young from smoking.
Not smoking related cancer, no, not remotely.I'm sure they spend way more money fighting cancer than paying pensions.
I agree mate, but not only that it's how he thinks (and his supporters think) that everything Obama has done is bad. It makes me so angry, literally fuming how he bangs on about how America is perceived in the world since Obama has been in charge. He really doesn't get that the world LOVES Obama! And that America's popularity around the world has grown so much since Obama has been in charge and also how hated Drumpf is, and how the world see's Drumpf! America's popularity would be at a record all time low if he gets elected, not to mention it would be a laughing stock.
But on top of that, it irritates me how Drumpf can argue about Obama's record, and how much better things are in the USA and he constantly attacks Obama and the USA and nobody stands up and puts him right. It's so infuriating.
There is no possible way Trump believes this. It's all vote baiting huffing and puffing.It's incredible how he believes he'll be able to do literally anything he wants, unchallenged and without dispute.
And makes the NHS impossible to fund due to the pensions cost of people not dying young from smoking.
There is no possible way Trump believes this. It's all vote baiting huffing and puffing.
If the world ends and he is elected into office then he becomes a sitting duck president waiting out the four years.
In my opinion the danger for America is waiting 4 years to get things done rather than Trump bringing in a Nazi regime to government.
But you're not paying for the bad choices of others. My bad choices save money by killing me.That's not really how either the NHS or cancer works, tbf. Not to mention that alcohol costs the NHS way more, on a daily basis.
It's also the kind of arguments used by those opposed to universal healthcare. "Why should I pay for the bad choices/mistakes of others!" Etc..
I'm sure they spend way more money fighting cancer than paying pensions.
Yeah, this sense of "everything my opponent does is bad" is really, really unhelpful in general political discourse and actually quite childish. I'm not expecting him to praise Obama...but there should be some willingness to realise that not every policy he's implemented will have been awful.
My own small pet theory is that if he wins the election, he'll become bored within two weeks and resign. I don't think he understands that the job will involve lots of long, drawn-out meetings, haggling with people around him, compromise and difficulty, and that it's generally a difficult, time-consuming, and probably even tedious job with lots of public appearances he won't want to put in. He's shown he doesn't have a great attention span, so a job like this will be something he'd end up hating, probably.
But you're not paying for the bad choices of others. My bad choices save money by killing me.
I'm not sure I really understand what you were saying, then, in that case.True. It's a ridiculous argument.
Dying of a smoking relates illness is pretty expensive (unless you just ignore it, I guess).But you're not paying for the bad choices of others. My bad choices save money by killing me.
Not compared to living to the age you otherwise would've done.Dying of a smoking relates illness is pretty expensive (unless you just ignore it, I guess).
I'm not sure I really understand what you were saying, then, in that case.
Fair enough.Im not either really. I was responding to a post in isolation...Should probably stop doing that.
And drinking on Sundays.
Which is why they don't have Universal Healthcare!
Fair enough.
I should probably stop taking us off topic with irrelevant attempts to justify my smoking.
I agree, he doesn't have a clue about what it entails, but in that respect he's made it clear he doesn't have a clue about anything. He really doesn't understand much at all. He's a fecking moron, and we can only hope sanity prevails and Hillary is elected. I will debate what Trump will or wont do if he wins, until then, I'd rather just pretend he wont.