2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, it's sadly been a bit quiet today, even Denald hasn't been posting much either. :(
Denald needed a pause from his weekend activities. He was on a roll then!


Not sure if posted, NY Times dedicated two full pages to print all of Trump's insults. Only on Twitter. Since he started campaigning.
Cvidfd9WgAAXlAb.jpg

Here's the the page with live links to his Twitter page: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html

:wenger::wenger:
:lol:


:lol: Is this Hillary's 'real' account?!
 
Last edited:
In a scorching statement, former NSA and CIA Director Michael Hayden blasted Fox News host Sean Hannity for his newfound love of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. “In 10 yrs @wikileaks has gotten nothing wrong & no one’s been killed bc of the info released. #freejulianassange #freeinternet for all,” Hannity tweeted over the weekend, continuing his recent trend of praising the man he once said was “waging war” on the U.S. and deserved to be arrested. In response, Hayden told Brookings Institute senior fellow Benjamin Wittes in a statement: “Hannity has entered the pantheon of a true propagandist.” Additionally, he wrote, “Fox News has almost entirely jumped the shark. They have given up any semblance of conservatism and focused on an almost visceral hatred of all things Clinton and Obama.” The four-star general—who has served in positions under Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama—concluded that Hannity reminds him a Bulgarian political official he met in the 1980s who, when asked what truth is, told Hayden, “Truth is what serves the party.”
Sadly, Fox News viewers and/or Trumpites would fully embrace the position of the Bulgarian guy.
German media reports now in more depth about the US election. A team of reporters interviewed Trumpites in Florida, and I can't stop shaking my head. So much hate and aggression, totally immune to facts. It would be funny if it wasn't so, so sad.
 
I guess he was using the wrong intonation. It should've been nasty person.

Like, 'nasty girl, nasty girl, livin' in her own little nasty world.'
 
Watching Hannity is great entertainment in the morning. What I like is that he doesn't even try to be objective or pretend he's trying to get to the real story. Republicans are great. Democrats are evil and stupid. Simple as that.

It's easy to see why Republicans who get their news exclusively from Fox hate the Dems and the Clintons so much.
 
What kind of source has a headline that's as big as the whole article?

This kind..

https://www.minds.com/blog/view/630876285924548626

Tbf, the O'Keefe video has been discussed a lot in mainstream circles. The video in the link is from CNN after all. Which raises the question why anyone would link to that joke of a site rather than just post the vide.... Oh yeah, the unsubstantiated claim of "massive voter fraud" and links to Watergate ... that's why.

Pretty sure @MoBeats is a WUM at this point.
 
Last edited:
This kind..

https://www.minds.com/blog/view/630876285924548626

Tbf, the O'Keefe video has been discussed a lot in mainstream circles. The video in the link is from CNN after all. Which raises the question why anyone would link to that joke of a site rather than just post the vide.... Oh yeah, the unsubstantiated claim of "massive voter fraud" and links to Watergate ... that's why.

Pretty sure @MoBeats is a WUM at this point.

fecking hell :lol: Come on @MoBeats I like a good conspiracy myself, but you have to do better than using a source like that.

Link doesn't seem to work for me, as I oppened it it said "Man stoped masturbating for 700 days and received mind superpowers" ...but it was the same site :D
 
Like Watergate :lol:

And the thing is, this story is out at exactly the same time The Telegraph's investigation is revealing that Trump SuperPACs had no qualms taking $2m from a Chinese investor, even detailing to them how to shell it and hide the trail.

Duck costume vs. $2m of foreign money. :rolleyes:

If this is the Trump campaign's idea of mitigation, it is just another example of how utterly piss-poor amateur hour his campaign has been. No doubt it's been driven by his ego to latch on to this duck thing because of how much he hates his own first name :lol:

Still though, it has given us the hashtag #ducksoutforhillary....
 
Very much looking forward to seeing what the early voting numbers are going to be like...
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-clinton-florida-230275
Florida spirals away from Trump
With the GOP nominee trailing in poll after poll and lacking a ground game, a low turnout may be Trump's only hope of carrying the state.

From polling to early voting trends to TV ad spending to ground game, Donald Trump’s Florida fortunes are beginning to look so bleak that some Republicans are steeling themselves for what could be the equivalent of a “landslide” loss in the nation’s biggest battleground state.

Trump has trailed Hillary Clinton in 10 of the 11 public polls conducted in October — according to POLITICO’s Battleground States polling average, Clinton has a 3.4 point lead. Even private surveys conducted by Republican-leaning groups show Trump’s in trouble in Florida, where a loss would end his White House hopes.

“On the presidential race we’ve found Clinton with a consistent 3% - 5% lead in surveys that attempt to reflect Florida’s actual electorate,” Ryan D. Tyson, vice president of political operations for the Associated Industries of Florida business group wrote in a confidential memo emailed to his conservative-leaning members this weekend and obtained by POLITICO.

Though Clinton’s lead is “within the margin of error for this survey, we would suggest that 3% really isn’t as close as it may seem in the state of Florida,” Tyson wrote, estimating a turnout of as much as 71 percent, or as many as 9.2 million Florida voters overall. If that happens and the polling margins hold, Clinton’s raw vote lead over Trump could end up being 275,000 to 460,000 votes.

“This is in all reality a landslide in our great state,” Tyson wrote, echoing the concerns of numerous Florida Republican insiders and experts. “Based on his consistent failure to improve his standing with non-white voters, voters under 50 and females, it seems fairly obvious to us that Mr. Trump’s only hope left in Florida is a low turnout.”

Trump has reacted to the steady drip of troubling numbers by launching an unprecedented seven-city Florida tour this week while simultaneously denying the data dispiriting many in his party.

“We are winning and the press is refusing to report it. Don't let them fool you- get out and vote! #DrainTheSwamp on November 8th!” Trump wrote on his Twitter account Monday morning before an event with farmers near West Palm Beach, where he repeated to the crowd, “I believe we are actually winning.”

Hours earlier, Trump took to Twitter to say that “the Dems are making up phony polls in order to suppress” his vote share.

But polls are just one reason why Florida Republicans are alarmed. Mail-in absentee ballot voting was once a Republican strength thanks to the party’s organization and years of conditioning its members to vote by mail. But this year, Democrats are showing signs of catching up.
 
Hang on, if Trump #DrainsTheSwamp where will the ducks be able to swim?
 
Could this story be a teaser for something bigger to come out later this week?

But both men also put Donald Trump in the room with cocaine, very young women and underage girls, and rich, old men there to—pardon my language, but if the Times can say pussy on its front page, I can say this—feck them.

Young models were attracted to the fêtes with a simple, time-tested pitch. “You’ll meet rich guys who will help you,” says the photographer. “It was networking, but on a weird, bizarre scale.”

The girls were as young as 15, he says, and “over their heads, they had no idea, and they ended up in situations. There were always dramas because the men threw money and drugs at them to keep them enticed. It’s based on power and dominating girls who can’t push back and can be discarded. There’s always someone to pick them back up. Nobody wants to call home and say ‘Help me.’”

Trump would “go from room to room,” said the photographer, who added that “I was there to party myself. It was guys with younger girls, sex, a lot of sex, a lot of cocaine, top-shelf liquor” but no smoking. Trump didn’t approve of cigarettes.

Those men at these parties often knew each other. “It’s a small community,” the photographer says. “They exchanged information, facilitated each other. Trump was in and out. He’d wander off with a couple girls. I saw him. He was getting laid like crazy. Trump was at the heart of it. He loved the attention and in private, he was a total fecking beast.”

But did he have sex with his female party guests? “So, he’s a man with a woman,” Lucchesi says vaguely. How old were they? “A lot of girls, 14, look 24. That’s as juicy as I can get. I never asked how old they were; I just partook. I did partake in activities that would be controversial, too.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ng-models.html



 
Answer being "no, mo, sorry, too busy looking at the rest of the site in a desperate bid to discredit you to actually watch the article".
So here's a direct link.

 
The polling average is about 5-6 % at the moment, which is closer to where the final numbers will be imo.

How is that even possible? Trump makes Thatcher seem cuddly and at least she was competent at doing what she thought was right. He seems downright incompetent not to mention despicable. Anything less than a 15-20 margin for Clinton makes the US seem a laughing stock.
 
I watched the video. I am not sure how it means the election is rigged.

I mean, Jeffrey Lord cited the Watergate break-in. Surely that didn't mean McGovern had a win snatched away from him in 72?
 
Answer being "no, mo, sorry, too busy looking at the rest of the site in a desperate bid to discredit you to actually watch the article".
So here's a direct link.



Ok, I'll bite.

explain to me, in plain terms, how is it 'rigged'.

Provoking racists, xenophobes and violent thugs to out themselves as racists, xenophobes and violent thugs is 'rigging'?
 
Answer being "no, mo, sorry, too busy looking at the rest of the site in a desperate bid to discredit you to actually watch the article".
So here's a direct link.



Watched it twice now. I'm still trying to find where it proves an immense level of voter fraud or is like Watergate, as the article suggested. A Trump supporting commentator suggests the latter, unfoundedly. So what?

Have you watched it?
 
Last edited:
Ok, I'll bite.

explain to me, in plain terms, how is it 'rigged'.

Provoking racists, xenophobes and violent thugs to out themselves as racists, xenophobes and violent thugs is 'rigging'?

:lol: He's got to be on the WUM! A bit of campaign skulduggery? sure, enticing cnuts to reveal themselves as cnuts? definitely, but rigging a campaign? :lol: Not even fecking close.
 
How is that even possible? Trump makes Thatcher seem cuddly and at least she was competent at doing what she thought was right. He seems downright incompetent not to mention despicable. Anything less than a 15-20 margin for Clinton makes the US seem a laughing stock.

40-45% of the country vote Republican irrespective of who the Republican candidate is. Elections are more about preserving or advancing the identity of a particular demographic than the substance of the candidate. In that sense, Trump and the right wing character he invented, are merely being used by his supporters to stay relevant at a time when they are becoming the minority in terms of population.
 
Watched it twice now. I'm still trying to find where it proves an immense level of voter fraud or is like Watergate, as the article suggested. A Trump supporting commentator suggests the latter, unfoundedly. So what?

Have you watched it?

I would just like to say that I have watched it too. So, yeah. Let's hear it.
 
40-45% of the country vote Republican irrespective of who the Republican candidate is. Elections are more about preserving or advancing the identity of a particular demographic than the substance of the candidate. In that sense, Trump and the right wing character he invented, are merely being used by his supporters to stay relevant at a time when they are becoming the minority in terms of population.

People need to hang their heads in shame.
 
40-45% of the country vote Republican irrespective of who the Republican candidate is. Elections are more about preserving or advancing the identity of a particular demographic than the substance of the candidate. In that sense, Trump and the right wing character he invented, are merely being used by his supporters to stay relevant at a time when they are becoming the minority in terms of population.
I hate how politics are basically like supporting a football team. You support your team through thick and thin irrespective of how shit the current batch of politicians are. It's so stupid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.