Ive not read through the 800 pages of this thread.
Is anyone actually supporting Trump on the caf?
Is anyone actually supporting Trump on the caf?
2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
I love the way that something in this thread can be discussed for a few pages and then all of a sudden someone comes in and posts something about it as if it hasn't even been mentioned beforeDunno if they just don't agree with what's been said prior and want to start their own tangent, or if they just don't read back before posting. It's truly bizarre and seems to happen a lot in here
Yeah this thread moves too quickly I'd say for folks who drop in and out to keep track of, especially when something big happens... For me, this is pretty much the only thread I read nowadays on the whole forum, apart from dropping in on the Corbyn/Westminster ones from time to time.
This thread has moved into the realm of megathread most likely, I did suggest starting a new one after the primaries I think...
They seem to have disappeared a long time ago.
Pretty strong evidence in favour of the theory that demographics, not the candidates, is the deciding factor in the race.
The guy has also been caught selectively editing things in the past. There's a good reason why they won't take his reporting as trustworthy.
Plus, they'll just go for exactly what is said in the video, plausible deniability. Unless the Hillary-in-the-room links come out, they'll bluff through whatever revelations there are. There's not enough time left to make this into a bombshell, whereas with The Donald it's merely adding layers to his now already-exploded-scattered-fragments-of-a-dumpster-fire.
"I'm telling you folks she wouldn't be my first choice, have a look folks, no way".
Everything he does disgusts me at this stage.
Even without the recent revelations about Trump and women, even underage ones, that video would still be creepy.
Anti-Trump female protestors now carrying placards saying: "Keep your tiny hands off me"
I genuinely said "nooooooooo!" outloud after seeing this.
Who lets their child this close to him? Ugh imagine growing up and seeing this in 10 years time, i'd have to move out.
He probably imagines he'll be dating her in 10 years time.
Becoming more Alex Jones-like by the day...
That hashtag Is it because Obama mentioned something about a swamp in that last speech??
Is it because Obama mentioned something about a swamp in that last speech??Aaaaand Paddy Power are trolling him
I'd vote for Trump so long as he promises to nuke Paddy Power.
Hillary stole State Department furniture.
Lock her up!
Lock her up!
To give some background, he's been searching for any donations to charities by Trump by calling as many as he possibly can. Up to 399 now.
Though he may have been quoting Pelosi also. Double oops.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/06/AR2006100600056.html
Before that is was Ronald Reagan and before that is was used by a few in the early 1900's
http://www.redstate.com/diary/barry...he-swamp-mother-jones-reagan-rumsfeld-pelosi/
Essentially, the use of the phrase Drain the Swamp is traceable to many. There is even an urban legend that Washington DC was built on swamp land.
Trump is still an idiot though.
Saddam did it in the marshes of southern Iraq as well, to punish and weed out rebels in the early 90s.
I have heard that New Orleans, Chicago, parts of NY City, St Petersburg in Russia and many others were also built in part on swamp land.
Drumpf is hitting the Wikileaks stuff hard. Desperate times I suppose. Should be a barnstormer of a debate tomorrow night.
Might have to watch it but not sure I can stomach listening to him for that long.
Drink every time he says 'believe me'.
Is Hallie Jackson up the duff? Did she do it to stop him from going for her?
I'll probably die of alcohol poisoning. Oh I see your plan......
Market movements apparently don't like polls where Hillary's polls go down and Trump's go up...
That's no surprise, markets hate volatility.
I keep reading that Trump is going hard after Clinton because of the Wikileaks info and of course threatening to put her in jail, but shouldn't all the information from Wikileaks be inadmissible anyway since it was illegally obtained. I suppose I should never expect Trump to take the high ground but the media seem to gloss over this fact as well.
Its all nonsense. If there was anything legit there, the mainstream media would be all over it instead of the fringe nutter sites like infowars, Breitbart, and the Drumpf campaign. He is completely desperate and throwing every piece of shite available at the wall in the hope that something sticks.
I feel sorry for anyone who reads this site regularly. It's borderline insane. I was reading through it last night for reference points and their narrative is lunacy.
Breitbart will probably wind up the digital arm of Trump TV once its off the ground. The web site will do the dirty work, then "journos on Trump TV will pick it up as if a credible outlet has already reported it and it will be discussed as if its a real story. Pretty much the Fox News model where the news people pick up on narratives flogged by the like of Hannity and O'Reilly.
Mugs and T-Shirts straight from a clan rally.
I think it's worse than Fox News, because from what I can tell, they spin their narratives based on whatever is the leading topic on conservative boards (4chan/reddit). It essentially tries to legitimize conspiracy.
When was the last time Kentucky went Blue? Within striking distance apparently.
http://www.babbagecofounder.com/2016/10/18/paul-steady-trump-falls-maintain-leads-latest-poll/
http://www.babbagecofounder.com/2016/10/18/paul-steady-trump-falls-maintain-leads-latest-poll/
I'm not sure which is the worst item. It's all ridiculous.
- Status