2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.


The ultimate insult, Biden would rather debate Palin than Trump, because Trump would be too easy :lol:

BOOM! I hope Trump hears about that one, jeez that's a low blow. Talking of Palin, notice how she slid off quietly after endorsing Trump and that completely cuckoo speech she made at the rally after doing so?
 
So, I've skimmed through that article, is there actually anything there awful? The parts that will certainly be taken up seem to have rebuttals in the context they were given.
I don't think that there wasn't anything really noteworthy. From what I've heard and read about Clinton's character and work, she had become more cautious and rationale over time - what I consider a trait for a president. When Bill ran for the first time for office, HRC came across more emotional, more spontaneous as compared to now - and she got slapped for it.
I find her realistic view on Russia - you have to deal with them, Putin won't go away - that'sreassuring, neither scandalous nor frightening.

The story about Putin is one also she shared once in a townhall meeting on CNN with Christiane Amanpour when she presented her book - in which she shared the story, too. Her 'public' and 'private' stance on Russia/Putin is actually very similar:

AMANPOUR: Yes. So but you write in your book something pretty funny. You talk about going to see Putin on something. Anyway, he takes you into this office and he then asks if Bill Clinton would like to go tagging polar bears in the arctic.

CLINTON: Yes.
AMANPOUR: Really macho, right?
CLINTON: Yes. Yes.
AMANPOUR: And you say, well, I'll see about his schedule, but otherwise, I'll go.
(LAUGHTER)
CLINTON: I did.
AMANPOUR: Yes, but the funny is that he gave you a funny look.
CLINTON: Yes.
AMANPOUR: As if this woman...
CLINTON: Yes. Yes...
AMANPOUR: Right?
CLINTON: -- well, he and I have...
AMANPOUR: (INAUDIBLE).
CLINTON: -- a -- a long distance verbal volleying relationship... (LAUGHTER) -- you know, most recently, the volley came from him and I've been trying to return it to him.
AMANPOUR: That was over Ukraine?
CLINTON: It was over -- well, it was over Ukraine. And I have criticized him for the invasion and annexation of Crimea and the continuing destabilization of Eastern Ukraine, which I think is very dangerous and -- and just plain wrong in -- in 2014, for European countries to be doing that. And also that I believe Russia has missed a great opportunity to really modernize its economy, not be dependent upon oil and gas, open it up more so it's not just, you know, in the possession of some of the oligarchs and -- and cronies of Putin's and not -- and so much else.
Yes, so he -- he and I go back and forth.

But that was a moment when I was able to make a connection with him. And that's why I write about it, because he always comes with an agenda. And if you ever see him on TV or in pictures, you know, he sits, you know, very kind of in a -- in a -- in a very aggressive way and just listens and sort of stares at you. And he never really agrees or has anything like a back and forth conversation. It's very dismissive.

So this had been going on with me in one of my meetings with him. But I knew that he cared about something I care about, which is wildlife conservation, particularly of endangered species.

So I -- I -- out of the blue, we were talking about something that he was not happy to be talking about. And I finally said, well, you know, President Putin, I understand that you are trying to save the tigers and the polar bears and other endangered species.

And he came awake. He sat up. He said come with me. He marched me out of the room. We went down the stairs, down the long hall into an office that surprised all of his security people, who jumped up, into an inner sanctum, just he and I. And we went way back to this room where he had this enormous map of Russia. And he said, let me show you where those endangered species are. And he was telling me about the tigers in Siberia and the polar bears and all that.

And then he said, I'm going to go up and tag them and -- and do you think your husband, Bill Clinton, would like to come?
And I said, well, I don't know, I'll ask him, but he's pretty busy. But, you know, I'll come if -- if he can't. The -- it was not reciprocated.
(LAUGHTER)
AMANPOUR: Yes, but that's my point. If you were president and a woman, it would be weird to deal with him, do you think?
CLINTON: No, because I think you have to deal with him with a combination of patience and persistence and strength. And therefore, it's -- changeup is not all bad, trying to figure out how you can find any common ground. I mean we have to stand our ground against him and his recent behavior. But we also need to keep trying to find common ground.
 
Fortunately they more or less only exist in states Trump will win any way.
They actually exist in all the states, it's just they are outnumbered in states with big cities. What's sad is that folks like these for all their faults (and there are many) do have legitimate concerns. It's just unfortunate they have chosen a crazed lunatic to champion their position. I hope in 2020 they can find a reasonable candidate to hear their voices because the status quo is not the answer.
 
They actually exist in all the states, it's just they are outnumbered in states with big cities. What's sad is that folks like these for all their faults (and there are many) do have legitimate concerns. It's just unfortunate they have chosen a crazed lunatic to champion their position. I hope in 2020 they can find a reasonable candidate to hear their voices because the status quo is not the answer.

I'm talking about eastern Kentucky / West Virginia type hillbillies.
 
So who is going to play Donald in the upcoming movie about this campaign? I guess Alec Baldwin could play it straight, he certainly has the chops.
 
My fear is that people like these aren't reflected in the polls.
Mine, too. The blind enthusiasm and hypocrisy on Twitter from Trumpites is overwhelming. Thousands of them were at FL rallies yesterday. I sincerely hope that pollsters have done their homework.
 
I'm talking about eastern Kentucky / West Virginia type hillbillies.
Does hillbilly = deplorable? The reason Hillary took so much heat for that comment and also a big reason for the rise of Donald Trump is that although an awful lot of these folks hold untenable positions on many subjects they also do have legitimate concerns about what is happening in their day to day lives. Like I said earlier I hope in 2020 they can find a reasonable candidate (and not the buffoon that is Donald Trump) to hear their voices because the status quo is not the answer.
 
Mine, too. The blind enthusiasm and hypocrisy on Twitter from Trumpites is overwhelming. Thousands of them were at FL rallies yesterday. I sincerely hope that pollsters have done their homework.

They can have all the enthusiasm in the world, as long as they aren't registered to vote it's meaningless.

No such surge in registration have been recorded.
 
final-melting3.jpg
 
Does hillbilly = deplorable? The reason Hillary took so much heat for that comment and also a big reason for the rise of Donald Trump is that although an awful lot of these folks hold untenable positions on many subjects they also do have legitimate concerns about what is happening in their day to day lives. Like I said earlier I hope in 2020 they can find a reasonable candidate (and not the buffoon that is Donald Trump) to hear their voices because the status quo is not the answer.

No it means very poor, uneducated people who are generally "indigenous" to that area of the country .
 
Mine, too. The blind enthusiasm and hypocrisy on Twitter from Trumpites is overwhelming. Thousands of them were at FL rallies yesterday. I sincerely hope that pollsters have done their homework.
The reason that journo knew to go to that county in West Virginia is because of publicly available information, and pollsters use all that data down to the sub-county level. And campaigns (well, one campaign at least) spends millions on doing it themselves to a far greater level of detail.
 
Does hillbilly = deplorable? The reason Hillary took so much heat for that comment and also a big reason for the rise of Donald Trump is that although an awful lot of these folks hold untenable positions on many subjects they also do have legitimate concerns about what is happening in their day to day lives. Like I said earlier I hope in 2020 they can find a reasonable candidate (and not the buffoon that is Donald Trump) to hear their voices because the status quo is not the answer.

For sure change is needed. Think most people agree on that.

But not the change that Trump promises. So failing that it would bebetter go go with the least worst option....
 
My fear is that people like these aren't reflected in the polls.


West Virginia 63% republican in 2012. Very much reflected in the polls I'd say. It's actually turning democrat in latest pills as peogle like this are wising up to trumps lies
 
For sure change is needed. Think most people agree on that.

But not the change that Trump promises. So failing that it would bebetter go go with the least worst option....
I agree. Trump must not be president.
 
No it means very poor, uneducated people who are generally "indigenous" to that area of the country .
It's still a putdown in the same vein as "redneck." Which is the word of the day that Bill is now taking heat on.
 
It's still a putdown in the same vein as "redneck." Which is the word of the day that Bill is now taking heat on.

Well yes its obviously an unflattering term, but it generally applies to a specific part of the country = the two states I mentioned. Its completely independent from deplorables or rednecks which could easily be applied more broadly.
 
Well yes its obviously an unflattering term, but it generally applies to a specific part of the country = the two states I mentioned. Its completely independent from deplorables or rednecks which could easily be applied more broadly.
You've never lived in the south have you? But ok, no big deal!
 
Does hillbilly = deplorable? The reason Hillary took so much heat for that comment and also a big reason for the rise of Donald Trump is that although an awful lot of these folks hold untenable positions on many subjects they also do have legitimate concerns about what is happening in their day to day lives. Like I said earlier I hope in 2020 they can find a reasonable candidate (and not the buffoon that is Donald Trump) to hear their voices because the status quo is not the answer.

Hopefully Rubio will be the nominee (He would have beaten Clinton convincingly in my view this November).

Problem is all those who voted Trump in the primaries sadly are not going anywhere, so my worry is if another outlandish figure manages to crop up for them to get behind.
 
Hopefully Rubio will be the nominee (He would have beaten Clinton convincingly in my view this November).

Problem is all these who voted Trump in the primaries sadly are not going anywhere so my worry is if another outlandish figure manages to crop up for these them to get behind.,

I think Rubio might have been damaged too much after all the insults Trump threw at him this time round. He was beaten convincingly and might struggle to recover.
 
Hopefully Rubio will be the nominee (He would have beaten Clinton convincingly in my view this November).

Problem is all those who voted Trump in the primaries sadly are not going anywhere, so my worry is if another outlandish figure manages to crop up for them to get behind.

Agreed. What we are seeing here is an ideological fracture that can't be sustained in the current Republican party - as there will always be a massive disparity in values between the 3 factions - Trump/Alt-Right/Angry White folks faction, the Cruz,Beck old school conservative orthodoxy, and the establishment/centric/Jeb Bush/Rubio et al side of the house. If the Republican party stays divided as it currently is, then the Dems retain the Presidency for a long time (especially with the demographics unfolding as they are, where Dems start the campaigns with an EC edge). The only rational thing to happen is for a new Conservative Party to arise that can accommodate the Trump/Alt-Right/Tea Party nuts, who can then run their campaigns as they please, while the establishment types can stay in the GOP and continue as before.
 
@Raoul Little Marco is no centrist. He appears polished and reasonable but he's the same type of Koch-sucking Tea Partiers/talk radio made/evangelical Republican. Erick Erickson and his evangelicals+ the Cuban GOP machinery in Florida manufactured him from a no name into national spotlight.

The prevailing myth is that he's the GOP's Barry but it's plain false. Presidential politics now is reality-TV lite so he may win by coasting on style rather than substance but he'd get crushed discussing policies.
 

Brilliant, in that case I'll bow out to your superior longevity and return to discussing Presidential politics.
No big deal. I'm sorry it's just when you referred to the folks in that video as "fortunately they more or less only exist in states Trump will win any way" it touched a bit of a nerve and I overreacted. I feel sorry for folks like that. My wife is from an area in Alabama like that. These folks for the longest time have had not a voice and they've been suckered in by the huckster who is Donald Trump. For all their faults and prejudices they feel they have nowhere to turn and then they get taken in by a two-bit shyster. Believe me I want Donald Trump to lose but I also want people like those folks to have a voice for change.
 
@Raoul Little Marco is no centrist. He appears polished and reasonable but he's the same type of Koch-sucking Tea Partiers/talk radio made/evangelical Republican. Erick Erickson and his evangelicals+ the Cuban GOP machinery in Florida manufactured him from a no name into national spotlight.

The prevailing myth is that he's the GOP's Barry but it's plain false. Presidential politics now is reality-TV lite so he may win by coasting on style rather than substance but he'd get crushed discussing policies.

Not really. He rode to power on the Tea Party wave but has since fallen off the wagon. He 's far too flexible on immigration to ever be accepted by them again, which is why Cruz hammered him repeatedly for the gang of 8 during the primaries. His only path to victory going forward is to run somewhere between the Cruz and establishment wings. That said, the only way any GOP candidate of that ilk will be successful will be if a new party is formed that separates the Trump factions from the traditional GOP.
 
@Raoul Little Marco is no centrist. He appears polished and reasonable but he's the same type of Koch-sucking Tea Partiers/talk radio made/evangelical Republican. Erick Erickson and his evangelicals+ the Cuban GOP machinery in Florida manufactured him from a no name into national spotlight.

The prevailing myth is that he's the GOP's Barry but it's plain false. Presidential politics now is reality-TV lite so he may win by coasting on style rather than substance but he'd get crushed discussing policies.

Not really. He rode to power on the Tea Party wave but has since fallen off the wagon. He 's far too flexible on immigration to ever be accepted by them again, which is why Cruz hammered him repeatedly for the gang of 8 during the primaries. His only path to victory going forward is to run somewhere between the Cruz and establishment wings. That said, the only way any GOP candidate of that ilk will be successful will be if a new party is formed that separates the Trump factions from the traditional GOP.
 
Not really. He rode to power on the Tea Party wave but has since fallen off the wagon. He 's far too flexible on immigration to ever be accepted by them again, which is why Cruz hammered him repeatedly for the gang of 8 during the primaries. His only path to victory going forward is to run somewhere between the Cruz and establishment wings. That said, the only way any GOP candidate of that ilk will be successful will be if a new party is formed that separates the Trump factions from the traditional GOP.

The point is he is exactly the kind of subversive politicians the Koch brothers put into office by channeling populism like the Tea Party movement. Let's check his actual policies:
  • Women's health and reproductive rights: regressive. Defund PP. Abstinence education. Repeal Roe v. Wade
  • Supply side trickle down economics.
  • Military expansion. Increasing the size of US navy.
  • Hawkish foreign policy
  • Cutting welfare, privatizing social security
  • Keep Gitmo, for NSA government surveillance.
  • Anti Muslim policies

The only part where he differs from the like of Lyin' Ted is immigration reform, but it's no secret that orthodox Republicans have long favored immigration as a means of boosting productivity. And he promptly backed out of the deal once it's apparent it'd make him toxic with the GOP primary base.

He's a younger, more polished, more likeable Mike Pence.
 
The point is he is exactly the kind of subversive politicians the Koch brothers put into office by channeling populism like the Tea Party movement. Let's check his actual policies:
  • Women's health and reproductive rights: regressive. Defund PP. Abstinence education. Repeal Roe v. Wade
  • Supply side trickle down economics.
  • Military expansion. Increasing the size of US navy.
  • Hawkish foreign policy
  • Cutting welfare, privatizing social security
  • Keep Gitmo, for NSA government surveillance.
  • Anti Muslim policies

The only part where he differs from the like of Lyin' Ted is immigration reform, but it's no secret that orthodox Republicans have long favored immigration as a means of boosting productivity. And he promptly backed out of the deal once it's apparent it'd make him toxic with the GOP primary base.

He's a younger, more polished, more likeable Mike Pence.

Most of those are establishment GOP policies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.