Doesn't Laos have more unexploded bombs and landmines than anywhere else in the world? Oh, it can't have, because there was never a war in Laos was there?
Well said.*Trump takedown*
Absolutely. I believed for a long time that the public would, one day, warm to Ed Miliband. Christ.This is what I've been saying for a while now, the Bernie's camp is stoking the anger and remove themselves from the mainstream Dems. 20 pages back RD was saying it's imperative there's a Dem in the White House and now apparently he'll consider voting for Trump over 'Shillary'.
We like to denigrate the right but the left can be just as silly. Emotions and politics just don't mix. But hey ho, it's your vote, as long as you can live with the consequences.
Doesn't Laos have more unexploded bombs and landmines than anywhere else in the world? Oh, it can't have, because there was never a war in Laos was there?
I was at the Quang Tri Province in the summer of 2010. 40 years after the siege there in 1972, there are families whose income comes from finding unexploded bombs, removing the explosives manually and selling the metal. Needless to say more than a few have lost their limbs or lives from that banned practice. That's Kissinger's legacy, and apparently it's all fine and dandy because that was all 'a choice between evils'.
Well Scalia just died. Obama gets to make another Supreme Court pick.
Whoa. Massive.Well Scalia just died. Obama gets to make another Supreme Court pick.
How long does it take to appoint another one? Like, can the republicans block Obama in the hope that they'll get a republican in the white house?
To think, we were begging 2016 to put scythe down.
Doesn't it have to go through the senate? Holy shit, this is huge.
How long does it take to appoint another one? Like, can the republicans block Obama in the hope that they'll get a republican in the white house?
To think, we were begging 2016 to put scythe down.
This will change the Presidential race, should be interesting to hear Cruz and Rubio pontificate tonight
Yes, and they will try to stall until after the election
Scalia - ultra conservative member of the Supreme Court. They only tend to get replaced when they die. Him going means there's now a chance to make it a majority liberal.Can someone explain to me why this is of such significance?
Basically, the president gets to appoint someone with similar views to them to the supreme court, and the supreme court gets the final say on what is or isn't constitutional - Scalia for example happens to see the constitution as a far right manual.Can someone explain to me why this is of such significance?
They might like how that ends even less if Bernie gets in!
I daresay Scalia is right now.The Supreme Court is obviously not immune from feeling the Bern.![]()
Well Scalia just died. Obama gets to make another Supreme Court pick.
Basically, the president gets to appoint someone with similar views to them to the supreme court, and the supreme court gets the final say on what is or isn't constitutional - Scalia for example happens to see the constitution as a far right manual.
CNN saying this fella is the leading contender to replace Scalia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Srinivasan
Yes, and they will try to stall until after the election
So he could serve for the next 25 years!!!Yep, under 50...probably the youngest since Clarence Thomas in the early 90s
CNN saying this fella is the leading contender to replace Scalia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Srinivasan
Well Scalia just died. Obama gets to make another Supreme Court pick.
So for example a liberal would overturn the gun laws? Is that what you mean?
Some gun laws I guess, they wouldn't be able to ban guns altogether.So for example a liberal would overturn the gun laws? Is that what you mean?
Obama is not going to get his nominee...they'll block and stall any and every attemptCame to the Caf to comment on this. RIP, but talk about perfect timing.
The Republicans are delusional if they think Obama will leave without placing a replacement in the Court. Best they can do is make sure the judge isnt too leftist.
The court cannot overturn a constitutional amendment. That is up to Congress and 38 state legislatures. So the answer to your question is no