İlkay Gündoğan

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree, we shouldn't buy anyone who has ever had an injury. Hurt you're back? You're out. Pulled a hamstring? You're out? Had a cold? You're out. Premature ejactulator? You're out.

Because a broken back or broken knees are obviously the same thing as the other 'injuries'. Even ignoring the fact he wouldn't be anything more than a bench warmer right now.

Wait for one more year to see if he's anywhere near good enough. The signing of Falcao should have taught us that much at least.
 
Dortmund will replace him with Johannes Geis and get the better player for cheaper. I do wonder what are scouts are doing half the time.

Give the club a ring, you're obviously the man for the job.
 
@Sphaero How has he been this season?

Based on his potential and top form he is clearly underperforming this season, which is understandable after his very long injury. He has yet to rediscover his complete edge in terms of tackling and a lot of his pressing resistance. His passing (especially his range) and close control are still there, though. He had his best games alongside Sahin, who relieved him of some of his former tasks and covered him defensively.

The BILD story is not more reliable as the one in the DailyMail, because it cites the latter as source.

However, sources close to Dortmund state that he will be sold this Summer if he does not renew his contract soon. The officials have appearantly made a final offer, which would make him the second best payed player after Reus. If that is not enough for Gündogan, I see United as one of the most likeliest destinations. If he manages to recapture his form prior to the back injury, he would be an upgrade for Herrera and a steal. If he stays at his current level, he would be at least a solid back up option for the Spaniard for a sum, which does not really hurt them.
 
His contract lasts until 2016, no? If so, he'd be pretty cheap you imagine. I'd bite everybody's hands off prior to his injury, he was such a majestic and fun to watch player but I'm a bit worried about his recapturing his pre-injury form. But hey, if he'd cost peanuts I'd take a punt at him.
 
Because a broken back or broken knees are obviously the same thing as the other 'injuries'. Even ignoring the fact he wouldn't be anything more than a bench warmer right now.

Wait for one more year to see if he's anywhere near good enough. The signing of Falcao should have taught us that much at least.
And shouldn't Shearer, RVN, Pires, Arteta, Baggio, Del Piero et al not teach us that writing off players who have had serious injuries is a bit naive? Even just watching that limited video posted earlier shows he hasn't lost that dreaded yard of pace, he most definitely hasn't lost his vision, he hasn't lost his hunger, aggression either. For £15mil it's a no brainer.
 
What's the point? He wouldn't be more than a backup to Herrera and he isn't defensively good enough to replace Carrick if that's what we are planning.
For 15m the rewards far outweigh the risks imo.
 
Dortmund's desire to offer a substantial new contract would alleviate some of the concerns regarding his condition post-injury. Definitely worth a punt at the figures being quoted.
 
It was suspicious that he just signed a 2 year contract last year. I dont think he will sign an extension, he wants a move. So could be that BVB are tempted to sell him now. Next year he will go for free.
 
For £15m you buy Gundogan. Would work fine in a 4-3-3 instead of Fellaini. Aggression, good engine, great vision.
 
It was suspicious that he just signed a 2 year contract last year. I dont think he will sign an extension, he wants a move. So could be that BVB are tempted to sell him now. Next year he will go for free.

Think it was for two reasons. One was BVB being nice guys helping him when he struggled with his horrible back injury and was a nice gesture to show that they're with him, second one is that Barcelona was reportedly circling around him trying to get him so BVB tried to make sure that Barca will have to pay more for him (or they simply removed release clause from his previous contract, if there was one).
 
Did he recover from his back condition which almost destroyed his career last year?
 
Did he recover from his back condition which almost destroyed his career last year?
Surgery. "a minimal invasive procedure at the lumbar spine without complications".
 
Apparently he's one of the reasons why Dortmund's form has picked up. Might be worth taking a punt on him rather than Strootman or paying silly money for Pogba knowing that Raiola will be offering him to Real Madrid, PSG etc two or three years down the line so he gets his nice big fat agent fee.
 
Dortmund don't sell 2 big names in one window. Simple as that imo.


I don't know this is a big summer for Dortmund they're coming off a terrible season and have no Champions League money to rely on next year, Gundogan has one year on his contract they might decide to cash in while a £33m offer for Hummels after a mediocre season suddenly looks great.

The £50m for those 2 players will probably go along way to improving their squad, no doubt Klopp will want to make changes.
 
Based on his potential and top form he is clearly underperforming this season, which is understandable after his very long injury. He has yet to rediscover his complete edge in terms of tackling and a lot of his pressing resistance. His passing (especially his range) and close control are still there, though. He had his best games alongside Sahin, who relieved him of some of his former tasks and covered him defensively.

The BILD story is not more reliable as the one in the DailyMail, because it cites the latter as source.

However, sources close to Dortmund state that he will be sold this Summer if he does not renew his contract soon. The officials have appearantly made a final offer, which would make him the second best payed player after Reus. If that is not enough for Gündogan, I see United as one of the most likeliest destinations. If he manages to recapture his form prior to the back injury, he would be an upgrade for Herrera and a steal. If he stays at his current level, he would be at least a solid back up option for the Spaniard for a sum, which does not really hurt them.

Cheers. Good to know his offensive game is close to his best. The defensive bit will come with game time, has been out for a while.

For 15mil, I'd take him in a hearbeat. The part in bold is absolutely spot on. There is no way we can get a better player for 15mil.
 
Because a broken back or broken knees are obviously the same thing as the other 'injuries'. Even ignoring the fact he wouldn't be anything more than a bench warmer right now.

Wait for one more year to see if he's anywhere near good enough. The signing of Falcao should have taught us that much at least.

Since he's been back, he's missed just 1 game due to injury and been on the bench twice when fit. He has started every other game. There's still more time on our hands to see how he fares till the end of season.

If he stays fit, I dont see any reason to not take him for 15mil. Even if he doesnt get back to his best, we won't get a better squad player for that much money.
 
Since he's been back, he's missed just 1 game due to injury and been on the bench twice when fit. He has started every other game. There's still more time on our hands to see how he fares till the end of season.

If he stays fit, I dont see any reason to not take him for 15mil. Even if he doesnt get back to his best, we won't get a better squad player for that much money.

I agree. You still have him on SM, right?
 
If he manages to recapture his form prior to the back injury, he would be an upgrade for Herrera and a steal. If he stays at his current level, he would be at least a solid back up option for the Spaniard for a sum, which does not really hurt them.

Yep, sums it up nicely. I'm far from convinced he'll return to his pre-injury level because it really does look like dynamism and tenacity has disappeared following the injury, but at the very least he'd be a great rotation player who offers something different for a very reasonable fee. Would be a shame to see him leave Dortmund without getting back to his top level and getting them a decent fee though, considering the amount of time they invested in developing and nurturing him.
 
Yep. What a transfer war that was. 39.6 mil vs 39 mil. IS it still the transfer record for the league or has someone gone for more?

Still the record for pure cash, though I can blow it out of the water if anyone would accept cash these days.

Gundogan (Leicester > Arsenal) - £39.6M
Ronaldo (United > Spurs) - £36M
Sneijder (United > Chelsea) - £35M
Dzeko (Brighton > Liverpool) - £33.6M
Puyol (Fulham > Barcelona) - £33.4M
Falcao (Stoke > Newcastle) - £33M

Top six transfers, not a great record for those players post-transfer really, Ronaldo aside.
 
For £15m it would be worth the punt. He could take Fellaini's place or could even play in Carrick's position.
 
Still the record for pure cash, though I can blow it out of the water if anyone would accept cash these days.

Gundogan (Leicester > Arsenal) - £39.6M
Ronaldo (United > Spurs) - £36M
Sneijder (United > Chelsea) - £35M
Dzeko (Brighton > Liverpool) - £33.6M
Puyol (Fulham > Barcelona) - £33.4M
Falcao (Stoke > Newcastle) - £33M

Top six transfers, not a great record for those players post-transfer really, Ronaldo aside.

Dzeko for 33.6mil. Jesus..

Its pretty much impossible to deal in cash nowadays. No one wants it.
 
He was the midfielder I wanted before the back injuries began to occur, haven't seen much of him since his return, only that he was carrying extra weight.
 
Last edited:
£50million for both Gundogan and Hummels would be the best piece of transfer business Woodward has ever done imo(Which isn't saying a lot btw) Both have performed and shown they are capable of performing at a world class level, and both players would instantly inject quality into the starting 11. If Dortmund miss out on the CL, then maybe we can get these deals done?
 
£50million for both Gundogan and Hummels would be the best piece of transfer business Woodward has ever done imo(Which isn't saying a lot btw) Both have performed and shown they are capable of performing at a world class level, and both players would instantly inject quality into the starting 11. If Dortmund miss out on the CL, then maybe we can get these deals done?

£50m for an injury plagued, error prone CB and a midfielder recuperating from a bad back injury? Woody can do a lot better and did do better last season.
 
For £15m it would be worth the punt. He could take Fellaini's place or could even play in Carrick's position.

Unfortunately I suspect it would be Ander that he competes with, due to Fellaini's physical properties

If LVG wanted to use 2 small technical players we've had Ander and Mata wanting to play in the same team all season, and we've only just worked out a way for them with Mata on the right

If we signed a CM with physicality themselves it would be different. They could share games and compete with Fellaini. But another player similar to Ander is likely to compete with him
 
I've only seen Gundogan play maybe twice, so for those who've seen much more of him, which player is he similar to regrading attributes, ability etc?
 
If he does manage to regain his old form he's probably in the very top bracket of midfielders. Like up with Modric, Verratti etc
 
I've only seen Gundogan play maybe twice, so for those who've seen much more of him, which player is he similar to regrading attributes, ability etc?

He (was?) similar to Ander but maybe a bit better at controlling matches with his passing and takes players on with dribbling more often

Ander has thus far scored as many goals this season (5) as Gundogan has managed in any of his and Ander has started just over a third of our matches. So the goalthreat must go to Ander.

They both do their fair share of ball winning. I dont think either are quite as creative as the most creative AMs like Fabregas or Silva.

I think I've seen him play a full match once this season so no idea if he's as good at these things now.
 
Gundogan is miles better than Mata in midfield, he's a proper CM with combative qualities and a proper defensive game.
 
He (was?) similar to Ander but maybe a bit better at controlling matches with his passing and takes players on with dribbling more often

Ander has thus far scored as many goals this season (5) as Gundogan has managed in any of his and Ander has started just over a third of our matches. So the goalthreat must go to Ander.

They both do their fair share of ball winning. I dont think either are quite as creative as the most creative AMs like Fabregas or Silva.

I think I've seen him play a full match once this season so no idea if he's as good at these things now.
Cheers.
 
Gundogan is miles better than Mata in midfield, he's a proper CM with combative qualities and a proper defensive game.
Strange comparison. Mata is an AM, Gundogan is a CM. Compare him to Herrera or Carrick if you want to.
 
He (was?) similar to Ander but maybe a bit better at controlling matches with his passing and takes players on with dribbling more often

Ander has thus far scored as many goals this season (5) as Gundogan has managed in any of his and Ander has started just over a third of our matches. So the goalthreat must go to Ander.

They both do their fair share of ball winning. I dont think either are quite as creative as the most creative AMs like Fabregas or Silva.

I think I've seen him play a full match once this season so no idea if he's as good at these things now.

Gundogan is miles better than Mata in midfield, he's a proper CM with combative qualities and a proper defensive game.
Also, is it fair to say he is a midfielder who can thrive in the possession game you'll be playing?
 
Strange comparison. Mata is an AM, Gundogan is a CM. Compare him to Herrera or Carrick if you want to.

It was in response to Ekeke suggesting that if LvG were willing to play with two technical CM's then we'd have used Herrera ad Mata this season. Also Gundogan is not small, not sure why people think that.
 
He was amazing pre injury. If I had to choose any young central midfielder at the time, it would have been gundogan. Technically brilliant, capable defensively and could absolutely run the game.
 
Also, is it fair to say he is a midfielder who can thrive in the possession game you'll be playing?

Probably as comfortable as a non-Spanish midfielder who isnt Pirlo is going to be yeah. At his best he would stylistically have been the type of player who could play for your Barcelona - but then again I'd say the same about Fabregas and some people felt differently
 
Status
Not open for further replies.