Mali_Zeus
New Member
Yeah, really rich.That's rich.
They are not even the biggest club in France historically.
Yeah, really rich.That's rich.
Yeah, really rich.
They are not even the biggest club in France historically.
The accounts department where I work print in this font so it must be accurate.
Yeah, really rich.
They are not even the biggest club in France historically.
PSG is the most plastic club imaginable. Owned by Qatar and created in 1970 when "..an ambitious group of businessmen decided to create a major club in the French capital. They chose to merge their virtual side, Paris FC, with Stade Saint-Germain." (from wiki)
A world class player needs to show a little more than good form in one season. The fact that he failed so miserably last season seems to have been completely dismissed by you. In assessing "world class" you need to take all performances into account, not just ones that suit.
He's demonstrably not world class.
They're a big club cause of all the money they have now or have been regarded a big club before that?They are a lot younger than Marseille or Saint Etienne but they are a big club.
We just get the £750m from Adidas over 10 years or whatever don't we? I say "just" - that's a massive amount but I don't think we get the shirt sales money - that goes to Adidas of course.I thought we didn't make anything of kit sales and that's the point of the massive sponsorships? Also heard if we make anything it's as little as 5%.
They're a big club cause of all the money they have now or have been regarded a big club before that?
That doesn't equal bigger than United or step up for every player bar Barca and madrid
How do you think clubs are created, how do you think United have been created?
Even if it is, it's ridiculous and deserves scorn no matter what his intentions wereHe is advertising, you don't expect him to say "Sign for us, because we are big but not that big"
This may sound stupid but based on what?They were a big club before the Qatari, they had financial problems in the 2000s though.
They pretty much always had a wealthy owner though, like Canal+.
Lolz.. And now we go into denial mode and start talking as if PSG don't exist. They completed their quadruple. Became Ligue 1 winners for the 3rd straight time. Knocked the best English team out of UCL. And hence are a big name currently in the world. They have a talented squad as well.
Talking about history to make ourselves feel happy is a scouser job.
This may sound stupid but based on what?
They werent big in regards of trophies before the takeover.
Tradition, fans, Paris?
Fans I guess and emblematic players. It's a bit weird because it's like ASM Clermont Auvergne in Rugby they haven't won a lot, but they are an emblematic club.
Usually not by merging established clubs. Imagine being fan of your local team who your grandfather supported and then seeing it being "merged" with another rival team.
There are other clubs "created" like this, FC Copenhagen (established/merged 1992) for one, round my neck of the woods there was talks of doing the same with three teams in Gothenburg some years back but the fans protested against the ideas of that particular set of "ambitious businessmen" so it never happened. There are probably a lot of other examples I don't know of, but to me these kind of artificial "super clubs" are about as plastic as you can get.
Fair enough if you say that Paris FC club was basically a new creation by the same guys but Stade-Saint Germain was founded in 1904. At a push you could say the situation is a bit different to the ones above as there wasn't any real rivalry, but a club like City is Egypt in terms of history compared to the 45 years of PSG.
Then you add the Qatar regime into the equation and you get a very charmless club..
They are preparing for life without Gaz, they want people to come to Qatar, also they are building a new training center in Paris, the players might not travel to Doha when it's finished.
Gaz?
Fair enough if they are building a facility in France, but you would have thought there was already a few top medical facilities in france they could use already.
You are missing the point, they are in it for advertising their country.
The club is just Stade saint-Germain, the name changed and that's about it, the club trains and plays in the same place. It's not much different from Newton Heath becoming Manchester United.
Fair enough, you'll know more about them than I do. But the Stade Saint Germain records aren't considered a part of their history from what I can tell.
I will still consider them satan's creation if you don't mind
In the absence of other evidence, I'm taking this as a fact.
Ryan Giggs has won more than PSG.
Ryan Giggs has won more than PSG.
Can't believe i bought his shirt last season.
Who?If he really tried to unsettle Rojo to get him to leave then at least he did something good for you.
as many CL's as PSG had titles rior to the buy out. and my family lives in france and laughs at PSG. yes many are older than 20 or 30 yrs old and know that PSG was nothing prior. they are more like MK dons with money.