Talking Vulture
He's shit, move on.
Fantastic signing for Arsenal. Disappointing we couldn't sign him.
Well we could if we offered them the right money.
Fantastic signing for Arsenal. Disappointing we couldn't sign him.
Fergie in public balked at the actual fee for Hazard as well as his wages. The agents fee was the icing on the cake.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7926082/
And in the hindsight £34m was exactly what Hazard was worth. Fergie was a bit out of sync with the market in the final years of his spell at United to be truthful and Moyes is continuing this.
But seriously, is Ozil to Arsenal done, or is there still a chance that we may move for him?
He didn't have much trouble with deals around £20m, it was whenever we approached the magical £30m he seemed rather unwilling to deal. Perhaps it was Veron fiasco that turned his mind on this, £28m for him in 2001 was massive money.Agreed though he wasn't afraid to pay £24 million for RvP. It was mainly the foreign market we were unwilling to spend big money.
Credit to Wenger. Putting the money where his mouth is. It'l be fantastic to see Ozil in the prem.
Because he'd be replacing him in the line-up?
Kagawa doesn't even play for us, Nani is a winger and Rooney wants out. Giggs could quite conceivably be our only attacking midfielder in a year.
He didn't have much trouble with deals around £20m, it was whenever we approached the magical £30m he seemed rather unwilling to deal. Perhaps it was Veron fiasco that turned his mind on this, £28m for him in 2001 was massive money.
Credit to Wenger. Putting the money where his mouth is. It'l be fantastic to see Ozil in the prem.
Ozil after completing the transfer: 0_0
Why? He'd be allowed to spend £17m plus high wages on Young and £16m on Jones but not £35m on Hazard? I think Fergie had as much money available to him as he wished for, we were capable of spending £35m on a player.Or maybe he wasn't allowed to errr you know spend that much.
Done. Having his medical in Germany and has agreed a 7m/year wage package.
And in the hindsight £34m was exactly what Hazard was worth. Fergie was a bit out of sync with the market in the final years of his spell at United to be truthful and Moyes is continuing this.
Why? He'd be allowed to spend £17m plus high wages on Young and £16m on Jones but not £35m on Hazard? I think Fergie had as much money available to him as he wished for, we were capable of spending £35m on a player.
Or maybe he wasn't allowed to errr you know spend that much.
Don't see how Kagawa's not fitting in here but we should go in for Ozil.
What about the ridiculous fee for the agent?
Wonder what Wilshere will make of this? Not sure he'll be pleased about playing a deeper role. Definitely less effective.
£6m is feck all in a great scheme of things, he'd have cost us £40m in total and he was well worth it - a 21-year old who is going to be one of the best in the world for a decade or so. The whole reluctancy to pay premium money to agents etc. has hindered us a bit in the market, it's one thing having principles and another implementing them within reason.What about the ridiculous fee for the agent?
Check closely and you find they aren't that similar.
What's not similar about them? Both creative, both very good, both run out of gas after 60-70 mins. Yes Ozil is better but I don't see where he's fitting in.