I think there was an element of this under SAF as well but not to the same extent you see with Mourinho. For SAF it was more a case of acknowledging when an opponent deserved that kind of respect - when you were facing off against a particularly good team. But this kind of pragmatism is right at the centre of what I guess Van Gaal would call Mourinho's football philosophy, he will adapt for anyone, not just the teams he doesnt feel confident going toe-to-toe with.
That's my impression anyway.
Yes the Mourinho part I understand, that's his philosophy, always has and always will be.I think there was an element of this under SAF as well but not to the same extent you see with Mourinho. For SAF it was more a case of acknowledging when an opponent deserved that kind of respect - when you were facing off against a particularly good team. But this kind of pragmatism is right at the centre of what I guess Van Gaal would call Mourinho's football philosophy, he will adapt for anyone, not just the teams he doesnt feel confident going toe-to-toe with.
That's my impression anyway.
I long for the days when we would go into these games with the opposition worrying about having to adapt their games to deal with us!
I think fans take a lead from the manager to a certain extent. Fans opine on what they think we should do, but often in the context of what they expect their manager to do, or at least to consider doing. So I would again refer back to the SAF comparison. I think under him, fans wouldnt think about adapting to the lowlier teams in the PL as it wasnt something they had seen SAF do, it wasnt part of their mindset. If we played Madrid or Barca or even Chelsea or Arsenal we might propose the man marking thing, or a change of shape, because we knew it was something SAF might do. We were all second guessing him as much as saying what we thought should happen. And now there is a lot more of it because we see our manager adapts in just about every game, we know that is what he is likely to do so people suggest what form it should take.Yes the Mourinho part I understand, that's his philosophy, always has and always will be.
My question is directed to the fans, it seems like we are buying into the way Mourinho approaches a game, we are pragmatic as well. Every big game we worry first about how we will stop the opponents, was it always the case or is it something we are adopting because Jose is our manager now?
Great post, that explains it quite well. Thank youI think fans take a lead from the manager to a certain extent. Fans opine on what they think we should do, but often in the context of what they expect their manager to do, or at least to consider doing. So I would again refer back to the SAF comparison. I think under him, fans wouldnt think about adapting to the lowlier teams in the PL as it wasnt something they had seen SAF do, it wasnt part of their mindset. If we played Madrid or Barca or even Chelsea or Arsenal we might propose the man marking thing, or a change of shape, because we knew it was something SAF might do. We were all second guessing him as much as saying what we thought should happen. And now there is a lot more of it because we see our manager adapts in just about every game, we know that is what he is likely to do so people suggest what form it should take.
I guess if we had a manager like Guardiola who was less likely to adapt the strategy for specific opposition people would be less inclined to suggest such changes and speculation would be centred on things like squad selection instead.
Agreed, I like that analysis very much and I could see Martial doing a similar job to Rashford in that formation.
I'm struck by how Van Gaal's 5-3-2 put us all to sleep because the front players were incapable of breaking quickly. This has been solved by Jose's personnel and I very much look forward to seeing it in action (if Lukaku doesn't get beasted by Bobby Mart and miss the game ).
Haven't dreaded a game like this for a while. We've looked very ordinary since the Arsenal game and you on the other hand are in brilliant form. Can't decide how I'd like to set up either.
It could be:
-----------Firmino---------
Mane----Coutinho---.Salah
---Henderson-Wijnaldum--
...which looks good on paper, but leaves our abysmal defence quite exposed.
or:
Coutinho---Firmino---Mane
Wijnaldum--Henderson--Can
..which I'd probably go with, and then bring on Salah as an impact sub when the inevitable high tempo game has made an impact on your players. Either way, you are big favorites imo. You can go on about how this is "Liverpools cup final" and all, but it's rather important to you as well. Not just to keep up with City, but also for you fans, as you already have 8 pages of pre match chat 11 days before it kicks off
It's definitely a big game for both sides and for both fan bases. I'll take the favourites tag but it doesn't sit well with me on a trip to Anfield, which joking aside is always a daunting prospect for United fans.
On the point about your exposed back four I don't know how you'd go about addressing it without Keita. I think Can can be very good at times but I'm not keen on Wijnaldum and Henderson.
You mean the games they played us off the park and we snatched 1-0 wins. We could have easily lost those games. If that was making them worry about us it was a very risky game to play.I long for the days when we would go into these games with the opposition worrying about having to adapt their games to deal with us!
Just to add to that, in addition to the manager, Mourinho has built a squad with players having specific qualities to take advantages of each opponent differently. A lot of the first XI selection then comes down to the strengths and weaknesses of our opponents and which players are best suited to that.
It's very interesting when it's put like that, because compared to other teams our team looks very diverse. We have players that suit possession football, counter attack, crossing... any philosophy you can think of. The only team that comes close to us is Chelsea and it's not a suprise since Jose was their manager.
I also feel that it's one of the reason why it's difficult to see our game plan especially for fans of our rivals. They look at our team and they can't tell which philosophy our team fits. When you look at city and liverpool you can tell how they are going to set up, so it's easier to say they are more of a threat or they have better players, because all of them fit into that system.
Looking at our team the whole team is rock solid, there's no weakness because every player fits into a particular system we want to adopt because Jose isn't limited to one philosophy like other managers.
I don't remember who said this, but the person said that you never know which Jose team is going to show up, imagine being an opposition manager having to prepare to play United, where do you even start? If you are lucky to figure out how we will play then we can simply change during half time and play differently and catch you off guard. That in itself is our main strength and the reason why Jose is very successful and will never be found out.
For interest sake, how can Liverpool neutralise us? How can United be stopped?
By scoring as many goals as United or more?
How did Stoke stop United? As bad as Liverpool look now, they are way more potent in attack than Stoke. If they score first, they may be happy to press us only in their half and counter with some of the paciest forwards in the league. Jose won't underestimate them, all the more because Pogba will probably miss the game.
For those who say we can't start Young at LB as he's not good defensively, he started during that 0-0 at Anfield last season and against Chelsea at OT, when he had defensive duties as well. And in both games his defensive work was quite good.
Quite unfortunate that Sturridge had a stinker, I am sure Klopp will start Firmino against us, and whenever he plays, he links up well with Mane and Salah and is key to them scoring as well. Sturridge would not be a great threat in comparison.
Play a midfield of Matic, Herrera and Pogba. I'd prefer the team to be a bit more defensive than the gung-ho approach we take at home. Ideally, something similar to that Chelsea game at OT, where we played a definite, defensive game but were also efficient in attack. The perfect balance.
I long for the days when we would go into these games with the opposition worrying about having to adapt their games to deal with us!
Spot on, IMO. Sturridge is a good finisher but he doesn't offer the same threat as Firmino who has a much better understanding with the other forwards and works harder to boot.
You think Pogba will be ready?
To be fair sacrificing one of your players to man-mark Bale at Spurs (Jones), Alonso at Madrid (Welbeck iirc), Pirlo (Park) and I think Ronaldo by Jones again is as pragmatic and adaptive to the opponents as it can be. We've done that before and, being pragmatic person myself, it's the right approach imo.
I 100% expect Fellaini to start and use him and Lukaku as two target men to avoid Liverpool's pressing, we won't go all out attack either.
A while ago I would've argued ours is, but yours is far more clinical at the moment.Firminho + Salah + Mane + Coutinho + Sturridge VS Lukaku + Rashford + Martial + Miki + Mata
Which front-line is more deadly?
A while ago I would've argued ours is, but yours is far more clinical at the moment.
Your pressing that is below par will be in top form. I can guarantee it.You're all overstating our pressing ability. The stats show that we've dropped off in terms of pressing the opposition this season (likely a result of the extra European games).
A while ago I would've argued ours is, but yours is far more clinical at the moment.
What worries me is if Moreno bombs forward and leaves space in behind. When Lovren gets pulled into that wide area to cover, he struggles more than he normally does.Completely agree! Lukaku will have a field day against Lovren and Moreno unfortunately. And I do not think Sturridge will be part of our front.
Martin Atkinson