Wednesday at Stoke
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 22,241
- Supports
- Time Travel
That brick house of a lad rolls over from Kobbie’s arm and this is a free kick.
Yeah, but he hit Zirkzee who was offside.True but Garnacho would have scored anyway.
He was stretching to score as the ball passed him and went to Garnacho. He can't stop time and space after his lunge!
Ask yourself what the rule is for instead of looking at it in such a binary waythere is no rule about an unfair advantage though, if you touch the ball and you're offside it's offside
the unfair advantage stuff only comes into play if a player is deemed to have been interfering if they didn't touch the ball
Very oddBruno off is mental
He was trying to score off Bruno’s cross…it's zirkzee's fault for putting his body ahead of Garnacho - there's no defender there it makes no sense to charge forward..
Some posters are just waiting for any opportunity to hurl abuse at the team or whichever player they have an irrational dislike for.Christ. Striker going for the ball, on a wet field got in the way of the ball by accident.
Grow up.
Most biased ref performance I’ve seen in a long time
Poor finish, he had the whole goal to himself, but played it across and it appears the ball might not end in goalWhat the feck did Garnacho do wrong
Unfortunately defenders are judged based on their mistakes.good all game really other than the goal.
At another look, it would have been difficult for him to avoid indeed.He was sliding after trying to get his foot on the cross.
Blaming him for physics is absurd
Craig Pawson