kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Just for this extra rare scenario ? I hope you're jokingOffside rule should change. If the goal was going to go in anyway without a doubt, it should be given
Just for this extra rare scenario ? I hope you're jokingOffside rule should change. If the goal was going to go in anyway without a doubt, it should be given
Garnacho has been struggling with easy chances this season. This one anywhere else and no problemIf anyone is to blame is Garnacho who had time to make sure he wasn’t kicking it at an offside player. But that’s incredibly, incredibly harsh and he just isn’t to blame. A total freak. Fuming.
He wasn’t wearing a red jerseyWhere was that yellow for Brighton handball you ref cnut?
We’ve definitely got some of the dumbest postersWe’re probably the dumbest team in the league.
True but Garnacho would have scored anyway.
10 goals last season?Why McT???
good all game really other than the goal.
Kick it across the goal rather than easily putting it into the left side that he was already on.What the feck did Garnacho do wrong
Because the offside occurs before the ball crosses the line.
He had already lunged. That’s what CFs are supposed to do.it's zirkzee's fault for putting his body ahead of Garnacho - there's no defender there it makes no sense to charge forward..
If the ball is already crossing the line, then how does the offside make sense? Stupid rule.
I mean Garnacho should bury it rather than hit it straight at Zirkzee. Not really sure what Zirkzee's meant to do, he's slid to try and get it. Bruno overplayed the cross too
Craig Pawson