I mean, consider it like this. The establishment, by which I mean wealth concentration, has two options. One says end to tax-breaks for the establishment inasmuch as it has been for a prolonged period. An end to top-down economics (the ones who argue against it, ala Truss in the UK, are kicked out). So the "establishment" itself, and you can read Davos reports regarding equity in capital, understands that its model of extreme austerity and top-down economics does not even work for the richest because it feeds a fire of discontent among not just the poorest but the "middle", too.
Trump will win the election, I think, but the question is economic. What does the Trump administration do differently than the Biden administration? More tax-cuts? That is a stock-market downer (almost paradoxical considering such tax-cuts inflate the market, but not when you have a constant variable which states "top-down economic moves are anti-new-market-modality").
The "deep-state" is just the establishment and that you can easily discern by examining wealth via portfolios and so on. Each, Biden and Trump, is, capitally, a signed up member. What, then, is really on the ballot? It's the least important election in history when it ought to be one of the most important. The nuances of the economic are not even remotely explained.