Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's good and all but no one on the internet has the right to tell someone else if he's following the "club's values" or not. You're like him and me, just some posters on an internet forum and nothing else. No offense but that's really a very arrogant way of talking.
None taken. And I agree, it is arrogant. Many years of success breed arrogance and expectations. Not only about performance and results of the club but also about its supporters. I'm tired of reading negative bs on here just because someone demands *EVERYTHING* and *NOW*. That's not how the world works.

I am more than happy with the performance and results of the club right now. We are doing better than I (notice, I, as in MY OPINION) expected for this stage of the new team development under our manager. And when someone comes and dumps a load of nothing just because they have a personal grief with given manager, I expect a bit more effort and argumentation. Not soundbites that are factually incorrect.
 
There’s probably some Arsenal fans out there as we speak crying “we should always compete” as well. It doesn’t quite work that way though, unfortunately.
 
Actually, the 'corporate' ones are already defined here: https://www.manutd.com/en/club/club-charter
But that's not what I had in mind. I was more thinking about what Sir Alex said in his farewell speech. You can either listen to it or read it, if you need reminding.

That final speech by Sir Alex has to be one of the worse things he could have said. It is the sole reason why Moyes lasted longer than he should have done. Van Gaal should have been sacked when we lost 3-0 to Stoke at Christmas. And even now 8 years later fans are still using it as a reason to back every single manager. The only thing a United fan should care about is winning the league and Champions League. If we can’t do either the club is underachieving. The rotation of managers doesn’t stop Bayern, Juventus and Real being there or there about every season.
 
That final speech by Sir Alex has to be one of the worse things he could have said. It is the sole reason why Moyes lasted longer than he should have done. Van Gaal should have been sacked when we lost 3-0 to Stoke at Christmas. And even now 8 years later fans are still using it as a reason to back every single manager. The only thing a United fan should care about is winning the league and Champions League. If we can’t do either the club is underachieving. The rotation of managers doesn’t stop Bayern, Juventus and Real being there or there about every season.
So, there isn't any other context for the different situations we find ourselves to those clubs, you think?
 
So, there isn't any other context for the different situations we find ourselves to those clubs, you think?

We have spent more than all those clubs. We could do anything those clubs do in the transfer market. We should be able to attract the best managers, the best players, the best youth players. The club is run like shit. I cannot understand how an institution the size of United would then hire a manager with no prior experience at the top level. It wouldn’t happen in any other industry. 8 years on from Sir Alex’s retirement and we still haven’t had an attacking manager. Moyes - defensive, Van Gaal - possession, Mourinho - defensive, Solskjaer - counter attack. That’s why United fans are not happy because we want to win with attacking football.

Ole has done some things right but I can’t see us winning trophies under him. Whenever the pressure is on we end up losing. His entire tenure has been a constant chase to reach the pack, we are just about to get there, and then the team blows it. To beat PSG and Leipzig and still not get out the group sums up his tenure.
 
We have spent more than all those clubs. We could do anything those clubs do in the transfer market. We should be able to attract the best managers, the best players, the best youth players. The club is run like shit. I cannot understand how an institution the size of United would then hire a manager with no prior experience at the top level. It wouldn’t happen in any other industry. 8 years on from Sir Alex’s retirement and we still haven’t had an attacking manager. Moyes - defensive, Van Gaal - possession, Mourinho - defensive, Solskjaer - counter attack. That’s why United fans are not happy because we want to win with attacking football.

Ole has done some things right but I can’t see us winning trophies under him. Whenever the pressure is on we end up losing. His entire tenure has been a constant chase to reach the pack, we are just about to get there, and then the team blows it. To beat PSG and Leipzig and still not get out the group sums up his tenure.
I disagree with most of what you've written but the one thing that's really incorrect is what United fans feel and want.

A huge part of United's supporters are quite happy with our manager. You may not be due to all kinds of reasons (most of which I disagree with because I think the way you look at our position and reality is irrational) but that doesn't change it for others.
 
That final speech by Sir Alex has to be one of the worse things he could have said. It is the sole reason why Moyes lasted longer than he should have done. Van Gaal should have been sacked when we lost 3-0 to Stoke at Christmas. And even now 8 years later fans are still using it as a reason to back every single manager. The only thing a United fan should care about is winning the league and Champions League. If we can’t do either the club is underachieving. The rotation of managers doesn’t stop Bayern, Juventus and Real being there or there about every season.


It was David Moyes who knocked Manchester United off their perch. We are still struggling because of him. He should have been sacked a long time back and so should have been every manager who failed. As you say changing managers have not stopped Bayern, Real, Juve, Barca from winning. Koeman is going to be sacked if he does not win this season.
 
I disagree with most of what you've written but the one thing that's really incorrect is what United fans feel and want.

A huge part of United's supporters are quite happy with our manager. You may not be due to all kinds of reasons (most of which I disagree with because I think the way you look at our position and reality is irrational) but that doesn't change it for others.

The club is one of the highest spenders over the last 8 years and we still struggle to make top 4. I’d say you’re the one being irrational about our current situation.
 
The club is one of the highest spenders over the last 8 years and we still struggle to make top 4. I’d say you’re the one being irrational about our current situation.
And for me the context of that spending, the consequences and the current reality are what matters. A big chunk of that spend are not even at the club now.
 
If we draw or lose to Leeds then certain people will be saying Bielsa schools Ole, but if we win then it'll be only because we have better players. That "switch the managers" argument will soon be floating again. The amount of disrepect this manager gets every fecking match.
 
And for me the context of that spending, the consequences and the current reality are what matters. A big chunk of that spend are not even at the club now.

We haven’t learnt any lessons though. £80m on Maguire? He’s not worth a world record fee for a defender. £45m for Wan Bissaka? The only thing he can do is a last ditch challenge and that’s usually because he’s out of position. These are Ole’s signings. This summer we chased Sancho to then sign two RW who won’t be in the squad for years. Cavani was available all summer but we waited for the last week to sign him, and then he wasn’t match fit for the beginning of the season.

The only player keeping this team ticking is Bruno. If he gets injured our form will dive off a cliff. The table is tight at the moment and many fans are seeing our game in hand as a guaranteed 3 points and then we would be second. But there 8 clubs who can all say the same thing at the moment.
 
We haven’t learnt any lessons though. £80m on Maguire? He’s not worth a world record fee for a defender.
Maguire's price was neither set by Ole nor was negotiable. We wanted him (far before Ole came as manager) and we got him.
£45m for Wan Bissaka? The only thing he can do is a last ditch challenge and that’s usually because he’s out of position. These are Ole’s signings.
This is ridiculous and not true. I have my concerns about Wan-Bissaka's positioning but your take is simplistic to the extreme.
This summer we chased Sancho to then sign two RW who won’t be in the squad for years.
So Ole is at fault for Dortmund not willing to sell him for a reasonable price? Or is he at fault for the club buying two young potential future stars?

What exactly are you saying? We shouldn't go for young talent? Or we should pay whatever the selling club asks? I thought you weren't happy with the £80m spent on Maguire? Would you have been happy with United paying the amount Dortmund asked?
Cavani was available all summer but we waited for the last week to sign him, and then he wasn’t match fit for the beginning of the season.
First, Cavani probably wanted to see what his options were before signing for any club. He was touted as potential signing for Juventus and Atletico Madrid before he was linked with us. Second, if we wanted to sign hum earlier, we would have had to offer him the a package that would immediately convince him. Since your agenda and way of looking at things is quite obvious, I can tell that you wouldn't have been quite happy if we signed him for ridiculous wages closer to De Gea's. His fitness had a lot do with how far back he played his last game of football too.
The only player keeping this team ticking is Bruno. If he gets injured our form will dive off a cliff.
And that, again, is somehow Ole's fault? I guess when the best players of other teams get injured and their form suffers, it's their managers' fault too?
The table is tight at the moment and many fans are seeing our game in hand as a guaranteed 3 points and then we would be second. But there 8 clubs who can all say the same thing at the moment.
How is that Ole's fault now? He should not only win games for us but erase points for our opponents? Football games are played by TWO teams. Premier League consists of TWENTY clubs. It's not only Manchester United and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. Have some respect for everyone else.

And most of all, revisit your arguments and consider if you are being fair, rational and reasonable or you are simply slapping Ole's name to everything you can think of and then decide it was his fault. Because it surely looks that way to me.
 
How long until this "rebuild" finishes and we can start demanding results? it seems to me its just a lazy narrative to ease preassure.

You can go as far as you want mate, but wont be made a full member if you dont learn how to debate without insulting.



How much results do you need in the league we won last 6 of 7.


You demanded and you got it
 
Maguire's price was neither set by Ole nor was negotiable. We wanted him (far before Ole came as manager) and we got him.

This is ridiculous and not true. I have my concerns about Wan-Bissaka's positioning but your take is simplistic to the extreme.

So Ole is at fault for Dortmund not willing to sell him for a reasonable price? Or is he at fault for the club buying two young potential future stars?

What exactly are you saying? We shouldn't go for young talent? Or we should pay whatever the selling club asks? I thought you weren't happy with the £80m spent on Maguire? Would you have been happy with United paying the amount Dortmund asked?

First, Cavani probably wanted to see what his options were before signing for any club. He was touted as potential signing for Juventus and Atletico Madrid before he was linked with us. Second, if we wanted to sign hum earlier, we would have had to offer him the a package that would immediately convince him. Since your agenda and way of looking at things is quite obvious, I can tell that you wouldn't have been quite happy if we signed him for ridiculous wages closer to De Gea's. His fitness had a lot do with how far back he played his last game of football too.

And that, again, is somehow Ole's fault? I guess when the best players of other teams get injured and their form suffers, it's their managers' fault too?

How is that Ole's fault now? He should not only win games for us but erase points for our opponents? Football games are played by TWO teams. Premier League consists of TWENTY clubs. It's not only Manchester United and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. Have some respect for everyone else.

And most of all, revisit your arguments and consider if you are being fair, rational and reasonable or you are simply slapping Ole's name to everything you can think of and then decide it was his fault. Because it surely looks that way to me.

My words you really have some love in for Ole don’t you? Ole is not to blame for all the issues at United, I never said that. Most of your counter arguments are just waffle. Ole clearly has a major say in who we sign as the manager and we don’t have a DOF. He will know our transfer budget and how much players are going to cost. To suggest otherwise is naive at best.
 
That final speech by Sir Alex has to be one of the worse things he could have said. It is the sole reason why Moyes lasted longer than he should have done. Van Gaal should have been sacked when we lost 3-0 to Stoke at Christmas. And even now 8 years later fans are still using it as a reason to back every single manager. The only thing a United fan should care about is winning the league and Champions League. If we can’t do either the club is underachieving. The rotation of managers doesn’t stop Bayern, Juventus and Real being there or there about every season.
Well said. What other 'big club' would accept mediocrity for years and years? Ole needs to be in a title fight up until the end of april at the very least and finish top 4 at the very least to get another season. Woody was ruthless with Moyes and VG for not getting top 4 and if Ole ends up top 4 he needs to be winning the title next season.
 
I disagree with most of what you've written but the one thing that's really incorrect is what United fans feel and want.

A huge part of United's supporters are quite happy with our manager. You may not be due to all kinds of reasons (most of which I disagree with because I think the way you look at our position and reality is irrational) but that doesn't change it for others.
Can you clarify what most you disagree with and say why?
 
Like any other industry, professional football needs and always has new generation, including head coach or manager. It is always a process to gel and how it goes depends a lot on the structure in place.
We as fans cannot actively change the ownership and management structure. It’s that simple. But, it doesn’t mean the appointment of Ole by the owners is fundamentally wrong.
Our performance as a team is obviously on an upward trend. We did have some crazy even laughable mistakes/errors in many games, here or there. But the trend is so clear to see if one wants to.
Combined with the fact that Ole works well with this structure, isn’t it more rational to support Ole and his vision. He as a new generation manager, has new idea. Please don’t bash him just because of his CV. It’s so ridiculous! By that logic, this world will be a static, dead one.
Also, our center back partnership is one of the best in the league. We did overpay the transfer fees but it’s due to the fact that we did not have better options at the time. Those players are human, therefore, have flaws for sure. I guess some people just think to get 11 so-called world best or even better 11 superheroes, will gives us a team back to top. This is a team sports! The individual flaw is not the problem, but it’s how to find the formula to compliment/hide flaws and maximize the overall capability as a team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan
It is going to get very interesting here no matter what the result will be.
 
Have to give him credits with the squad building and transfers.
It's not perfect nor great and does deserve to be criticize in some aspects but I can appreciate the "sensible" thinking and fair planning behind it.

GK: sorted 20/21 - De Gea, Henderson

RB: not sorted yet - AWB, ??? (Williams, TFM)
CB: not even close - Mag, Lind, ???, ??? (Axel)
LB: sorted 20/21 - Shaw, Telles

DM: nope, and I don't think we're interested in getting one, thus explain the 4231 system - ??, Matic
CM: sorted, sort of, for now 20/21 - Pogba, Fred, McT (VDB, Matic)
AM: sorted, kinda 20/21 - Bruno, VDB (Pogba)

RW: no way, but the attempts are there - ??, Greenwood, Mata (Rashford, Pellistri, Diallo)
LW: sorted, overloaded with suitable players 19/20 - Rashford, James (Martial, Greenwood, Pogba, VDB)

CF: sorted, for now 20/21 - Martial, Cavani (Rashford, Greenwood)

Sure upgrading the sorted positions would be good, but we're down to 4 unsorted positions left, actually 3 because I highly doubt we're interested in getting a DM. Matic is playing like a CM in our default 2DMs system. It is an interesting squad, balance. The future problem of the squad is of course once Pogba left, we're in need of another midfielder, especially a creative one.

Priorities
1st - CB, seriously this is in danger. We have been surviving with no RW all this time, but one injury to one of Mag-Lind and we shall see Shaw, McT and Matic playing CB then. Sure, you could argue Shaw may be a better choice at CB, but that'll thin out our LB options. It's freaky we were "okay" so far with just the two of them and the other CBs occasionally playing. Lucky, but no way it'll last long.

2nd - CM, because of Pogba leaving. Very likely that will happen. Get a good one so that player will settle down early as we shaft Pog-out of the team gradually towards his exit. I'm yet to see this plan in motion by the club and Ole. Use up Pogba as long as he's here, but at the same time, prepare early after he's gone <-- surely that should be in Ole's mind now no? unless he's that naive into believing he can seduce Pogba to stay longer.

3rd - RW to basically improve our attacks. Either the players we have step-up or we get a new one in the future. Not an immediate problem because we are yet to test the two new players, but it is the biggest ignored problem we have, finally one of our managers, Ole addressed it last summer.

4th - RB. We have been over playing Bissaka and "afraid" to try TFM and Williams more. It's a very peculiar case.. I think TFM is good enough as a 2nd choice but seems Ole just doesn't trust him. Williams are definitely lacking and have been on a nice free fall of form since he's given the golden contract.
 
I wonder how on Earth Pool are top of the league, qualified from their CL group having had as much pre-season as we did. So it is not just circumstances, it is coaching. Let us see what we do against Leeds tonight, surely we can't blame lack of pre-season training in mid-December. Come on Ole, do not let the scousers be out of sight by New Year. You need to show that you're capable of getting an absolute maximum out of your players. If you are hoping to get a squad of new 25 players, you are mistaken. This is not possible in top-level football. The Board must be absolutely sure that the players improve under you, otherwise they risk losing hundreds of millions while getting 0 return on investments made.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My words you really have some love in for Ole don’t you? Ole is not to blame for all the issues at United, I never said that. Most of your counter arguments are just waffle. Ole clearly has a major say in who we sign as the manager and we don’t have a DOF. He will know our transfer budget and how much players are going to cost. To suggest otherwise is naive at best.
Yes, of course he has a major say. And I like the players he brought. Maguire is Manchester United captain and England vice-captain. One of the best defenders in the world. Whether you agree with that is a different story.

As for Sancho, it's not Ole who decides how much we pay, I hope you know that. And even if he was, than even better that he didn't bend to Dortmund's blackmail.

And finally, didn't the fact that both van Gaal and Mourinho publicly say that the manager at Manchester United does not have the final say in transfers tell you everything there is to know on that topic?
 
I wonder how on Earth Pool are top of the league, qualified from their CL group having had as much pre-season as we did. So it is not just circumstances, it is coaching.

That maybe because they're having a better team and they had a much easier CL group? Have you thought about it from that angle?

Let us see what we do against Leeds tonight, surely we can't blame lack of pre-season training in mid-December.

I don't think anyone's been using the lack of pre-season excuse since after the October international break. Not sure where you're getting that from

Come on Ole, do not let the scousers be out of sight by New Year. You need to show that you're capable of getting an absolute maximum out of your players.

Are they even out of sight? They're 8 points ahead of us and we've played 2 less games. Win the games in hand and we're 2nd, 2 points behind Pool

QUOTE="Water Melon, post: 26520818, member: 84221"]
The Board must be absolutely sure that the players improve under you, otherwise they risk losing hundreds of millions while getting 0 return on investments made.
[/QUOTE]

Go back to Dec'18. How many players were a part of the squad that people said can be a part of PL winning side - I'd say it was DDG, Pogba and Rashford. That's it. Maybe add Martial, McT as squad players
Come to today, and most people would agree that in addition to the DDG and Rashy, Shaw, Bruno, Greenwood, Martial, Fred are good enough. Lindelof, Maguire as part of the squad if not the starting XI (Personally, they can be starters as well, Maguire atleast). You can make a case for AWB as well. So, I'm not sure what improvement are you looking for?
 
I wonder how on Earth Pool are top of the league, qualified from their CL group having had as much pre-season as we did. So it is not just circumstances, it is coaching. Let us see what we do against Leeds tonight, surely we can't blame lack of pre-season training in mid-December. Come on Ole, do not let the scousers be out of sight by New Year. You need to show that you're capable of getting an absolute maximum out of your players. If you are hoping to get a squad of new 25 players, you are mistaken. This is not possible in top-level football. The Board must be absolutely sure that the players improve under you, otherwise they risk losing hundreds of millions while getting 0 return on investments made.


Seriously ? Do you even believe what you are writing ?

As much pre-season as we did ? They played their last game july 26th - for us it was august 16th

As for qualified from C.L - I agree Ajax, Midt-Jylland and Atalanta is about the same level as PSG, Leipzig and a team from Turkey - of course!

And Liverpool were 33 points better than us last year - so if they still are better, it's more than just coaching. It is also they started with better players
 
It was David Moyes who knocked Manchester United off their perch. We are still struggling because of him. He should have been sacked a long time back and so should have been every manager who failed. As you say changing managers have not stopped Bayern, Real, Juve, Barca from winning. Koeman is going to be sacked if he does not win this season.

If you have the best team by far - like the 4 clubs you mention - who are basically in a league of their own in terms of size, finances etc - changing managers every 12-24 months could work. But in the P.L where there are several clubs with so much money and very good football clubs - that simply wont work. Do you seriously believe any new manager could overtake Liverpool ?

"This is what you have to work with - we expect 90 points from 38 matches or you will be fired."

Do you ever think before you write ?
 
Can you clarify what most you disagree with and say why?
Ok, I did already respond in detail to that poster's next response but here goes the Sunday special:

We have spent more than all those clubs.
Yes, we have. Under 4 different managers who all have different ideas about what their version of Manchester United should look like. That means players churn, devaluation of assets and ending up with a group of players that are not the desired squad by any of those 4 managers. I think that has been made abundantly clear by both Louis van Gaal and Mourinho in their media coverage. Ole now has Rojo, Jones, Lingard and Romero just rotting in the squad while Dalot and Pereira are playing on loan. But I guess any manager you replace Ole with immediately makes all those title-winning footballers and at least one of them competes for the Ballon D'or the next year?

We could do anything those clubs do in the transfer market. We should be able to attract the best managers, the best players, the best youth players.
This, for me, is one of the biggest logical fallacies with Manchester United fans. Yes, we have the money to do whatever we want, in theory. But life doesn't work like that. For any player transfer to happen you need the following sides to agree: selling club (unless out of contract, like Cavani), player, player's agent, buying club. I see that our club is being attacked by fans for not giving into selling clubs' demands (Sancho). Then it other cases the club is being attacked for giving into demands (Maguire). In different situations fans say we should never deal with sh!t agents like Raiola (Pogba) but in other cases we should have done everything to get players in (Haaland).

Now there is also the players' perspective. What has Manchester United won since 2013? One FA Cup, one League Cup and one Europa League. And we have qualified for the Champions League...4 times? Fans think that such recent performance makes us the most attractive destination for EVERY player in the world we may want to get? That puts us even lower than teams like Sevilla. I really wish people would one day wake up and be a bit smarter but then again I'm being the fool here..

When we don't have the "here and now" pedigree what does that leave us? Money. We can attract top talent by paying top dollar. We tried that, remember? How did it work out? And it's not like we've given up on that strategy either. I'm just really happy Woodward has calmed down on his Galactico dream and didn't go for someone like Bale, for example.

Ole's transfers have been a resounding success for me. All players still have something to prove. None are relying on their past success. All are yet to hit their peak years (except Cavani who is a stop-gap solution + brings a wealth of experience and I would love to hear from anyone why he hasn't been a good transfer) and have a role to play to in our squad building. The main question mark is Daniel James, who has lost his way in 2020 and I do hope for his sake that he works hard in the background and is prepared to seize his opportunities in the coming league games.

The club is run like shit.
Not sure what the reason and comparison is here. For me, the main argument for this is the fact that the club hired 4 managers that have almost no similarities between them which always meant that with each new manager we need a massive rebuild of the squad and underlying infrastructures.

Another big negative (but this one must be a positive for a lot of fans, judging by their posts on similar topics) is the previous years focus on buying star players. Di Maria, Falcao, Schweinsteiger, Lukaku, Sanchez, even Pogba and Mata. Bastian was over the hill and many pointed so when we got him but he sold a lot of shirts, so difficult to argue with that. Mata has been a good, loyal servant but because of having to play for 4 managers who either didn't need him or didn't know how to use him he never really hit top gear.

And then Pogba. Maybe he was a huge reason why Mourinho was ultimately sacked. We will never know. Maybe his agent speaks without his permission. I doubt it but I guess we will never know about that too. But were people excited when we got #PogBack? You bet they were. And his commercial value for the club has probably paid off his transfer amount by now. Regardless of all that, I think having him in the squad right now is a net negative because of the ethos and spirit Ole is trying to instill in the players. That no one is above the club and they all work for the team, not the other way around. Pogba is a great footballer and he is not selfish on the field but the drama around him off the field is unnecessary, to say the least.

I cannot understand how an institution the size of United would then hire a manager with no prior experience at the top level.
Simplistic and basic argument. If "institutions the size of United" never hired managers with no prior experience at the top level Guardiola probably never would have been the manager he is right now. Real Madrid probably wouldn't have won three Champions League trophies in a row because Zidane wouldn't have been appointed. Even one "beloved" Kenny Dalglish wouldn't have won his 3 titles with Liverpool.

It wouldn’t happen in any other industry.
That's the sign of someone speaking without knowing their stuff. There are countless examples of CEOs promoted internally, inherited the position or identified with potential from a lower position. For anyone interested in a few big cases following similar patterns, I suggest reading The Outsiders. And that's just CEOs. We can spend a whole day arguing if a company CEO is equivalent to a football club's manager. If one decides to go a level lower in company hierarchies (executive management) then the similar cases will multiply ten-fold.

8 years on from Sir Alex’s retirement and we still haven’t had an attacking manager. Moyes - defensive, Van Gaal - possession, Mourinho - defensive, Solskjaer - counter attack.
I don't know how to address this. How does one categorize managers? What type of manager is Klopp, for example? If Solskjaer is a counter-attacking manager, then Klopp is one too, surely. That's Liverpool's biggest strength, catching teams high up the pitch and hitting them with pace.

But then van Gaal is categorized as possession(-based?) manager. Ok, then Guardiola surely is a possession(-based?) manager too, right?

And just for fun and a nice morning mental exercise, what type of manager was Sir Alex? He sure wasn't defensive, right? I think most people would say that his Manchester United teams were best known for their counter-attacking prowess. And if that's true, then....8 years on from Sir Alex's retiremennt and we now have a manager with the same style. And that's bad somehow?

That’s why United fans are not happy because we want to win with attacking football.
With our very last game we have broken another record of scoring 3 or more goals in consecutive away games. That's just the latest ATTACKING record. For me, we are playing quite the attacking football under Ole. Sometimes we lure opposition to create space to ATTACK and I guess some fans do not like or understand that. I wonder what's the ideal style they would prefer. Is it Klopp's or Guardiola's, or something else?

Ole has done some things right but I can’t see us winning trophies under him.
It would've been amazing if you could see things into the future. If you truly can, please use your gift for good.

Whenever the pressure is on we end up losing.
I disagree. Winning away to PSG in March 2019 was under some pressure, wouldn't you agree? Or maybe we were expecting to lose and it doesn't count. Ok, how about Leicester on the final day of last season? Not enough pressure?

Losing to Chelsea, City and Sevilla in the three semi-finals last season sucked. A lot. And from those three I would say that our team really should've beat Sevilla. And Martial really should've scored one of his many chances. But teams lose big games and they move on. For anyone who hasn't been around or paid attention, check out the first 3 years of Klopp's reign at Liverpool. It's a story of lost finals. I really wished they sacked him so they wouldn't go on to win the Champions League and Premier League trophies in the last 2 years....

Of course, the fact that someone else overcame such big losses doesn't mean Ole will. But the statement "whenever the pressure is on we end up losing" is both not true and not indicative of the future.

His entire tenure has been a constant chase to reach the pack, we are just about to get there, and then the team blows it.
What were and are people's expectations? He replaced a Mourinho side that was desperately falling down the table. And Mourinho himself couldnt' secure back-to-back top 4 finishes. Neither did Louis van Gaal. But Solskjaer is expected to not chase but lead the pack? Why? And by the way, he did deliver top 4 last season.

Is our squad better than the other 19 teams in the Premier League? Are our players that good to expect we are the best team in the country?

To beat PSG and Leipzig and still not get out the group sums up his tenure.
The Leipzig loss was heavy and the several games in a row when we start slow to concede is a major worry. While individual games can be attributed to individual player mistakes, there is a pattern of poor starts in recent games. I hope no one believes that Ole and his staff do not see that. I am sure he is addressing this issue. And I'm sure because he has addressed every other issue he has faced since being appointed.

And the disappointment from not progressing from the group comes only after beating PSG away and Leipzig at home. I don't know how other people really felt when the draw was made but I wasn't confident we will get out of this group. PSG are still last season's finalists and Leipzig are still last season's semi-finalists. The sad truth is that we blew our chance in Istanbul with stupid mistakes. I class them as individual mistakes but that's me.

People still talk about us being inconsistent which really doesn't hold water. We are the most consistent and in-form team in the Premier League in 2020. We have had a few bad games but are delivering results. And I hope that continues today.

Text in purple are quotes from Josep Dowling's post.
 
Yes, of course he has a major say. And I like the players he brought. Maguire is Manchester United captain and England vice-captain. One of the best defenders in the world. Whether you agree with that is a different story.

As for Sancho, it's not Ole who decides how much we pay, I hope you know that. And even if he was, than even better that he didn't bend to Dortmund's blackmail.

And finally, didn't the fact that both van Gaal and Mourinho publicly say that the manager at Manchester United does not have the final say in transfers tell you everything there is to know on that topic?

What was the plan if we didn’t get Sancho? Clearly there wasn’t one which is why we ended signing players that bolstered the squad but it’s questionable whether any player strengthened the first 11. I am not blaming Ole for this situation but at some point you have to chasing and move on. We should have set a deadline with Sancho at least a week before the transfer deadline day so we had time to sign other options. That dithering meant we have gone into yet another season without a natural RW and none of our signings were ready at the beginning of the season.

I think very few people will agree with you with Maguire being one of the best CB in the world. He’s a ‘good’ defender but we should have never paid £80m for him. We also had Lindelof. Knowing you already have one CB who lacks pace why would you sign a defensive partner for him that has the same weakness?

Van Gaal and José are both covering their backs for the mistakes they made. Technically what they said is correct but it’s the same for every single club, they still choose the targets and leave an incompetent Woodward to get the deal done.
 
If we draw or lose to Leeds then certain people will be saying Bielsa schools Ole, but if we win then it'll be only because we have better players. That "switch the managers" argument will soon be floating again. The amount of disrepect this manager gets every fecking match.
Biesla is a better manager than Ole regardless of the result today. Even Ole inners aren't going to argue that point.
Whether his temperament makes it suitable for him to manage United is a different question.
 
What was the plan if we didn’t get Sancho? Clearly there wasn’t one which is why we ended signing players that bolstered the squad but it’s questionable whether any player strengthened the first 11. I am not blaming Ole for this situation but at some point you have to chasing and move on. We should have set a deadline with Sancho at least a week before the transfer deadline day so we had time to sign other options. That dithering meant we have gone into yet another season without a natural RW and none of our signings were ready at the beginning of the season.
I don't know who did Ole want for our right wing. I don't think you know either. Suppose he wanted Sancho and didn't identify any other senior player target because they would be a bigger risk considering any potential big transfer fee. Would you have bought someone just for the same of buying?

If we did that and that player didn't fit in, you would blame Ole for it, wouldn't you? I'd much rather wait and get the player we want, when we can, then go and buy someone just so we check a box on a list.

I think very few people will agree with you with Maguire being one of the best CB in the world. He’s a ‘good’ defender but we should have never paid £80m for him.
I don't care too much about people agreeing with me. I try to evaluate things from a distance, keeping perspective. One of the world's best managers, Pep Guardiola, has publicly said that he wanted Maguire at City. He said that his club couldn't afford to pay that much for him (mind the timing of that with City's FFP problems).

We also had Lindelof. Knowing you already have one CB who lacks pace why would you sign a defensive partner for him that has the same weakness?
Can you tell me how many goals did we concede because our defenders lack pace? We also have Bailly and Tuanzebe in the squad, who are considerably faster but not playing. I read a lot of people are saying we should buy Upamecano. I've watched quite a few Leipzig games in this calendar year and I can assure you, you won't be happy with him if you think Maguire is not a great defender.

It has also been quite clear that Ole wanted Bailly to partner Maguire but he has proven both too injury-prone and error-prone to be reliable. And with defenders what you want first and foremost is them to be fit so they can play together a lot and build a partnership and understanding.

Van Gaal and José are both covering their backs for the mistakes they made. Technically what they said is correct but it’s the same for every single club, they still choose the targets and leave an incompetent Woodward to get the deal done.
Van Gaal is on the record saying he didn't chose the targets. Mourinho is on the record saying that his targets were not delivered. Ole is smarter and more respectful (for now, who knows what will happen in the future) with his interviews and not giving anything away with regards to transfers. It's almost like he has learned from one Sir Alex Ferguson in that regard ;)
 
That maybe because they're having a better team and they had a much easier CL group? Have you thought about it from that angle?



I don't think anyone's been using the lack of pre-season excuse since after the October international break. Not sure where you're getting that from



Are they even out of sight? They're 8 points ahead of us and we've played 2 less games. Win the games in hand and we're 2nd, 2 points behind Pool

QUOTE="Water Melon, post: 26520818, member: 84221"]
The Board must be absolutely sure that the players improve under you, otherwise they risk losing hundreds of millions while getting 0 return on investments made.

Go back to Dec'18. How many players were a part of the squad that people said can be a part of PL winning side - I'd say it was DDG, Pogba and Rashford. That's it. Maybe add Martial, McT as squad players
Come to today, and most people would agree that in addition to the DDG and Rashy, Shaw, Bruno, Greenwood, Martial, Fred are good enough. Lindelof, Maguire as part of the squad if not the starting XI (Personally, they can be starters as well, Maguire atleast). You can make a case for AWB as well. So, I'm not sure what improvement are you looking for?
[/QUOTE]
Pool have a much better manager who constantly improves his team and a serial winner, while United have a manager who is a loser in managers' world. Klopp buys players and improves them, Ole buys players and they start to stagnate. Maguire included. Klopp relies on collective play which results in building a winning machine, Solskjaer buys extremely expensive defenders and they continue to feck up week in week out. If Ole has been in charge of Pool for 2 years and Jurgen in charge of United, I know exactly who I would bet on winning the Prem.
 
Biesla is a better manager than Ole regardless of the result today. Even Ole inners aren't going to argue that point.
Whether his temperament makes it suitable for him to manage United is a different question.
How do you define better? You state that Bielsa is better, but then proceed to backtrack and say that he might not be suitable to United.

Ole finished third last year. Would Bielsa have done that? I don’t think so. Bielsa got Leeds promoted. Would Ole have done that? I don’t think so. Yet the latter is because Bielsa is ‘better’ than Ole, but the former is because Bielsa is just not suited to United. I don’t think Guardiola would have gotten them promoted, which means that Bielsa is ‘better’ than him too, right? Stating that one top flight manager is simply ‘better’ than another one when they manage very different clubs with different expectations and culture is very one dimensional.
 
Pool have a much better manager who constantly improves his team and a serial winner, while United have a manager who is a loser in managers' world. Klopp buys players and improves them, Ole buys players and they start to stagnate. Maguire included. Klopp relies on collective play which results in building a winning machine, Solskjaer buys extremely expensive defenders and they continue to feck up week in week out. If Ole has been in charge of Pool for 2 years and Jurgen in charge of United, I know exactly who I would bet on winning the Prem.
No one's debating who the better manager is between Klopp and Ole, but surely "manager who is a loser in manager's world" is a bit too harsh considering his side finished above a side managed by Poch/Mou in his 1st season in charge.

Then there is the stagnation point - like I said, in Dec'18 we thought we were maybe 9 players away from having a PL winning side. Right now we're 2 or 3 players away in starting XI. Martial has become better, Rashy is playing his best football, Bruno is arguably among the best players in the world on form, Shaw is looking like among the best LBs in the league. Fred, who was labelled as among our worst signings, has among an integral part of the team and I can go on.

Then is the defence argument - We had among the best defences in the league last season (3rd best in terms of GA and xGA). Any goal that is conceded is because of a feck-up, and that rule applies not just to us, but literally every side. Hell, do you think TAA, VVD, Gomez and Robertson had a flawless game every single time they stepped on the pitch?

And then there's the last point - After Klopp's 2nd season, they finished 4th I believe? Klopp had won nothing in his 1st 2 years, and that's nothing to be ashamed about. Building a team with a good foundation will take time and effort, else we can go the Mou route and have a cycle where we need to replace every single player every three years
 
For some people the rebuilding started after Ole took over. Before that they didn't care much. There are lots of people here who are supporters of Ole more than being supporters of Manchester United. The same with supporters of certain players instead of the club.

No it started the day Fergie resigned.

Moyes and Ed made a mess of it, when they spent all summer chasing unrealistic targets. LvG made a mess of it by completely ripping open the squad and making too many poor signings and Jose made a mess of it by splashing loads of money on instant impact signing that he thought would win him the league.

Moyes was fumbling around in the dark, LvG tried to rebuild, but ultimately failed and Jose i dont think ever wanted to do this whole long term rebuild thing.
 
If we draw or lose to Leeds then certain people will be saying Bielsa schools Ole, but if we win then it'll be only because we have better players. That "switch the managers" argument will soon be floating again. The amount of disrepect this manager gets every fecking match.
But Bielsa is a better manager. How is that even a question? is he good enough for united, I don't know, but I don't think so. Is Ole good enough for us? absolutely not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.