Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
All you guys entrenched on 'sides' need to take a break from here. It's the same monotonous posts rehashed over and over. Except the longer the season goes on, the more paragraphs that get added to make the same points over and over.

Newsflash, none of you are right. He's doing a job somewhere in the middle of the mass hysteria and hyperbole. It's not amazing nor is it horrendous. He's had very good spells and awful spells. In some ways he's lucky to still be here, but he's here and I reckon he'll be here for the foreseeable.
 
All you guys entrenched on 'sides' need to take a break from here. It's the same monotonous posts rehashed over and over. Except the longer the season goes on, the more paragraphs that get added to make the same points over and over.

Newsflash, none of you are right. He's doing a job somewhere in the middle of the mass hysteria and hyperbole. It's not amazing nor is it horrendous. He's had very good spells and awful spells. In some ways he's lucky to still be here, but he's here and I reckon he'll be here for the foreseeable.
At United you should be doing an amazing job to survive. That is the whole point of this thread.
 
Last edited:
At United you should be an amazing job to survive. That is the whole point of this thread.

That's absolutely fair. I'm not his biggest fan as a manager but repeating the same points ad nauseam isn't going to achieve anything. Some of the essays over the last few pages have been paragraphs of waffle and zero substance.
 
I think at this point, given where we where 18mnths ago, it’s safe to say that any poster still calling for Ole to be sacked immediately has a clear agenda and would rather hurt the club than be proved wrong on an Internet forum
 
All you guys entrenched on 'sides' need to take a break from here. It's the same monotonous posts rehashed over and over. Except the longer the season goes on, the more paragraphs that get added to make the same points over and over.

Newsflash, none of you are right. He's doing a job somewhere in the middle of the mass hysteria and hyperbole. It's not amazing nor is it horrendous. He's had very good spells and awful spells. In some ways he's lucky to still be here, but he's here and I reckon he'll be here for the foreseeable.
Yeah, exactly, that is why he should go. We are not Everton Or Crystal Palace.
 
I think at this point, given where we where 18mnths ago, it’s safe to say that any poster still calling for Ole to be sacked immediately has a clear agenda and would rather hurt the club than be proved wrong on an Internet forum

Pretty much sums it up for me. I remember the majority of posters used to say 'I dont care about winning, i just want to see good/exciting football'. To be fair to Ole the football compared to Jose/LVG is night and day.

There is no stand out candidate to replace him at the moment, it's just about 50/50 for me as to whether or not Poch would do any better so unless out results nose dive, then I would not be sacking him just yet.

At time of writing we are on course for second place and are at least theoretically still in the mix for the league, so sacking not warranted atm. The CL debacle however was very disappointing.
 
Priorities
1st - CB, seriously this is in danger. We have been surviving with no RW all this time, but one injury to one of Mag-Lind and we shall see Shaw, McT and Matic playing CB then. Sure, you could argue Shaw may be a better choice at CB, but that'll thin out our LB options. It's freaky we were "okay" so far with just the two of them and the other CBs occasionally playing. Lucky, but no way it'll last long.

(...)

3rd - RW to basically improve our attacks. Either the players we have step-up or we get a new one in the future. Not an immediate problem because we are yet to test the two new players, but it is the biggest ignored problem we have, finally one of our managers, Ole addressed it last summer.

Definitely need a quicker CB if the plan is to press high with a high defensive line. Lindelof and Maguire can compete for the other CB spot. And yes, better protection also needed in midfield, at least a backup option to Fred. But I think the issue with RW also plays a part in that. At current, the play is so packed in the center/left. If there was someone more involved on the right as well, that would help alleviate some pressure on the defence too. More passing options, easier to keep possession, shift it around across the width of the pitch etc. Everything works in tandem. For me, RW is the most pressing concern.
 
How do you define better? You state that Bielsa is better, but then proceed to backtrack and say that he might not be suitable to United.

Ole finished third last year. Would Bielsa have done that? I don’t think so. Bielsa got Leeds promoted. Would Ole have done that? I don’t think so. Yet the latter is because Bielsa is ‘better’ than Ole, but the former is because Bielsa is just not suited to United. I don’t think Guardiola would have gotten them promoted, which means that Bielsa is ‘better’ than him too, right? Stating that one top flight manager is simply ‘better’ than another one when they manage very different clubs with different expectations and culture is very one dimensional.
You are right in some things there but lets not get overboard; give any club to Bielsa and Ole and Bielsa will do better job. It is like comparing Messi and Wilson and saying could Messi do it in Newcastle.
 
You are right in some things there but lets not get overboard; give any club to Bielsa and Ole and Bielsa will do better job. It is like comparing Messi and Wilson and saying could Messi do it in Newcastle.
Since Manchester United is a subset of 'any club', you're saying that Bielsa would have finished above 3rd last season or would have won one of the cups? Not trying to sound condescending, just curious.
 
Since Manchester United is a subset of 'any club', you're saying that Bielsa would have finished above 3rd last season or would have won one of the cups? Not trying to sound condescending, just curious.
Absolutely. 3rd and one cup. I could bet on it.
The thing which annoys me the most about all this Oleout/Olein thing is that some of fans hugely underestimate our squad. And when you look how Leeds are playing with average squad....we would be flying with Bielsa in charge
 
Absolutely. 3rd and one cup. I could bet on it.
The thing which annoys me the most about all this Oleout/Olein thing is that some of fans hugely underestimate our squad. And when you look how Leeds are playing with average squad....we would be flying with Bielsa in charge

And who built that squad? And when did this squad building get complete?
 
Absolutely. 3rd and one cup. I could bet on it.
The thing which annoys me the most about all this Oleout/Olein thing is that some of fans hugely underestimate our squad. And when you look how Leeds are playing with average squad....we would be flying with Bielsa in charge
Rubbish. We have a Good first 11, but also big holes with our depth. Bielsa have spent more than us this season, so he has definitely built his squad. We can’t handle the drop of when key players are out. But neither can Leeds. Stop making things up to suit your agenda. And if my memory serves me correct. You will be one of the first ones posting in this thread if we go behind..
 
And who built that squad? And when did this squad building get complete?
That "rebuilding" stuff is nonsense at highest level of football. It is just good excuse for owners, managers, CEOs for bad results. Especially in United way of looking at it where with every manager rebuilding restarts.

As i look at it; manager comes and work with what he has plus some transfers of course. In first year he must get some time but in second....not.
 
Rubbish. We have a Good first 11, but also big holes with our depth. Bielsa have spent more than us this season, so he has definitely built his squad. We can’t handle the drop of when key players are out. But neither can Leeds. Stop making things up to suit your agenda. And if my memory serves me correct. You will be one of the first ones posting in this thread if we go behind..
Nah, i will wait till game ends.
Btw; Ole bought 9 players already. When it starts to be his squad? After he buys all 25?
 
That "rebuilding" stuff is nonsense at highest level of football. It is just good excuse for owners, managers, CEOs for bad results. Especially in United way of looking at it where with every manager rebuilding restarts.

As i look at it; manager comes and work with what he has plus some transfers of course. In first year he must get some time but in second....not.

That's so off the mark. So, you're telling me Pep can impose his style of football on a Pellegrini side without spending money? We all saw what happened there. Klopp didn't work wonders on Rodgers side as well.

If you're going from Mou to Conte to Allegri to Simeone or something like that, maybe, I can see your point. But SAF to Moyes to LVG to Mou to Ole - hell there isn't any succession plan here. And no one is saying you need to replace all the 25 players and that's because skillset of any two systems isn't mutually exclusive, however, in certain cases you need to make wholesale changes. Like Fellaini, Lukaku , Smalling were sold not because they are useless footballers, but because their skillsets are not what Ole is looking for.

Hell, if Poch comes in tomorrow, I don't think anyone will give him this lee-way and that's because the side doesn't require too many changes to implement his play style. However, if Simeone is our next manager, I'd give him 2 -3 years to bring in his players
 
If we win today, we'll be 6W1D in the last 7 PL games, that this discussion is so rampant with some people demanding the manager fired is.. yeah ok. I've written very long paragraphs in this thread before but what else is there to say at this point?
 
That's so off the mark. So, you're telling me Pep can impose his style of football on a Pellegrini side without spending money? We all saw what happened there. Klopp didn't work wonders on Rodgers side as well.

If you're going from Mou to Conte to Allegri to Simeone or something like that, maybe, I can see your point. But SAF to Moyes to LVG to Mou to Ole - hell there isn't any succession plan here. And no one is saying you need to replace all the 25 players and that's because skillset of any two systems isn't mutually exclusive, however, in certain cases you need to make wholesale changes. Like Fellaini, Lukaku , Smalling were sold not because they are useless footballers, but because their skillsets are not what Ole is looking for.

Hell, if Poch comes in tomorrow, I don't think anyone will give him this lee-way and that's because the side doesn't require too many changes to implement his play style. However, if Simeone is our next manager, I'd give him 2 -3 years to bring in his players

LVG to Mourinho was a disaster. Completely opposing styles. Dont know what Woodward was thinking.
 
If we win today, we'll be 6W1D in the last 7 PL games, that this discussion is so rampant with some people demanding the manager fired is.. yeah ok. I've written very long paragraphs in this thread before but what else is there to say at this point?
Results and performances don't necessarily go hand in hand. In the last 7 games how many times have we been on the back foot for large periods only to turn it around? The teams high may be high indeed but so are the lows which is still a big reason there's still a lot of supporters doubting Oles credentials.

For some results are the only thing that matters, for others it's how those results are obtained. Once we get good performances on a more consistent level then people will think differently but until then this thread will keep going round in circles.
 
Ok, I did already respond in detail to that poster's next response but here goes the Sunday special:

We have spent more than all those clubs.
Yes, we have. Under 4 different managers who all have different ideas about what their version of Manchester United should look like. That means players churn, devaluation of assets and ending up with a group of players that are not the desired squad by any of those 4 managers. I think that has been made abundantly clear by both Louis van Gaal and Mourinho in their media coverage. Ole now has Rojo, Jones, Lingard and Romero just rotting in the squad while Dalot and Pereira are playing on loan. But I guess any manager you replace Ole with immediately makes all those title-winning footballers and at least one of them competes for the Ballon D'or the next year?

We could do anything those clubs do in the transfer market. We should be able to attract the best managers, the best players, the best youth players.
This, for me, is one of the biggest logical fallacies with Manchester United fans. Yes, we have the money to do whatever we want, in theory. But life doesn't work like that. For any player transfer to happen you need the following sides to agree: selling club (unless out of contract, like Cavani), player, player's agent, buying club. I see that our club is being attacked by fans for not giving into selling clubs' demands (Sancho). Then it other cases the club is being attacked for giving into demands (Maguire). In different situations fans say we should never deal with sh!t agents like Raiola (Pogba) but in other cases we should have done everything to get players in (Haaland).

Now there is also the players' perspective. What has Manchester United won since 2013? One FA Cup, one League Cup and one Europa League. And we have qualified for the Champions League...4 times? Fans think that such recent performance makes us the most attractive destination for EVERY player in the world we may want to get? That puts us even lower than teams like Sevilla. I really wish people would one day wake up and be a bit smarter but then again I'm being the fool here..

When we don't have the "here and now" pedigree what does that leave us? Money. We can attract top talent by paying top dollar. We tried that, remember? How did it work out? And it's not like we've given up on that strategy either. I'm just really happy Woodward has calmed down on his Galactico dream and didn't go for someone like Bale, for example.

Ole's transfers have been a resounding success for me. All players still have something to prove. None are relying on their past success. All are yet to hit their peak years (except Cavani who is a stop-gap solution + brings a wealth of experience and I would love to hear from anyone why he hasn't been a good transfer) and have a role to play to in our squad building. The main question mark is Daniel James, who has lost his way in 2020 and I do hope for his sake that he works hard in the background and is prepared to seize his opportunities in the coming league games.

The club is run like shit.
Not sure what the reason and comparison is here. For me, the main argument for this is the fact that the club hired 4 managers that have almost no similarities between them which always meant that with each new manager we need a massive rebuild of the squad and underlying infrastructures.

Another big negative (but this one must be a positive for a lot of fans, judging by their posts on similar topics) is the previous years focus on buying star players. Di Maria, Falcao, Schweinsteiger, Lukaku, Sanchez, even Pogba and Mata. Bastian was over the hill and many pointed so when we got him but he sold a lot of shirts, so difficult to argue with that. Mata has been a good, loyal servant but because of having to play for 4 managers who either didn't need him or didn't know how to use him he never really hit top gear.

And then Pogba. Maybe he was a huge reason why Mourinho was ultimately sacked. We will never know. Maybe his agent speaks without his permission. I doubt it but I guess we will never know about that too. But were people excited when we got #PogBack? You bet they were. And his commercial value for the club has probably paid off his transfer amount by now. Regardless of all that, I think having him in the squad right now is a net negative because of the ethos and spirit Ole is trying to instill in the players. That no one is above the club and they all work for the team, not the other way around. Pogba is a great footballer and he is not selfish on the field but the drama around him off the field is unnecessary, to say the least.

I cannot understand how an institution the size of United would then hire a manager with no prior experience at the top level.
Simplistic and basic argument. If "institutions the size of United" never hired managers with no prior experience at the top level Guardiola probably never would have been the manager he is right now. Real Madrid probably wouldn't have won three Champions League trophies in a row because Zidane wouldn't have been appointed. Even one "beloved" Kenny Dalglish wouldn't have won his 3 titles with Liverpool.

It wouldn’t happen in any other industry.
That's the sign of someone speaking without knowing their stuff. There are countless examples of CEOs promoted internally, inherited the position or identified with potential from a lower position. For anyone interested in a few big cases following similar patterns, I suggest reading The Outsiders. And that's just CEOs. We can spend a whole day arguing if a company CEO is equivalent to a football club's manager. If one decides to go a level lower in company hierarchies (executive management) then the similar cases will multiply ten-fold.

8 years on from Sir Alex’s retirement and we still haven’t had an attacking manager. Moyes - defensive, Van Gaal - possession, Mourinho - defensive, Solskjaer - counter attack.
I don't know how to address this. How does one categorize managers? What type of manager is Klopp, for example? If Solskjaer is a counter-attacking manager, then Klopp is one too, surely. That's Liverpool's biggest strength, catching teams high up the pitch and hitting them with pace.

But then van Gaal is categorized as possession(-based?) manager. Ok, then Guardiola surely is a possession(-based?) manager too, right?

And just for fun and a nice morning mental exercise, what type of manager was Sir Alex? He sure wasn't defensive, right? I think most people would say that his Manchester United teams were best known for their counter-attacking prowess. And if that's true, then....8 years on from Sir Alex's retiremennt and we now have a manager with the same style. And that's bad somehow?

That’s why United fans are not happy because we want to win with attacking football.
With our very last game we have broken another record of scoring 3 or more goals in consecutive away games. That's just the latest ATTACKING record. For me, we are playing quite the attacking football under Ole. Sometimes we lure opposition to create space to ATTACK and I guess some fans do not like or understand that. I wonder what's the ideal style they would prefer. Is it Klopp's or Guardiola's, or something else?

Ole has done some things right but I can’t see us winning trophies under him.
It would've been amazing if you could see things into the future. If you truly can, please use your gift for good.

Whenever the pressure is on we end up losing.
I disagree. Winning away to PSG in March 2019 was under some pressure, wouldn't you agree? Or maybe we were expecting to lose and it doesn't count. Ok, how about Leicester on the final day of last season? Not enough pressure?

Losing to Chelsea, City and Sevilla in the three semi-finals last season sucked. A lot. And from those three I would say that our team really should've beat Sevilla. And Martial really should've scored one of his many chances. But teams lose big games and they move on. For anyone who hasn't been around or paid attention, check out the first 3 years of Klopp's reign at Liverpool. It's a story of lost finals. I really wished they sacked him so they wouldn't go on to win the Champions League and Premier League trophies in the last 2 years....

Of course, the fact that someone else overcame such big losses doesn't mean Ole will. But the statement "whenever the pressure is on we end up losing" is both not true and not indicative of the future.

His entire tenure has been a constant chase to reach the pack, we are just about to get there, and then the team blows it.
What were and are people's expectations? He replaced a Mourinho side that was desperately falling down the table. And Mourinho himself couldnt' secure back-to-back top 4 finishes. Neither did Louis van Gaal. But Solskjaer is expected to not chase but lead the pack? Why? And by the way, he did deliver top 4 last season.

Is our squad better than the other 19 teams in the Premier League? Are our players that good to expect we are the best team in the country?

To beat PSG and Leipzig and still not get out the group sums up his tenure.
The Leipzig loss was heavy and the several games in a row when we start slow to concede is a major worry. While individual games can be attributed to individual player mistakes, there is a pattern of poor starts in recent games. I hope no one believes that Ole and his staff do not see that. I am sure he is addressing this issue. And I'm sure because he has addressed every other issue he has faced since being appointed.

And the disappointment from not progressing from the group comes only after beating PSG away and Leipzig at home. I don't know how other people really felt when the draw was made but I wasn't confident we will get out of this group. PSG are still last season's finalists and Leipzig are still last season's semi-finalists. The sad truth is that we blew our chance in Istanbul with stupid mistakes. I class them as individual mistakes but that's me.

People still talk about us being inconsistent which really doesn't hold water. We are the most consistent and in-form team in the Premier League in 2020. We have had a few bad games but are delivering results. And I hope that continues today.

Text in purple are quotes from Josep Dowling's post.

Well put!
 
Results and performances don't necessarily go hand in hand. In the last 7 games how many times have we been on the back foot for large periods only to turn it around? The teams high may be high indeed but so are the lows which is still a big reason there's still a lot of supporters doubting Oles credentials.

For some results are the only thing that matters, for others it's how those results are obtained. Once we get good performances on a more consistent level then people will think differently but until then this thread will keep going round in circles.

Yes, I understand that the goalpost is currently inhabiting the coast of New Zealand.
 
Results and performances don't necessarily go hand in hand. In the last 7 games how many times have we been on the back foot for large periods only to turn it around? The teams high may be high indeed but so are the lows which is still a big reason there's still a lot of supporters doubting Oles credentials.

For some results are the only thing that matters, for others it's how those results are obtained. Once we get good performances on a more consistent level then people will think differently but until then this thread will keep going round in circles.

Yes but there are different way of looking at things.

1) We put ourselves in a position where we always need to catch up - we must improve from minute 1
2) We are good enough to turn things around even when we find ourselves in that position

Both are correct - and that's why we are not title contenders yet. But for longer periods of time we can destroy good opposition (45 minutes against Southampton, 35 minutes against West Ham). We just need to improve our concentration in the first 25-30 minutes of the games. This is a mental thing more than anything - and yes that is a criticism against OGS that it happens over and over again. But it also shows that our best performance now is at the highest level - it's just that our worst performance is too poor still.
 
How do you define better? You state that Bielsa is better, but then proceed to backtrack and say that he might not be suitable to United.

Ole finished third last year. Would Bielsa have done that? I don’t think so. Bielsa got Leeds promoted. Would Ole have done that? I don’t think so. Yet the latter is because Bielsa is ‘better’ than Ole, but the former is because Bielsa is just not suited to United. I don’t think Guardiola would have gotten them promoted, which means that Bielsa is ‘better’ than him too, right? Stating that one top flight manager is simply ‘better’ than another one when they manage very different clubs with different expectations and culture is very one dimensional.

You got a point there. Tactical wise Bielsa may be one of the best ever, but there are much more to football manager than just tactic.

Ole's ability to keep everyone on the same page even in his 3rd year is very important. First time since SAF our team has this kind of "united" with a clear upward trajectory (6th in the first year->3rd in the second year and potential title-challenging in the third year, with the youngest squad in the league).
 
Yes but there are different way of looking at things.

1) We put ourselves in a position where we always need to catch up - we must improve from minute 1
2) We are good enough to turn things around even when we find ourselves in that position

Both are correct - and that's why we are not title contenders yet. But for longer periods of time we can destroy good opposition (45 minutes against Southampton, 35 minutes against West Ham). We just need to improve our concentration in the first 25-30 minutes of the games. This is a mental thing more than anything - and yes that is a criticism against OGS that it happens over and over again. But it also shows that our best performance now is at the highest level - it's just that our worst performance is too poor still.
Balanced post and I think we're more or less on the same page but when people say it's ludicrous that everyone isn't behind Ole then I think it goes further than a glass half full/empty type of scenario.
Yes, I understand that the goalpost is currently inhabiting the coast of New Zealand.
I may be completely off track here but I'm guessing there's a very slight hint of sarcasm in your post.
 
You often wonder do folks who make these crazy posts before a game has even kicked off, are they pissed off when Utd score? Or in this case make a stunning start
 
Great start finally. This is how we should start most games. Pressing and going for the kill after 1-0. Credit to Ole here.
 
What a difference that is! Fantastic stuff! Could almost imagine a wry Fergie smile on the touchline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.