Carl
has permanently erect nipples
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 45,949
Imagine if a player had the best of Xabi Alonso, and Gareth Barry.
You'd get, Xabi Alonso.
Haha genuinely made me lol that Jakey.
Imagine if a player had the best of Xabi Alonso, and Gareth Barry.
You'd get, Xabi Alonso.
Imagine if a player had the best of Xabi Alonso, and Gareth Barry.
You'd get, Xabi Alonso.
Imagine if a player had the best of Xabi Alonso, and Gareth Barry.
You'd get, Xabi Alonso.
Imagine if a player had the best of Xabi Alonso, and Gareth Barry.
You'd get, Xabi Alonso.
Is he better than Carrick?
He isn't as good as Scholes, no. More well rounded but not as good.
I would say he was a bit behind Scholes at his peak, but he's better than the current Scholes. They've got similar passing ability, but Alonso is ahead of him in most other factors of his game and is the better player of the two now.
Of course. Scholes is closer 40 than 30!
I know that, but it's not a reason to say that Scholes is better than Alonso, which is what you said.
What in the absolute feck?
Alonso is miles better than Carrick, who is comfortably better than Barry. It's not even a discussion.
That's all crap from start to finish. He isn't a deep-lying playmaker like Pirlo, he's not one of the best passers in the world like Xavi or Fabregas, and he's about the same player as Carrick. He's nowhere near Scholes at his best.Alonso's one of the best deep lying playmakers in the world and one of the best passers in the world as well. There's a reason he finds himself as the first choice starter in midfield for Real Madrid. It's only now that a lot of people seem to appreciate that as well. He was horrendously underrated for a lot of time he was at Liverpool and we only really saw how crucial to their play he was when he left.
He's on a different level to both Carrick and Barry. I'd say it's ironic that those who call him overrated would probably praise Scholes when both are largely similar players in many respects, with Alonso being the better all-round midfielder of the two. Double standards from those people in my opinion.
That's all crap from start to finish. He isn't a deep-lying playmaker like Pirlo, he's not one of the best passers in the world like Xavi or Fabregas, and he's about the same player as Carrick. He's nowhere near Scholes at his best.
In fairness pretty much everyone on here said Alonso was a level or two above Barry and it was 50-50 on Carrick/Alonso.
What in the absolute feck?
Alonso is miles better than Carrick, who is comfortably better than Barry. It's not even a discussion.
I'd say Carrick is third-tier, if we're doing it like that:
Top tier - Xavi, Iniesta, Pirlo and Scholes at their best
2nd tier - Alonso, Fabregas (currently), Yaya Toure, Schweinsteiger, Sneijder, Gerrard and Essien at their best
3rd tier - Carrick, Van Bommel, Ambrosini
4th tier - Fletcher, Barry, Song, Lucas Leiva (currently)
Tiers of a clown - Adam, Henderson, Spearing
Modric is somewhere between 3 and 2, as was Lampard at his best.
It was bollocks then and is bollocks now.Agreed with your agreement then as now.