Haven’t heard anyone demanding you to go ”all out attack”, but whatever Marc.
We were playing against Chelsea today -- and away to boot. What were you expecting?Defensively we are very good, however, the midfield is struggling to dominate and we look disjointed in attack.
I'm standing by Skinner this week. He might have overstated it a bit, but you have to grant his point: Our best hope against this team was the idea that if they don't score, they can't win -- and apart from the penalty and some woodwork, it worked.Haven’t heard anyone demanding you to go ”all out attack”, but whatever Marc.
Haven’t heard anyone demanding you to go ”all out attack”, but whatever Marc.
I'm not okay with this, although I sort of get your point. We lost 0-6 last game of the season at OT but this was only a 1-0 defeat, and to a penalty. Is that progress? Zero points in both fixtures.I'm okay with this. It seems to me that the best strategy against Chelsea (especially away) was to play defense, keep it close for 75 minutes, and try to steal a point in the final 15. Did you post this with a different idea in mind?
I'm going to repeat what I have said previously, in the spotlight of this one game this is ok. Indeed, the game plan almost worked but for inches at either end (PTJ palm to the ball whether in the challenge on Ramirez or attempted save from Reiten, and Malard with the crossbar), we could even have a snatched a win let alone a draw.
But, but, but - he does and says the same thing after a draw against Brighton, a pathetic performance against a down and out Arsenal (seriously, we were more of a threat against Chelsea) and bottom of the table Villa. It's insipid, uninspiring and the man is clearly out of ideas, preferring to protect an unbeaten record than actually take a risk and go for a win. It is depressing how predictable he is, in performance, tactics, formation and interview quotes. If we can predict what he'll do so easily, you can bet your wotsits his opposite numbers can too.