Haven’t heard anyone demanding you to go ”all out attack”, but whatever Marc.
WSL 24/25 | Chelsea v United - 12:00 on Sun 24 Nov
- Thread starter jojojo
- Start date
We were playing against Chelsea today -- and away to boot. What were you expecting?
I agree about both of your points in general so far this season. I just think that today we did as well as could reasonably been hoped for.
I'm standing by Skinner this week. He might have overstated it a bit, but you have to grant his point: Our best hope against this team was the idea that if they don't score, they can't win -- and apart from the penalty and some woodwork, it worked.
We don't actually go all out attack against anyone - though admittedly we got as many shots on target against Leicester last week as Chelsea did against us today
So, as a team that presumably was going for defensive solidity, leaving our keeper to do that much work (6 shots on target and plenty of mopping up work to do) is not impressive.
We didn't go possession based either - they had the ball.
We don't look scary as counter attackers. Hoping for the best isn't counter attacking. The only time we actually looked dangerous or even competent was when we threw everything at them in the last 5 minutes. I appreciated the effort.
Unfortunately today's performance didn't look fundamentally different to our matches with Arsenal or with Villa. The stats on possession, shots, shots on target agree.
The result wasn't the problem today - losing by a goal to a team in Chelsea's form isn't bad. It's the lack of progress and the lack of player development that's bad.
I'm okay with this. It seems to me that the best strategy against Chelsea (especially away) was to play defense, keep it close for 75 minutes, and try to steal a point in the final 15. Did you post this with a different idea in mind?