This has probably been discussed to an extent before, but with Solskjaer arguably closer to the sack than he has ever been, and Conte one of the names on many lips as things stand, I wish to discuss the concerns around a potential appointment.
Looking at Conte's record with his past three clubs, he's been successful, but has not stayed for too long at any of the clubs, and things ended sorely at each club, certainly in his last two. It is true his track record doesn't paint him as one for the long-term, and his tendency to fall out with people around his club is something for most clubs to worry about when appointing him, but is it something our club, in our current situation should really be worrying about?
I understand it is fantastic when you stumble on a manager who is good and will be there for the long haul, but I don't think that should be a criteria that should be seriously considered for a club of our standing when making a managerial appointment especially with the squad we have found ourselves with. I can understand the likes of Borussia Dortmund and Leipzig doing it because meticulous planning and smarts is probably the only way they can keep up with the clubs who spend much more than them, but Manchester United?
We have a squad - obviously with it's weaknesses, but arguably close to, if not ready to compete for the big titles, what are we thinking long-term for, why do we need a project? Are we going to start competing when the likes of Pogba, Ronaldo and Cavani are no longer here? If we are going to be waiting for a few years just to compete under each manager, then why have we been spending so much? I'm not arguing that structures shouldn't be put in place for smooth transitions between players and the continuous improvement of the squad, but why should the possibility of a manager not staying for more than a few years or not warming up to some members of the squad put us off from that particular manager?
Considering the amount we spend every window and the fact we will keep spending every window, surely the target should be to maximize our resources every given season. The managers we wish to appoint should be made to understand that, and if the manager looks like one good enough to do that, then surely, how long he will be staying at the club is not a matter of serious concern - when he fails, there will be other managers out here. The potential damage a manager appointed for the long haul could cause is much bigger than one that could be caused by a manager appointed to come in and win straightaway. With Conte, we can remove him without much hesitation if it doesn't work out, but with the long-term idea, we have to give him a few years, and if it still doesn't work out, then how does that benefit anyone?
I have seen quite a few mention how a Conte would leave our squad in a worse state than it is now, but even if it does happen, how much would it really hurt the club? Juventus won six straight titles after he left them, Chelsea and Inter Milan aren't doing too bad either. I just think we need to be much more ruthless, decisive and straightforward with our managerial appointments from now, certainly with the squad we have been able to get to. We needed the likes of Ralf Rangnick and Ten Haag when Mourinho left. They could still do a good job, but we don't need them now as much as we need Antonio Conte.