Greenwood has a lot of potential. That being said, to extrapolate his very fine season into a 40 goal season by a 19 year old would put him in the Messi / Mbappe category, and that is an unfair expectation. He improved in every facet of the game this season, but he still has a hard time imposing his will on the game, needs to improve build up play, and flat out disappears at times. I think when all is said and done, he will be a central striker, but he can’t play there now regularly because he lacks the strength to hold off defenders. I mean, even Rashford has issues with his hold up play and he’s 4 years older than Mason, but still has the potential to become world class in his preferred position on the left.
Sancho is more of a finished product. If we look at it from the perspective of England, your front three is probably Sterling, Kane and Sancho. Rashford is getting games here and there and subbing in, but not in the first 11. Greenwood is far, far away from that 11.
I hear your concern about a Pogba replacement and worries about injuries. Certainly valid. We stumbled when McT got injured, no doubt. Fred was a revelation, and Matic stepped up later on and had some good performances.
My preference for Sancho over Pogba is that I believe that he is potentially a generational talent in a high impact position. I believe with Sancho and no Pogba, we still waltz to into the top 4 for the next several seasons. If we can bolster our midfield with good options (similar to Liverpool), we should be challenging for titles.
Is Pogba a generational talent? Depends on who you ask, so maybe. But he’s pretty inconsistent and has been injured more than we’d like. And he hasn’t been able to carry the team to the title or keep us in the CL spots with regularity.
Ideally, we’d want both. But it may be tough to swing financially.
We probably need a poll for this topic.