- In two of my previous posts, I have clearly mentioned that the best case for United would be having both Pogba and Sancho in the same side provided Pogba is committed and we don't have financial concerns to purchase Sancho.
It was deliberate because it is of ZERO relevance to the fact you have indicated more than once that you want to sale a Pogba to fund buying a Sancho.
Yet again you have made it all about Pogba. Rather than understanding the real point. Namely that a Pogba should ONLY be sold to fund the purchase of another Pogba/Bruno type player. Not to fund the purchase of a player in an entirely different position like a Sancho. A purchase that would result in a big hole in the position Pogba would depart from. Literally not strengthening United at all whilst strengthening our rivals abroad.
You can randomly lash out by calling other posts dumb and people having different opinions as haters but the real point is that some United fans, including me, have doubts over Pogba's
commitment to the club.
There was nothing random about calling out particular posts as dumb. Due to their faulty internal logic:
1. You literally are advocating the equivalent of a car owner selling a back tire to fund the purchase of a front tire, to supposedly improve the condition of the car. That makes no sense at all
2. You are the one who lashed out and started declaring me 'a Pogba apologist'
simply for pointing out the obvious flaws in your proposal. That coupled with the fact you are eager to make everything about Pogba. It's not a stretch to call you a "Pogba hater". For you are acting like one.
3. You naively think a Pogba has zero reason to be unhappy at United. I insist given the facts of how he is portrayed in the media, how ex players in the media and fans regularly question his character, proffessionalism, commitment and actual talen itself. That stance is extremely naive.
Above all Having doubts about a pogba's commitment should never make one entertain the dumb notion he should be exchanged for a person who doesn't operate in the roles he does. Especially an expensive one who would leave United little funds to even replace him cheaply. Because United would be significantly weakened without a second top end central playmaker like him in the squad. Even if an attacker like Sancho were secured.
So quit conflating the argument about what a Pogba type brings to the team and why losing it is terminal. With a desire to keep Pogba around at all cost. The two are not related.
[*]Secondly, Pogba has shown in flashes that he is capable of putting in world class performances. But considering that his 4th season is about to end, has he been a the best or even top 3 CM in the league in this 4 year period?........
.
Reading the above. I'm pretty certain you pay zero attention to the statistics Pogba has actually accrued since he arrived at United as compared to the rest of the league. Frankly the only guys consistently out performing him statistically I'm creativity and goals actually play at City. Or teams that have actually out perfoed United in that period. Operating alongside other top end play makers at their clubs. Whilst he has had to operate on his lonesome at United.
[*]Finally, and most damningly, how do you explain the comments from Pogba's entourage on not just the manager, but the entire club? Why has Pogba maintained silence on it or reassured his commitment to the club?
First, what part of playing through the pain barrier and getting injured long term as a result, shows a lack of commitment to you?
Second, what part of ,"Raiola can't be controlled," do you not understand? Why do you think Fergie hates him? You think Pogba speaking would stop Raiola? Really?
One principle that the club always needs to follow is that no player is bigger than the club and till now Pogba doesn't
qualify to be an exception to the rule.
.........
Again missing the point entirely!
It's not about POGBA! It's about WHAT having a 2nd top end play maker in the squad means for the long term success of the club. Some of us can't understand why the likes of you constantly conflate that concept with the notion a Pogba is supposedly bigger than the club.
Why is it so hard for you to believe that it is best to ONLY sale a Pogba to replace him with a player of the same class and type playing wise? So that his departure leaves the club in a position of strength. Rather than rebirthing a former weakness?
Rather than to sale him to sign a player strengthening an entirely different department whilst significantly weakening the one he is sold from?
I have not given up on Pogba as of now, but I have also become a bit detached from this entire saga. So if he wants to go, then he goes. We may not be able to replace his stardom, but his output (not potential output) is relatively easier to be replaced.
It is not 'atachment' to point out to you the obvious though. Namely that if you sale a Pogba to fund the purchase of a Sancho. There likely won't be money left to replace a single thing a Pogba offered as a player. Forget the off field stardom because it doesn't play football.
In conclusion, there are different viewpoints that people have which is the exact point of this forum. I'm not sure what you mean when you say "Nothing he does is EVER good enough for the likes of you" but it seems that you're having a meltdown. ....
A meltdown? That is rich coming from a guy kinda obsessed about Pogba you make everything about him. .....besides nothing either of us has said is remotely meltdownish frankly......seriously
.
Even the most prominent of Pogba supporters understand that there have been enough reasons for United fans to be alienated with him. You seem to be an experienced poster on this forum, I would hope that you're more than aware of tolerating differing opinions.
Do not conflate me shooting down a differing opinion with not tolerating it.
I repeat. You simply keep conflating people wanting a pogba when sold, to be strictly replaced with another top end midfield play maker, than a top end winger like Sancho or a 9 like kane or whoever, with a desire to keep a pogba at all costs.
The two are not related. We simply come from the understanding that having only a pogba to call on for the last 4 years has hurts us badly. Even this season was ample proof. Once we lost Pogba to injury we were dead in the water. Yet if we had started the season with Bruno on our books. Not only would we have been superio, the period of Pogba being out would never have been felt.
Thus our stance is simple: You sale a Pogba to get a Sancho, You will be left with Bruno alone and you will certainly sink again whenever he gets injured. Or opponents mark/take him out of games because he is the sole center midfield creative out let.
If you can't see where we are coming from there is simply nothing further to discuss. We will then just have to agree to disagree.