Robbie Boy
Full Member
I mean, I'm just trying to get a sense check from the poster here.
Being happy and positive that the team you claim to support has won a game is, according to Foxbatt, a toxic behaviour.
However, nitpicking said result and saying "it's only Newcastle", or saying statements to the effect that Ole is still shit, are perfectly reasonable behaviours?
I mean, if you claim to support a team - you should at least be happy when said team wins, no? Otherwise, what is the point of this forum? Or indeed, the notion of 'support' itself?
Old Trafford, when Utd have just scored with the fans cheering would, if we took Foxbatt's logic to the nth degree, be toxic behaviour, and if we again took that same logic to the nth degree, if those same sets of supporters started booing the players and management, that would be perfectly fine?
Do you not see that inherent contradiction?
If some posters have gone a little doolally in response to the win, then it's a bit weird I agree, but how can something as natural as being happy that the team you profess to support has won a game be in any way shape or form, toxic?
It's both sides mate. There's a-lot of provocation and child like positing from a small minority which is causing shitty arguments and dick swinging contests. It's the manner of how some people post, not necessarily their opinions.
If you give the last few pages an honest unbiased read, you'll see that some posters are posting utter drivel, even ones that you deem to be in your camp.