Incredible amount of spin in this post. For a start, this is not the same team that came second. It's truly baffling that you would even suggest it. I think you need to look back at Mourinho's team sheets that season. There have been wholesale changes since then.
3 of our current starting XI got more than 20 appearances in the league that season and a further 2 got more than 15 appearances.
I don't know where you're getting the idea that the team that came second was good enough for the title. They never were and De Gea playing out of his skin earned them something like 10 extra points that season.
Also, Mourinho got fired because he threw his toys out of the pram and lost the dressing room. He didn't have to do that, he chose to so that's on him.
No spin, just what my fellow Utd fans have told me here and on social media.
I didn't mean it was exactly the same team, but similar in terms of quality. Even better maybe...
I got that idea from out fans' reaction to Jose saying 2nd place and 81 pts was an achievement. Nobody was happy with that, nobody was happy with 2nd place. Nobody was happy being 20pts behind our rivals. Then also according to our fans Ole recruited very well and also got rid of deadwood from Mourinho while not losing any key players either. Logical thinking tells you all that=better team, better manager, better atmosphere. So how come we're having such a bad season overall? Something doesn't add up.
Jose always throws his toys out of the pram, that's on him. But he also wasn't backed after that 2nd place while being scapegoated for anything that went wrong. Point of this is not me defending Mourinho, but pointing out the hypocrisy in terms of how he was treated and how Ole is treated and in terms of standards both of them were/are held to.
Oh my, where do I start. I was right. You personally hate him and then it is hard to see any positives.
About Glazer. So, he is in support of Glazer according to you. So what? He is, love it or not, the one who owns the club. To go against your owner is a big no. So what is he supposed to do? Print t-shirt saying " I hate Glazers"? As any bussinessmen they want to earn money. But we got to say they have invested alot. Look at our budget since they took over. Look at our spendings since they took over. They are not cheep. They invest. Solskjaer does what he thinks is right for the team, not what is right for you as a sensitive individual.
Using same team? Physical preperations? Reacting on other teams? Please, if you don't know anything about coaching don't talk about it. Us having coaching licence can see what he does, what he want to do and if it is going right or wrong way. Nobody is perfect but to come up with this is beyond me.
So, once again I ask you. Is Ranieri better manager then Ferguson because his titlewinning team won by more points than Ferguson? Is Liverpool, Chelsea, Liverpool, Leicester better sides than us in 90's or 2000? Points should be looked at in context. Not taken out just for fun sake and how it works for own cause.
When it comes to Mourinho, we can talk about it forever. He got backed. Not as he think he should be but he got. If it is right or wrong I can't tell. What I can tell is he got lot of players. Like vanGaal. And it didn't go that well. He got sacked because of his behavior towards end. Against everyone. And I can easly say that, despite that I like him and think it is shame that it didn't go well.
You are talking alot about standards. How long should a manager keeps his place before he gets sacked? What is the minimum a manager needs to do every year to have his job at Manchester United? And are you willing to sack manager every year/half year until they reach your expectation?
Quick few points because you keep dancing around the one question I asked you multiple times so there's no point really in going further.
- There's a big difference between openly supporting the leeches that own our football club and 'hating' on them publicly. Calling them your family is not 'best' for Man Utd. Lying that they invested money when they took more than 2 billion out of the club is not best for Utd. Spending Utd's own money and investing are worlds apart.
- I do know about coaching and what Ole's doing isn't it.
- I did use context. I compared two most recent Man Utd managers and ONLY Utd's point totals over the years, not other teams which is what you're doing. Even if we ignore the points total Ole is still win%-wise the worst United manager in PL history. Kind of an art form when you consider he's had two big unbeaten runs in 20 months and still manages to be the worst. He's also Cardiff's worst manager ever. And his main assistant is also the worst for Hull and another club, can't remember of the top of my head. Entire coaching staff consists of failed Cardiff coaches and guys from Australian league.
Those are the people that are supposed to take us back to the top hahahaha
- Mourinho got backed somewhat until the 2nd place. Then most certainly wasn't.
- There's no time limit on coaches. There's no limit on how many you hire and fire. The standard for Man Utd is winning titles. Stop putting Ole in this group that 'needs time'. Pep, Klopp or Allegri ca
Alex Ferguson did the highlighted bit and Keane did the rest so it's not just Ole that is the hypocrite right ?
Really so backing a manager to the tune of 350 million in 3 summer windows is not backing him and you have no idea of who he wanted, just the words of a bitter man ranting after getting sack, oh feck off would you.
Nov 86, AF takes over tries the rest of the season and decides nah not good enough, then tried his first efforts with the "kids" yup failed, then from 88 near breaks the transfer record each time with new signings and did not win the league till 93.
So yeah things take time to turn around, suppose if you were of age 1990, you would have wanted AF out so ? Well based on you're post here it would.
The bloke needs another window and the chance to get rid of some more of the deadwood he inherited and then he can be judge from Xmas onwards. Yes he made mistakes yesterday but its not like AF never made similar ones.
- Of course they are. Since when are SAF and Keane the standard for hypocrisy? Both were proper bastards in many ways. Is that supposed to make me feel better about Ole Glazer Solskjaer?
- That's less than 20% of our turnover. Of course it fecking wasn't enough. Not when you have City and Liverpool spending more than 40% of their turnovers. Look how that turned out for them.
Especially when you look at past 15 years of Glazers spending 150m less when being in CL. Instead of it being the opposite ffs. It's clear what their agenda is and what their goal is.
- Here we go again. "Greatest manager that ever lived did something 30 years ago so this failed Cardiff plonker must be on the same path." Also while we're at it, people lived in caves not that long ago, black people were slaves and women couldn't vote so how about we go back to that time too?
You think that's an argument in Ole's favor but it's anything but. 1) Times change and football has moved on. 2) Ole failed at Cardiff and Molde recently. SAF was hugely successful even before coming to Utd and won a European trophy vs RM. Not doing Ole any favors with things like this you know.
- No, he needs to be sacked. He has done nothing to prove he can take us back to winning PL and CL, no matter the time. He inherited a team which was unsuccessful by finishing 2nd. He then got rid of deadwood and recruited well and is having the worst season since Liverpool were last champions. And he needs more time for that? Your logic is as backwards as Ole took us in his 20 months here.
I'm willing to bet anyone here we will be even worse next season if he stays.