Since being permanent
Honestly, not liking any of those options. If hes sacked now (or at the end of the season) that means Woody and co are let of the hook once again.
Ideally, Ole should resign on his own and then tell the world what a shitshow this club is. Maybe then Woody and the Glazers could be forced out
Wow, just seen the new poll. I very much doubt any manager could turn this around now even when the gap is only 6 points. The squad is too thin, even if we bought 2 players in this window it wouldn't cover the deficiencies.
The planning for this season was utterly atrocious. Even if we somehow fluke top 4 or a trophy it won't change my mind that buying two defenders and a 19 yer old championship winger was somehow a good plan when we lost an experienced striker and two midfielders. We're extremely LUCKY to be in 5th place.
James is 22 just moving out of the youngster stageWow, just seen the new poll. I very much doubt any manager could turn this around now even when the gap is only 6 points. The squad is too thin, even if we bought 2 players in this window it wouldn't cover the deficiencies.
The planning for this season was utterly atrocious. Even if we somehow fluke top 4 or a trophy it won't change my mind that buying two defenders and a 19 yer old championship winger was somehow a good plan when we lost an experienced striker and two midfielders. We're extremely LUCKY to be in 5th place.
Since being permanent
You have to understand that Woodward is not a footballing guy. Yes he can veto deals and probably put deals through, but he's not identifying targets.
He is not the one that decides if the squad is good or not to finish the season, he's not the one that decides training methods and regimes. He's not the one that decides if the young players or Pereira and Lingard are good enough.
Also directing the blame only towards Woodward is also a bad idea. The board is part of this and should share it. Judge is one leading negotiations for example, not Ed. Woodward whilst still incompetent is not running the club by himself.
Those guys need help, but they won't get it from an inept manager.
And no, the recruitment in the summer hasn't been any different to the years before apart from paying premium for British players. AWB can turn very soon a deadwood to attacking manager. Maguire is not 80m guy and again might not be a right fit for the next manager. James is a rotational player.
Nothing special, nothing we haven't seen.
Meanwhile - new contract for Pereira, new contract for Jones, new contract for Mata (3 years, considering we had a rule back then of offering only one year to 30+ players)... 190k salary for Maguire - means it has no resale value, especially considering the 80m pounds he has been brought for.
Not going to bother arguing the recruitment. Whatever. We could go around in circles forever and ultimately it's not the main basis of our conversation.
Woodward has created that structure at the top. He is responsible for it. If he wanted to bring in a DoF/technical director to oversee the entire process he could, but he has chosen this current setup. That's on him, and the lack of improvement in the speed with which deals get done means even if the recruitment is great, you're not getting enough numbers in that a squad this deficient in talent requires.
Barring all the injuries, are Leicester and Chelsea really that much better squad wise? Its beyond shambolicYet only 4 teams better this season, 3 of which are clearly far better teams and squads.
That's my take on it. Ole's trying to move out the dead wood and bring in improvements. Those above him are consistently failing to facilitate that process. If we sack Solskjaer then that's a new low point for me.As long as Ed is in charge makes no difference to me who is running the team now, like I say I’ve reached acceptance with it so all y’all do what you want the manager. Everyone will be bitching in 12-18 months anyway if nothing changes at the top
Imagine... Might as well ask Scholesy if he wants to make a second come back while they're at it!'United to make loan move for Carlos Tevez?'
Monty Python's Manchester United.
Barring all the injuries, are Leicester and Chelsea really that much better squad wise? Its beyond shambolic
Their attacks are a country mile better than ours. To win games you have to score goals. We don't score enough so we don't win enough.Barring all the injuries, are Leicester and Chelsea really that much better squad wise? Its beyond shambolic
Yes they play better football no doubt!! But are their whole squads better than ours? I don't think so imo..Their attacks are a country mile better than ours. To win games you have to score goals. We don't score enough so we don't win enough.
Assuming the people who run the club are capable of recognising how weak the squad is.I don't understand how the board can be fully behind him when the club is as inactive as it is in the transfer window, particularly with how bad the current squad is
No one is arguing about that, but until Ole is here he won't make change of the structure. Having to hire yet another manager however might change that(as slim the possibility is).
Their attacks are a country mile better than ours. To win games you have to score goals. We don't score enough so we don't win enough.
Since most of Ole FC fans love a good excuse, here is the list of problems Chelsea faced during this season:Our midfield is beyond a joke, most of Leicester’s and Chelsea’s walk into ours.
With all the injuries yes its garbage! Board and Ole chucked everyone out without replacements as we all know!Our midfield is beyond a joke, most of Leicester’s and Chelsea’s walk into ours.
You have to have mate We're too old to change teams, or sport.I'm just totally apathetic at this point about the manager. If we sack Ole that's fine, I just don't have high hopes after that anyways.
Since most of Ole FC fans love a good excuse, here is the list of problems Chelsea faced during this season:
https://www.transfermarkt.com/fc-chelsea/ausfallzeiten/verein/631
Red is Absence/injury. This is after they got themselves a new inexperienced manager, sold their best player and didn't spent anything due to the ban.
Yes they play better football no doubt!! But are their whole squads better than ours? I don't think so imo..
He's a petty shit manager by all accounts but he got rid of deadwood so let's keep him. Top logic. The lack of standards these days is astonishing.
So would you let Ole stay if he wins EL or gets top 4?
Pochettino is in Ireland at the moment staying in a local hotel so Oles jobs safe for the next day or two
Anyway I think sacking him now will be pointless as the season is a write off without Rashford, Pogba and Scott. He fecked up the team with how he managed injuries and the Jan window is about to close 1 week from now and even 1 signing wouldn't be enough. This isn't a good atmosphere for a new manager to come. There won't be a new manager bounce this time. Unfortunately the perfect chance to sack him was in November.
So best option for now is to let him continue this pointless season and start negotiating with Poch so that we hire him in May, totally fresh with a summer window ahead. Pogba might change his mind about leaving by this point and decides to try his luck one last time with Poch's experiment.
With all due respect the only reason Lampard and Chelsea are 4th is because how crap we, spurs and Arsenal are.Since most of Ole FC fans love a good excuse, here is the list of problems Chelsea faced during this season:
https://www.transfermarkt.com/fc-chelsea/ausfallzeiten/verein/631
Red is Absence/injury. This is after they got themselves a new inexperienced manager, sold their best player and didn't spent anything due to the ban.
I disagree. Surely a manager who actually knows what he's doing can do better even with this squad? This is a season where every team below 3rd place is absolute trash, there is still a chance(albeit quite small) that we will make top 4.
And even if you are right, and a new manager changes nothing results-wise, appointing him now gives him the possibility to assert the squad in official matches and allows the squad to get used to his methods. It's definitely not pointless.
I do agree that the best option would have been to sack Ole before the January transfer window, but even now there is no reason to keep him in charge anymore.
Barring all the injuries, are Leicester and Chelsea really that much better squad wise? Its beyond shambolic
Spurs and Arsenal already changed managers due to poor results.With all due respect the only reason Lampard and Chelsea are 4th is because how crap we, spurs and Arsenal are.
Our midfield is beyond a joke, most of Leicester’s and Chelsea’s walk into ours.
Leicester or Chelsea fan?At least 17.2% of us know what's best for the club
Spurs and Arsenal already changed managers due to poor results.
No, my comment about Chelsea was in relation to the squads Ole and Lampard are working with. By no means Chelsea have had a better team or squad available so far into the season. They also have inexperienced manager yet are ahead of us.My reply was regarding your comment where it seemed you were saying Lampard was doing some good job to which I said all are in the same boat, just that Lampard is doing a less shit job in comparison to Ole. As for Ole to be sacked, well I have already said he needs to go, if not now at least at the end of the season.