The biggest fallacy in that point is Klopp, Pep and even to a certain degree Pellegrini were proven top level managers who had already proven earlier in their careers that with some top players, they can get the team to be better than the sum of the parts by getting average players to play their best every single time. So you could say they struggled a season because they didn't have the right players available.
With Ole you have nothing to fall back on. The only thing which is actually true is that he had Cardiff relegated after coming in mid-season to try to keep them afloat and then was sacked the following season from the Championship Cardiff team as they were struggling under him. So he has got nothing to prove that he is maximizing our players' abilities. From how we have struggled against teams with much worse players than ours on the contrary suggests that our players are struggling under a manager who has no business being where he is.
It's an omission not a fallacy but I understand your point.
Clearly Ole isn't experienced. But you don't have to be an experienced manager to be successful at a top club.
We tried the manager with the greatest CV in modern football and he failed spectacularly and ended up fighting with everyone at the club. Before him, we tried a man with encyclopedic knowledge of the game and experience within European football at top clubs, and he instituted an awful style of play that yielded no results and got him sacked.
Pep and Zidane both led clubs they had a strong connection with to incredible amounts of success with no prior experience. They are the exception to the norm but clearly prior experience is not essential to beingk successful at a big club. Nor is a track record enough if the rest of the ingredients are not there at the club.
Hell, there are examples that show you don't always need a good manager for success. Di Matteo won a Champions League and Deschamps was hardly pulling up trees in club football before he led France to a World Cup.
The main thing that all of the above examples had and we lack is a quality, balanced, cohesive squad and an existing developed framework for success.
Just to be clear I'm not saying that everybody should back Ole until the end of time as he is beyond reproach. He may very well turn out to be not up to the job. I'm saying that in our current state with our best player angling for a move, an awful owner, an incompetent CEO and an inexperienced, imbalanced squad lacking so much quality, whoever the manager is we're on a hiding to nowhere. I would merely suggest that these problems go far beyond Ole, and call for those who are deeply unhappy with how things are going now to focus their ire to the people who have put the club into the state it is rather than the yet another faltering manager at the helm.
If we had an experienced DOF who decided that Ole does not fit the clear long-term plan for the club, I would support his sacking and have some degree of confidence that the club will have properly scouted and identified his replacement.
However, as things stand, changing manager feels like changing the deckchairs on the titanic. Except it's even more futile, since in our case, the best deckchair is permanently broken and wants to try his luck overboard, and the person in charge of choosing the new chairs doesn't know his armchair from his elbow.
