NM
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,506
That is the common consensus.I think carlsen will eventually win but this time it will be much closer.
That is the common consensus.I think carlsen will eventually win but this time it will be much closer.
Not wimply. Carlsen defended correctly. Ra4 was very hard to find on the board.Slightly wimpy finish by Anand. Or was the a pawn doomed anyway? Overall both players are probably reasonably happy with their play.
This one is different. In game 2 he just lost a game. He did blunder in the end but he blundered in a very difficult position he was supposed to lose anyway. This game is very different. This game was pretty much a 2 point swing in one move. Anand was very close to objectively winning after that blunder (not even taking the psychological impact on Carlsen into account).He will recover. He recovered from the 2nd game defeat. However, Carlsen is simply the better player right now.
Yeah, he seemingly walked willingly into just the kind of position Carlsen wants. Strange. I think Kramnik suggested it might have been computer prep that didn't take the practical difficulties into account.Poor game from Anand,something wrong from the beginning.
I think carlsen might hold on to the lead.
I was thinking about the exact same thing (biggest blunders in WC games). Thanks for the link.I found a blog with a ranked list of WC blunders, which Chigorin deservedly tops. He was winning, which would have tied the match 9-9, and a two seconds later he had lost the match 10-8 after overlooking mate in two. The Alekhine - Euwe one is good too, with the players overlooking a simple winning tactic four times in a row.
He did well though to keep as much of a poker face as he could until Anand moved.The video (scroll down) from the critical moment is amusing, although it only shows the board and the hands. Things could have been very different if Anand had paid attention to Carlsen's hand. "Kd.............OH SHIT OH SHIT......................2."
Is the Berlin the worst opening ever in chess?
I really hate it.
Hopefully we won't see it again in this match, but I have a feeling we will.It is.
Even the most imaginative and creative players can't deliver a game with some genuine entertainment, never mind excitement when playing it.
As we know, Bobby Fischer, despite his dynamic style, enjoyed playing the exchange variation (4.Bxc6), one of the driest and boring lines in Ruy Lopez. However, those games look like fireworks now compared to the contemporary Berlin.