- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Messages
- 896
Doesn't surprise me one bit. Says it all really...
Martial sprinted 4 times in 71 minutes. Once every 17m45s. As a winger.
feck my life.
Lukaku once every 22m30s.
Did they all have horse tranquiliser for breakfast or something?
Martial sprinted 4 times in 71 minutes. Once every 17m45s. As a winger.
feck my life.
Lukaku once every 22m30s.
Did they all have horse tranquiliser for breakfast or something?
This reflects badly on Mourinho and even more so on the players.
Anyone could have told you Luke Shaw was the hardest working united player on Saturday without stats to confirm it.
The problem I have is that if the manager has to go fine, but the players who stop trying or aren't tying hard enough to begin with, generally aren't made of the right stuff either.
If you are a winner you don't stop trying and sulk, regardless of who the manager is. You don't keep losing our because you can't be bothered to try as hard as your competitors.
Shaw has suffered more than the rest when it comes to criticism from both the media and his own manager, yet he's been able to roll his sleeves up and do something about it. The rest have no real excuse
players take on the persona of the manager. If we get an up beat enthused manager who wants to play creative and attacking football then it will reflect in the attitude of the players.
Martial sprinted 4 times in 71 minutes. Once every 17m45s. As a winger.
feck my life.
Lukaku once every 22m30s.
Did they all have horse tranquiliser for breakfast or something?
Not really. Players are grown adult people like you and me. They aren't pets or babies looking to follow their master.
If a player decides not to try or to down tools, or simply isn't trying hard enough to begin with, that's as much a reflection on them as it is the manager...and you have to factor in that any new manager is going to be faced with the same problem.
You play to win because you want to win, not because a manager/team mate hasn't done anything to make you sulk in the past few days.
disagree. Look at how United played in Fergie's last season vs Moyes season. van Gaals first season vs his second season. Or Mourinho's 2015-2016 Chelsea team, vs Conte's team in 2016-2017, and then again Conte the following year. We are talking about teams with almost identical players giving vastly difference performances based on a change of manager, or the buying into/falling out with the manager.
You’re giving examples of squads of players who have behaved disgracefully in the past as evidence that our players aren’t behaving disgracefully now. Are you sure you’ve thought this through?
I agree it reflects pretty poorly on the players if they don't try as hard becuase they don't like their boss, but by that standard pretty much every single footballer playing today falls into that category.
Perhaps they are all snowflakes or whatever, but that is the reality of it and we'd better start getting used to it.
I agree it reflects pretty poorly on the players if they don't try as hard becuase they don't like their boss, but by that standard pretty much every single footballer playing today falls into that category.
Perhaps they are all snowflakes or whatever, but that is the reality of it and we'd better start getting used to it.
I agree it’s a general trend but it does look as though certain squads of players are more bipolar than others. Chelsea were always a classic example (or Madrid) but now it looks like you can add Manchester United to the list.
At least, you can do that once the useless twats prove themselves of turning things round once we sign the right manager. As noodles is alluding to, we can’t be certain that our players are actually less shit than they seem to be under Mourinho (although, personally, I think they will look a lot better under a different manager)
Martial sprinted 4 times in 71 minutes. Once every 17m45s. As a winger.
feck my life.
Lukaku once every 22m30s.
Did they all have horse tranquiliser for breakfast or something?
disagree. Look at how United played in Fergie's last season vs Moyes season. van Gaals first season vs his second season. Or Mourinho's 2015-2016 Chelsea team, vs Conte's team in 2016-2017, and then again Conte the following year. We are talking about teams with almost identical players giving vastly difference performances based on a change of manager, or the buying into/falling out with the manager.
Again not really. Chelsea sulked under Mourinho then the same players who were still there sulked under Conte when things weren't going well.
Three managers in a row have had problem with players at United now. Which is a semi non argument anyway with how many new players we've bought in that time.
Anyone can play well when you are winning games and everything is working. When there are problems is when you see who the players made of the right stuff are. Neither mourinho nor any other manager for rd their players not to try or to sulk. Players do that for themselves and you find they will do it whenever things don't go their way, not just because they specifically don't like a certain manager.
players take on the persona of the manager. If we get an up beat enthused manager who wants to play creative and attacking football then it will reflect in the attitude of the players.
Agree with this. Players are pretty similar everywhere. I don't think that City and Liverpool have more motivated and aggressive players. Most of them are nothing like, say, Roy Keane. Yet they work very hard. The buck stops with the manager. It's his job to make them hungry for success and run like mad. But it is far easier to achieve that if you offer them a style of play that helps them feel the joy of playing football and express themselves freely.
If this was a one-off thing, absolutely.Not really. Players are grown adult people like you and me. They aren't pets or babies looking to follow their master.
If a player decides not to try or to down tools, or simply isn't trying hard enough to begin with, that's as much a reflection on them as it is the manager...and you have to factor in that any new manager is going to be faced with the same problem.
You play to win because you want to win, not because a manager/team mate hasn't done anything to make you sulk in the past few days.
If this was a one-off thing, absolutely.
But it's been obvious since Mourinho came in that he puts us out there to play passively. I mean, this thread is two years old and only a few months after Mourinho took over, and we were talking about our workrate, pressing and movement back then. So when that is how we've basically played for two years, now if everyone is down with low morale and feeling uncertain the bad aspects are naturally going to be even worse. Now add in a line-up that was terrible and pretty much guaranteed our attackers would get completely isolated...
The players obviously do have to take some responsibility for it. But the manager certainly plays a huge part in it all.
Yeah you are right but I think there are different issues here though. Our passive style of play and lack of energy compared to other team's I think is on Jose as it's either tactical or after 2 years he still hasn't done anything to address it.
On Saturday though you saw a team not even particularly trying. It looked like sulking. Different to just passive tactics and I think there you are looking as much at the players as the manager, as it's not the first time. A one off can be a bad day, but this is now a trend.
The stats with Shaw compared to the rest kind of confirm it. They could have been trying harder if they had chosen to. Not liking the manager or being upset at how thjbgs are going is a really soft reason to simply not try for a supposed team of elite professional athletes
Jose fielded a basketball team the other day though. Basketballers are not famous for making many sprints.
In that system it is only natural that a wingback had most sprints.