You keep throwing words like "stupid", "absurd", "nonsense", "laughable" around, yet the reality is that Kane left and Spurs got better (Meanwhile the team he has joined have gotten worse). You can put whatever parameters or other factors around it that you want but the idea that Tottenham playing better football and being much less reliant on one player for their attacking play has nothing to do with them selling Kane, is a little bit strange. You are suggesting it is a pure coincidence.
Maybe Tottenham will get into a relegation battle next season or something (I doubt it), but you can't use speculative arguments like saying YOU think they will get worse next season, and then start throwing words like absurd or stupid around at other people. Especially when they already were worse last season so would in effect have to get even worse than that before you started making enough sense to start patronising anyone.
I'm not discounting that the new manager has made a big difference, but I'm not convinced they would be able to play how they have this season with Kane, because its not how any team with Kane in it has ever been able to set up. Having Kane spank every single free kick into the wall or orbit instead of letting someone take them who might have a chance of scoring or creating a goal, is a direct example of how Tottenham were putting him before the benefit of the team, which is why I brought it up. I very seriously doubt any manager would ever think this was a good idea, so how do you know this sort of silliness wouldn't have carried on this season if Kane was there?
And there you go again. You can't discount the possibility that Harry Kane was one of the things that made them a worse team last season, because they have played better football without him, they have scored a comparable amount of goals (it will be more barring a poor end to the season). Their results have been better. There is no barometer by which they haven't improved since he has left, so there's nothing to support your argument that isn't speculative. It doesn't mean you're wrong but it does mean you can't possibly KNOW that you're right.
I haven't addressed
@VP89 's point about Kane under Ange, because here's the thing. Ange was appointed as manager on the 6th June...Kane was sold to Bayern on the 30th of June. During this time Tottenham played a total of 0 games. So if you do want me to address it for some reason, I'm going to suggest that its probably "nonsense". With this you have unwittingly decided to share in VP's habit of being a baffling weirdo.