I just think the Ronaldo comparison is lazy. Yes, both favoured a step-over, but for me he is still more comparable to Bebe. I genuinely am not as convinced as most others seem to be that Zaha has the 'natural ability' that people speak of. I think his attempts to do the outrageous makes him appear to have the natural ability, but just can't put it together. I still think a finer eye can detect a difference between him and a young Ronaldo or Nani, as I have seen referenced in this thread. For me, he looks a player who has based his style on a youg Ronaldo or Nani, but that does not make him good at it.
I don't expect him to be fully complete just yet. Other young wingers are also unpolished. I am just concerned at what I feel is a lack of ability. I think that is somewhat masked at the moment by his style and ambition. The tricks are not only ill-timed or the wrong choice - they do not actually work. The touch is incomparable to the likes of Lingard, Ravel, Sterling and Ince in my view. I am not comparing him to Ribery, I am comparing him to his direct competition at U21 level. He has played far more professional games than all of those too, so the whole 'inexperienced' thing is a bit overplayed I think.
Ultimately, the main difference between Zaha and young Ronaldo/Nani/Quaresma etc is that while they didn't have the end product, the ability was clear and they still went past players for fun. For me, Zaha tries to go past players for fun.
With regards to Bebe, I don't think it's as far-fetched as some others do. Bebe has shown pockets of promise too, let's not forget. He is physically exceptional for a start, fast and strong. He has also had his share of good games/moments for our reserves, and has impressed on loan in the Portuguese League. He's also impressed in the first team in pre-season last year, and has gotten goals for the first team, including at CL level, and for Portuguese U21. That list was just to those to say how much Zaha has 'proved' in comparison to Bebe, by the way, not to suggest he's a great player.
Watching them play first-team footy for us, I see Bebe struggle to cross well, which Zaha can do better. He is much more of a goal threat though. For me, a typical Zaha moment is to receive the ball, try a trick, get dispossessed, and then foul the defender in trying to win it back. Or get played through in a good position, and produce something that is neither a cross or a shot, and then put his hands on his head while everyone praises the attempt. Basically, both are raw and unpolished, and have strengths and weaknesses. Hence the comparison. Neither have demonstrated real top class technical ability in my view.
It's lazy to just put Ronaldo, Robinho, Denilson and Zaha in the same bracket, when there are vast differences in the 'natural ability' that people speak of. Just because they all do step-overs doesn't make them in the same league.
[/Essay]