Any keeper in the world is going to look dodgy with Maguire leading the defense ahead of him, and McFred shielding that same defense.
Maybe. But Maguire is a still a good player, who is having his worst ever season and is suffering from a massive crisis of confidence at present.
You could argue that swapping the defenders in front of De Gea could improve performances. But how many times has that been done already and not worked?
What's going to have the most impact? Keeping everything the same but trying (again) to bring in a better standard of player? Or changing how you try and play?
The example of Pep binning off Joe Hart for a combination of Caballero and Bravo has been brought up. On paper, at the time, those two were worse goalkeepers than Hart. But they were key to how Pep wanted to play. They conceded fewer goals and scored more goals as a team in the league, with more or less the same defence. The spine was sorted first and everything around that second.
For example, if you changed nothing else and spent all of your reported £200m budget on a proper defensive midfield player, a goalkeeper more suited to how Ten Hag likes to play, a box to box number 8 and a left footed right forward to replace Greenwood, I think it has the most impact of any changes you could make.
Three of those are maybe Ajax players! Alvarez, Gravenberch and Antony.
You could argue that a proper defensive midfielder would help the defence and De Gea play better too, which is probably correct. But I don't think it has the same impact as wholesale changes to 2 elements of the team's spine.
People saying that Ten Hag should be able to work with De Gea for now until he finds a suitable replacement. But any manager in the world
should be able to 'get by' with a £200m back 4 of Wan-Bissaka, Shaw, Maguire and Varane!!
Sort out what's directly behind that back 4 and what's directly in front of it and you might be pleasantly surprised just how good a back 4 it could be.