Who's hot? Who's not? (spoiler, Richie De Laet is not)

Yep. Not seeing the attractiveness.
He looks gormless as hell, can't imagine how anyone would find that attractive. A bit like Carrick, though if our No. managed to close his mouth every once in a while on the pitch I might be able to start to grasp why he's in such a high position on this list.

As for so many people slating poor Jones: yes, we know his thousand faces but what if these women only saw a very carefully selected picture? Like this one:

Phil-Jones-007.jpg
or this:
Phil%20Jones.jpg
 
And we all know how much the Americans know their football. I mean, soccer. I bet the majority were just given one photo of the players to make the judgment.
 
If Buttner was still here he would have definitely been in the not hot selection
 
Why does everyone on here find Falcao attractive? He looks about 50 half of the time and he has no neck. His hair is greasy as feck too.
Yeah, I don't see 'it' with him either. I don't think Blind's all that either. :nervous: His hair's great though. But cut it low (the true test) and he doesn't look special. van Persie all day, from our squad.

It's a false representation, because it's sorted into position. Caulker made the top 11, but Navas was 12th.
 
Last edited:
It would appear that I have a very different taste in men to women.
 
Yeah, I don't see 'it' with him either. I don't think Blind's all that either. :nervous: His hair's great though. But cut it low (the true test) and he doesn't look special. van Persie all day, from our squad.

It's a false representation, because it's sorted into position. Caulker made the top 11, but Navas was 12th.

Blind is really ugly. He looks like an efit of "the perfect man" made by putting a load of features deemed attractive that actually ends up looking like Frankensteins monster.