- Joined
- May 4, 2014
- Messages
- 69
I'd say Argentina but there are really about 10 teams who have a good shot.
By SA I meant South America and not South Africa.They didn't qualify for the 2010 tournament so yeah, that was just a dream.
Oh. Well, they finished second behind Argentina.By SA I meant South America and not South Africa.
Yeah, didnt see any threads worth my time before now!And he joined in 2012!
Is geography really still an issue in this day and age?I think Geography will play heavily into who does well; nearly as much as relative squad strengths.
Is geography really still an issue in this day and age?I think Geography will play heavily into who does well; nearly as much as relative squad strengths.
Is geography really still an issue in this day and age?
Argentina are getting a big shout, I'm not up to speed with them, I see Tevez didn't make the squad suggesting strength in depth. I voted Brazil on the basis of home advantage and a relatively strong team. I think it's up for grabs though, and Spain, Germany and Holland could do well.
As an England fan I naturally think we are out at the group stage, and that we'll get royally bummed by every team we play.
Voted France, along with @Scorpy, he better not be an idiot.
Absolutely.
Correct me if I am wrong, but there have been 4 WCs prior to this in SAM with all 4 being won by SAM nations.
Brazil have a very balanced team with a couple of genuine match winners and the best defender in the world to stop the opposition ones. Think they will see this one through.