Bastian
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
- Messages
- 19,559
- Supports
- Mejbri
It's an interesting situation. If he steps down after the Euros with all these talented young players, who will the FA trust to develop the team going forward? And who would England fans want?
Do people know what the decision making process is like for appointing a manager for England? Looking at the FA board there's very limited football experience there (Rick Parry, Jobi McAnuff, and Jack Pearce as a board observer), the rest are business people and venture capitalists.
When Southgate was appointed the committee in charge consisted of then:
FA CEO Martin Glenn (who was involved as a director at Leicester and actually has coaching qualifications, with a box ticking business résumé)
FA Vice-Chairman David Gill, previously United CEO
FA Technical Director Dan Ashworth who had been a youth coach at Cambridge before working in the youth setup at West Brom eventually revolutionising the structure of the club
Would it be correct to assume it will be people occupying the same positions, namely:
FA CEO Mark Bullingham
FA Vice-Chairman Peter McCormick
FA Technical Director John McDermott (succeeding Les Reed in '21), who oversaw Spurs' academy for a number of years and took Alex Inglethorpe and Kieran McKenna under his wing (the latter of whom rated him extremely highly, as well as Inglethorpe who was senior to him)
This is such an important decision. Someone courageous enough not to just throw all the best players into a pile of XI and hope it works itself out, but someone capable of putting the collective first, whilst also promoting that progressive football, not being afraid to play on the front foot. Certainly with players coming through like Mainoo, Foden, Palmer, Saka, it's just too important to faff about with it like the FA have done in the last decades. My opinion of course, but I can't remember when England had a manager that made me think it was the right fit. Maybe Hoddle was OK, but he was pretty savage too, the way he tore into Becks for instance. At least he was progressive in his vision.
Do people know what the decision making process is like for appointing a manager for England? Looking at the FA board there's very limited football experience there (Rick Parry, Jobi McAnuff, and Jack Pearce as a board observer), the rest are business people and venture capitalists.
When Southgate was appointed the committee in charge consisted of then:
FA CEO Martin Glenn (who was involved as a director at Leicester and actually has coaching qualifications, with a box ticking business résumé)
FA Vice-Chairman David Gill, previously United CEO
FA Technical Director Dan Ashworth who had been a youth coach at Cambridge before working in the youth setup at West Brom eventually revolutionising the structure of the club
Would it be correct to assume it will be people occupying the same positions, namely:
FA CEO Mark Bullingham
FA Vice-Chairman Peter McCormick
FA Technical Director John McDermott (succeeding Les Reed in '21), who oversaw Spurs' academy for a number of years and took Alex Inglethorpe and Kieran McKenna under his wing (the latter of whom rated him extremely highly, as well as Inglethorpe who was senior to him)
This is such an important decision. Someone courageous enough not to just throw all the best players into a pile of XI and hope it works itself out, but someone capable of putting the collective first, whilst also promoting that progressive football, not being afraid to play on the front foot. Certainly with players coming through like Mainoo, Foden, Palmer, Saka, it's just too important to faff about with it like the FA have done in the last decades. My opinion of course, but I can't remember when England had a manager that made me think it was the right fit. Maybe Hoddle was OK, but he was pretty savage too, the way he tore into Becks for instance. At least he was progressive in his vision.
Last edited: